methylophilus methylotrophus
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

70
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

18
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2009 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yurgis A. V. Yomantas ◽  
Irina L. Tokmakova ◽  
Natalya V. Gorshkova ◽  
Elena G. Abalakina ◽  
Svetlana M. Kazakova ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT The isolation of auxotrophic mutants, which is a prerequisite for a substantial genetic analysis and metabolic engineering of obligate methylotrophs, remains a rather complicated task. We describe a novel method of constructing mutants of the bacterium Methylophilus methylotrophus AS1 that are auxotrophic for aromatic amino acids. The procedure begins with the Mu-driven integration of the Escherichia coli gene aroP, which encodes the common aromatic amino acid transporter, into the genome of M. methylotrophus. The resulting recombinant strain, with improved permeability to certain amino acids and their analogues, was used for mutagenesis. Mutagenesis was carried out by recombinant substitution of the target genes in the chromosome by linear DNA using the FLP-excisable marker flanked with cloned homologous arms longer than 1,000 bp. M. methylotrophus AS1 genes trpE, tyrA, pheA, and aroG were cloned in E. coli, sequenced, disrupted in vitro using a Kmr marker, and electroporated into an aroP carrier recipient strain. This approach led to the construction of a set of marker-less M. methylotrophus AS1 mutants auxotrophic for aromatic amino acids. Thus, introduction of foreign amino acid transporter genes appeared promising for the following isolation of desired auxotrophs on the basis of different methylotrophic bacteria.


2008 ◽  
Vol 106 (6) ◽  
pp. 574-579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kohei Ishikawa ◽  
Yuriko Toda-Murakoshi ◽  
Fumito Ohnishi ◽  
Kazuya Kondo ◽  
Tsuyoshi Osumi ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 212-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna Nakonieczna ◽  
Tadeusz Kaczorowski ◽  
Agnieszka Obarska-Kosinska ◽  
Janusz M. Bujnicki

ABSTRACT MmeI from Methylophilus methylotrophus belongs to the type II restriction-modification enzymes. It recognizes an asymmetric DNA sequence, 5′-TCCRAC-3′ (R indicates G or A), and cuts both strands at fixed positions downstream of the specific site. This particular feature has been exploited in transcript profiling of complex genomes (using serial analysis of gene expression technology). We have shown previously that the endonucleolytic activity of MmeI is strongly dependent on the presence of S-adenosyl-l-methionine (J. Nakonieczna, J. W. Zmijewski, B. Banecki, and A. J. Podhajska, Mol. Biotechnol. 37:127-135, 2007), which puts MmeI in subtype IIG. The same cofactor is used by MmeI as a methyl group donor for modification of an adenine in the upper strand of the recognition site to N 6-methyladenine. Both enzymatic activities reside in a single polypeptide (919 amino acids [aa]), which puts MmeI also in subtype IIC of the restriction-modification systems. Based on a molecular model, generated with the use of bioinformatic tools and validated by site-directed mutagenesis, we were able to localize three functional domains in the structure of the MmeI enzyme: (i) the N-terminal portion containing the endonucleolytic domain with the catalytic Mg2+-binding motif D70-X9-EXK82, characteristic for the PD-(D/E)XK superfamily of nucleases; (ii) a central portion (aa 310 to 610) containing nine sequence motifs conserved among N 6-adenine γ-class DNA methyltransferases; (iii) the C-terminal portion (aa 610 to 919) containing a putative target recognition domain. Interestingly, all three domains showed highest similarity to the corresponding elements of type I enzymes rather than to classical type II enzymes. We have found that MmeI variants deficient in restriction activity (D70A, E80A, and K82A) can bind and methylate specific nucleotide sequence. This suggests that domains of MmeI responsible for DNA restriction and modification can act independently. Moreover, we have shown that a single amino acid residue substitution within the putative target recognition domain (S807A) resulted in a MmeI variant with a higher endonucleolytic activity than the wild-type enzyme.


2008 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
pp. 191-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena G. Abalakina ◽  
Irina L. Tokmakova ◽  
Natalya V. Gorshkova ◽  
Evgueni R. Gak ◽  
Valerii Z. Akhverdyan ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 124 (2) ◽  
pp. 327-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuharu Tsujimoto ◽  
Yoshiya Gunji ◽  
Yuri Ogawa-Miyata ◽  
Megumi Shimaoka ◽  
Hisashi Yasueda

2005 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco J. Enguita ◽  
Ehmke Pohl ◽  
David L. Turner ◽  
Helena Santos ◽  
Maria Arménia Carrondo

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Thomas Parker ◽  
Dorothea Taylor ◽  
George M Garrity

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Thomas Parker ◽  
Dorothea Taylor ◽  
George M Garrity

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document