rotation pole
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

21
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

6
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoonyoung Kim ◽  
David Jewitt ◽  
Jessica Agarwal ◽  
Max Mutchler ◽  
Man-To Hui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 895 (2) ◽  
pp. L34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoonyoung Kim ◽  
David Jewitt ◽  
Max Mutchler ◽  
Jessica Agarwal ◽  
Man-To Hui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre Couhert ◽  
Christian Bizouard ◽  
Flavien Mercier ◽  
Kristel Chanard ◽  
Marianne Greff ◽  
...  

<p>The over four decades long record of Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) observations to a variety of historical geodetic spherical satellites makes it possible to directly observe the long-term (seasonal to decadal time scales) displacement of the Earth’s mean axis of maximum inertia, namely its principal figure axis, with respect to the crust, through the determination of the degree-2 order-1 geopotential coefficients over the 34-year period 1984—2017.</p><p>On the other hand, the pole coordinate time series (mainly from GPS and VLBI data), yield the motion of the rotation pole with even a greater accuracy.</p><p>The time-dependent nature of the response of the Earth’s mantle to external forces, where it behaves either elastically on short time scales (seconds) or like a viscous fluid over geological time scales (millions of years), is poorly constrained at decadal periods. Here we propose to relate oscillations of the figure axis to those of the Earth’s rotation pole (through the Euler-Liouville equations) to study the mass-related excitation of polar motion and provide global constraints on the rheological properties of the deep Earth.</p>


Author(s):  
V.Yu. Belashov ◽  
◽  
E.S. Belashova ◽  
O.A. Kharshiladze ◽  
◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 349 (4) ◽  
pp. 159-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando Lopes ◽  
Jean-Louis Le Mouël ◽  
Dominique Gibert
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 199 (2) ◽  
pp. 1161-1165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matt A. King ◽  
Christopher S. Watson

Abstract Secular motion of Earth's rotation pole results in large-scale secular deformation of Earth. Here, we investigate the magnitude of the deformation that has resulted from the rapid motion of the rotation pole to the east since ∼2005. We show that geodetic (GNSS, DORIS, VLBI and SLR) estimates of vertical velocity since ∼2005 have been biased by up to ±0.38 mm yr–1 relative to the longer-term deformation pattern. The largest signals occur within regions that include the U.S. Pacific Coast, Europe and South Pacific islands where geodetic measurements provide essential measurements of tide-gauge vertical movement and important constraints on models of glacial isostatic adjustment. Consequently, geodetic vertical velocities based on recent data should not be interpreted as being identical to centennial or longer term vertical land movement. Since 2010 the effect is further amplified by the overprediction of the IERS polar motion model relative to the ongoing secular change in pole position—during this time geodetic vertical velocities based on the IERS pole tide model are not just biased relative to the long-term rates but also from actual post-2010 Earth deformation. For geophysical or reference frame studies seeking geodetic vertical velocities that are representative of decadal timescales, where interannual variation is considered noise, the correction for this non-linear effect is straightforward, requiring an elastic computation using a reference rate of polar motion that is linear over the timescales of interest.


2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (S291) ◽  
pp. 392-392
Author(s):  
Alexander Gusev ◽  
Irina Kitiashvili

AbstractAt present time there are investigations of precession and nutation for very different celestial multi-layer bodies: the Earth (Getino 1995), Moon (Gusev 2010), planets of Solar system (Gusev 2010) and pulsars (Link et al. 2007). The long-periodic precession phenomenon was detected for few pulsars: PSR B1828-11, PSR B1557-50, PSR 2217+47, PSR 0531+21, PSR B0833-45, and PSR B1642-03. Stairs, Lyne & Shemar (2000) have found that the arrival-time residuals from PSR B1828-11 vary periodically with a different periods. According to our model, the neutron star has the rigid crust (RC), the fluid outer core (FOC) and the solid inner core (SIC). The model explains generation of four modes in the rotation of the pulsar: two modes of Chandler wobble (CW, ICW) and two modes connecting with free core nutation (FCN, FICN) (Gusev & Kitiashvili 2008). We are propose the explanation for all harmonics of Time of Arrival (TOA) pulses variations as precession of a neutron star owing to differential rotation of RC, FOC and crystal SIC of the pulsar PSR B1828-11: 250, 500, 1000 days. We used canonical method for interpretation TOA variations by Chandler Wobble (CW) and Free Core Nutation (FCN) of pulsar.The two - layer model can explain occurrence twin additional fashions in rotation pole motion of a NS: CW and FCN. In the frame of the three-layer model we investigate the free rotation of dynamically-symmetrical PSR by Hamilton methods. Correctly extending theory of SIC-FOC-RC differential rotation for neutron star, we investigated dependence CW, ICW, FCN and FICN periods from flatness of different layers of pulsar.Our investigation showed that interaction between rigid crust, RIC and LOC can be characterized by four modes of periodic variations of rotation pole: CW, retrograde Free Core Nutation (FCN), prograde Free Inner Core Nutation (FICN) and Inner Core Wobble (ICW). In the frame of the three-layer model we proposed the explanation for all pulse fluctuations by differential rotation crust, outer core and inner core of the neutron star and received estimations of dynamical flattening of the pulsar inner and outer cores, including the heat dissipation. We have offered the realistic model of the dynamical pulsar structure and two explanations of the feature of flattened of the crust, the outer core and the inner core of the pulsar.


2004 ◽  
Vol 616 (2) ◽  
pp. 1278-1283 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Vasundhara ◽  
Pavan Chakraborty
Keyword(s):  

2000 ◽  
Vol 178 ◽  
pp. 421-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.R. Dickman

I had originally planned to focus this talk on two novel sources of Chandler wobble excitation: tectonic, associated with aseismic processes occurring for example at subduction zones; and cryospheric, associated with the transient oceanic responses to episodes of ice-cap melting. I was also asked by the conference convenors to present a brief historical review of the secular motion of Earth’s rotation pole. In the course of preparing that review, I was struck by the exceedingly controversial nature of the topic, from beginning to end; as a result, the review will be somewhat lengthy, and I will not have time to discuss cryospheric excitation of wobble.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document