pentatricopeptide repeat proteins
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

57
(FIVE YEARS 5)

H-INDEX

23
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 510-522
Author(s):  
Mizuki Takenaka ◽  
Sachi Takenaka ◽  
Tatjana Barthel ◽  
Brody Frink ◽  
Sascha Haag ◽  
...  

AbstractRNA editosomes selectively deaminate cytidines to uridines in plant organellar transcripts—mostly to restore protein functionality and consequently facilitate mitochondrial and chloroplast function. The RNA editosomal pentatricopeptide repeat proteins serve target RNA recognition, whereas the intensively studied DYW domain elicits catalysis. Here we present structures and functional data of a DYW domain in an inactive ground state and activated. DYW domains harbour a cytidine deaminase fold and a C-terminal DYW motif, with catalytic and structural zinc atoms, respectively. A conserved gating domain within the deaminase fold regulates the active site sterically and mechanistically in a process that we termed gated zinc shutter. Based on the structures, an autoinhibited ground state and its activation are cross-validated by RNA editing assays and differential scanning fluorimetry. We anticipate that, in vivo, the framework of an active plant RNA editosome triggers the release of DYW autoinhibition to ensure a controlled and coordinated cytidine deamination playing a key role in mitochondrial and chloroplast homeostasis.


Author(s):  
Sarah Schleicher ◽  
Stefan Binder

Abstract Key message RNA PROCESSING FACTORs 1 AND 8 (RPF1 and RPF8), both restorer of fertility like pentatricopeptide repeat proteins, are required for processing of dicistronic nad4L-atp4 and nad3-rps12 transcripts in Arabidopsis mitochondria. Abstract In mitochondria of Arabidopsis thaliana (Arabidopsis), the 5′ termini of many RNAs are generated on the post-transcriptional level. This process is still poorly understood in terms of both the underlying mechanism as well as proteins required. Our studies now link the generation of polymorphic 5′ extremities of the dicistronic nad3-rps12 and nad4L-atp4 transcripts to the function of the P-type pentatricopeptide repeat proteins RNA PROCESSING FACTORs 8 (RPF8) and 1 (RPF1). RPF8 is required to generate the nad3-rps12 -141 5′ end in ecotype Van-0 whereas the RPF8 allele in Col has no function in the generation of any 5′ terminus of this transcript. This observation strongly suggests the involvement of an additional factor in the generation of the -229 5′ end of nad3-rps12 transcripts in Col. RPF1, previously found to be necessary for the generation of the -228 5′ end of the major 1538 nucleotide-long nad4 mRNAs, is also important for the formation of nad4L-atp4 transcripts with a 5′ end at position -318 in Col. Many Arabidopsis ecotypes contain inactive RPF1 alleles resulting in the accumulation of various low abundant nad4L-atp4 RNAs which might represent precursor and/or degradation products. Some of these ecotypes accumulate major, but slightly smaller RNA species. The introduction of RPF1 into these lines not only establishes the formation of the major nad4L-atp4 dicistronic mRNA with the -318 5′ terminus, the presence of this gene also suppresses the accumulation of most alternative nad4L-atp4 RNAs. Beside RPF1, several other factors contribute to nad4L-atp4 transcript formation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xudong Zhao ◽  
Hanxu Wang ◽  
Hangyu Li ◽  
Yiming Wu ◽  
Guohua Wang

Motivation: Pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR), which is a triangular pentapeptide repeat domain, plays an important role in plant growth. Features extracted from sequences are applicable to PPR protein identification using certain classification methods. However, which components of a multidimensional feature (namely variables) are more effective for protein discrimination has never been discussed. Therefore, we seek to select variables from a multidimensional feature for identifying PPR proteins.Method: A framework of variable selection for identifying PPR proteins is proposed. Samples representing PPR positive proteins and negative ones are equally split into a training and a testing set. Variable importance is regarded as scores derived from an iteration of resampling, training, and scoring step on the training set. A model selection method based on Gaussian mixture model is applied to automatic choice of variables which are effective to identify PPR proteins. Measurements are used on the testing set to show the effectiveness of the selected variables.Results: Certain variables other than the multidimensional feature they belong to do work for discrimination between PPR positive proteins and those negative ones. In addition, the content of methionine may play an important role in predicting PPR proteins.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huanhuan Yang ◽  
Zhihui Xiu ◽  
Le Wang ◽  
Shi-Kai Cao ◽  
Xiulan Li ◽  
...  

Plants ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bastien Malbert ◽  
Matthias Burger ◽  
Mauricio Lopez-Obando ◽  
Kevin Baudry ◽  
Alexandra Launay-Avon ◽  
...  

C to U editing is one of the post-transcriptional steps which are required for the proper expression of chloroplast and mitochondrial genes in plants. It depends on several proteins acting together which include the PLS-class pentatricopeptide repeat proteins (PPR). DYW2 was recently shown to be required for the editing of many sites in both organelles. In particular almost all the sites associated with the E+ subfamily of PPR proteins are depending on DYW2, suggesting that DYW2 is required for the function of E+-type PPR proteins. Here we strengthened this link by identifying 16 major editing sites controlled by 3 PPR proteins: OTP90, a DYW-type PPR and PGN and MEF37, 2 E+-type PPR proteins. A re-analysis of the DYW2 editotype showed that the 49 sites known to be associated with the 18 characterized E+-type PPR proteins all depend on DYW2. Considering only the 288 DYW2-dependent editing sites as potential E+-type PPR sites, instead of the 795 known editing sites, improves the performances of binding predictions systems based on the PPR code for E+-type PPR proteins. However, it does not compensate for poor binding predictions.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florent Waltz ◽  
Heddy Soufari ◽  
Anthony Bochler ◽  
Philippe Giegé ◽  
Yaser Hashem

The vast majority of eukaryotic cells contain mitochondria, essential powerhouses and metabolic hubs1. These organelles have a bacterial origin and were acquired during an early endosymbiosis event2. Mitochondria possess specialized gene expression systems composed of various molecular machines including the mitochondrial ribosomes (mitoribosomes). Mitoribosomes are in charge of translating the few essential mRNAs still encoded by mitochondrial genomes3. While chloroplast ribosomes strongly resemble those of bacteria4,5, mitoribosomes have diverged significantly during evolution and present strikingly different structures across eukaryotic species6–10. In contrast to animals and trypanosomatides, plants mitoribosomes have unusually expanded ribosomal RNAs and conserved the short 5S rRNA, which is usually missing in mitoribosomes11. We have previously characterized the composition of the plant mitoribosome6revealing a dozen plant-specific proteins, in addition to the common conserved mitoribosomal proteins. In spite of the tremendous recent advances in the field, plant mitoribosomes remained elusive to high-resolution structural investigations, and the plant-specific ribosomal features of unknown structures. Here, we present a cryo-electron microscopy study of the plant 78S mitoribosome from cauliflower at near-atomic resolution. We show that most of the plant-specific ribosomal proteins are pentatricopeptide repeat proteins (PPR) that deeply interact with the plant-specific rRNA expansion segments. These additional rRNA segments and proteins reshape the overall structure of the plant mitochondrial ribosome, and we discuss their involvement in the membrane association and mRNA recruitment prior to translation initiation. Finally, our structure unveils an rRNA-constructive phase of mitoribosome evolution across eukaryotes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document