Cofactors for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 cDNA Integration In Vitro

ABSTRACT We have investigated the function of two DNA binding proteins that stimulate human immunodeficiency virus type 1 cDNA integration in vitro, the cellular HMGa1 protein and the viral nucleocapsid (NC) protein. Of the three forms of NC (NCp7, NCp9, and NCp15), we find that NCp9 is the most effective at increasing integration in vitro; thus, processing of NC may potentially modulate its activities during infection. We also found that maximal stimulation by NCp9 required roughly enough NC to coat the reactant DNAs whereas less HMGa1 was required, and the reactions displayed different optima for divalent metal cofactors and order of addition. These findings reveal probable distinct mechanisms of action in vitro.

Multiple Regulators of Ty1 Transposition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Have Conserved Roles in Genome Maintenance

Most Ty1 retrotransposons in the genome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae are transpositionally competent but rarely transpose. We screened yeast mutagenized by insertion of the mTn3-lacZ/LEU2 transposon for mutations that result in elevated Ty1 cDNA-mediated mobility, which occurs by cDNA integration or recombination. Here, we describe the characterization of mTn3 insertions in 21 RTT (regulation of Ty1 transposition) genes that result in 5- to 111-fold increases in Ty1 mobility. These 21 RTT genes are EST2, RRM3, NUT2, RAD57, RRD2, RAD50, SGS1, TEL1, SAE2, MED1, MRE11, SCH9, KAP122, and 8 previously uncharacterized genes. Disruption of RTT genes did not significantly increase Ty1 RNA levels but did enhance Ty1 cDNA levels, suggesting that most RTT gene products act at a step after mRNA accumulation but before cDNA integration. The rtt mutations had widely varying effects on integration of Ty1 at preferred target sites. Mutations in RTT101 and NUT2 dramatically stimulated Ty1 integration upstream of tRNA genes. In contrast, a mutation in RRM3 increased Ty1 mobility >100-fold without increasing integration upstream of tRNA genes. The regulation of Ty1 transposition by components of fundamental pathways required for genome maintenance suggests that Ty1 and yeast have coevolved to link transpositional dormancy to the integrity of the genome.

Retroviral cDNA Integration: Stimulation by HMG I Family Proteins

ABSTRACT To replicate, a retrovirus must synthesize a cDNA copy of the viral RNA genome and integrate that cDNA into a chromosome of the host. We have investigated the role of a host cell cofactor, HMG I(Y) protein, in integration of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and Moloney murine leukemia virus (MoMLV) cDNA. Previously we reported that HMG I(Y) cofractionates with HIV-1 preintegration complexes (PICs) isolated from freshly infected cells. PICs depleted of required components by treatment with high concentrations of salt could be reconstituted by addition of purified HMG I(Y) in vitro. Here we report studies using immunoprecipitation that indicate that HMG I(Y) is associated with MoMLV preintegration complexes. In mechanistic studies, we show for both HIV-1 and MoMLV that each HMG I(Y) monomer must contain multiple DNA binding domains to stimulate integration by HMG I(Y)-depleted PICs. We also find that HMG I(Y) can condense model HIV-1 or MoMLV cDNA in vitro as measured by stimulation of intermolecular ligation. This reaction, like reconstitution of integration, depends on the presence of multiple DNA binding domains in each HMG I(Y) monomer. These data suggest that binding of multivalent HMG I(Y) monomers to multiple cDNA sites compacts retroviral cDNA, thereby promoting formation of active integrase-cDNA complexes.

Chromosome Structure and Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 cDNA Integration: Centromeric Alphoid Repeats Are a Disfavored Target

ABSTRACT Integration of retroviral cDNA into host chromosomal DNA is an essential and distinctive step in viral replication. Despite considerable study, the host determinants of sites for integration have not been fully clarified. To investigate integration site selection in vivo, we used two approaches. (i) We have analyzed the host sequences flanking 61 human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) integration sites made by experimental infection and compared them to a library of 104 control sequences. (ii) We have also analyzed HIV-1 integration frequencies near several human repeated-sequence DNA families, using a repeat-specific PCR-based assay. At odds with previous reports from smaller-scale studies, we found no strong biases either for or against integration near repetitive sequences such as Alu or LINE-1 elements. We also did not find a clear bias for integration in transcription units as proposed previously, although transcription units were found somewhat more frequently near integration sites than near controls. However, we did find that centromeric alphoid repeats were selectively absent at integration sites. The repeat-specific PCR-based assay also indicated that alphoid repeats were disfavored for integration in vivo but not as naked DNA in vitro. Evidently the distinctive DNA organization at centromeres disfavors cDNA integration. We also found a weak consensus sequence for host DNA at integration sites, and assays of integration in vitro indicated that this sequence is favored as naked DNA, revealing in addition an influence of target primary sequence.