Patient perception of physician empathy in stroke telemedicine

Introduction We assessed patients’ perceptions of physician empathy during telemedicine consultations as compared to in-person consultations during clinical encounters for acute stroke. Methods This prospective cohort study was undertaken at a comprehensive stroke centre hub in collaboration with a distant community hospital spoke site. Eligible participants presented to hub or spoke emergency departments with suspected acute stroke within three hours of symptom onset. Participants were evaluated at the hub site in person or at the remote site via telemedicine by the same group of neurologists. Following acute care decisions, single-visit data including participant-reported assessments of physician empathy were collected within 24 h. The primary outcome was the Consultation and Relational Empathy score. The secondary outcome for the telemedicine cohort was the Telemedicine Patient Satisfaction Measure score. Results Between 31 May 2013–13 March 2019, 70 patients completed the study. Fifty patients were seen by telemedicine and 20 patients were seen in person. Median Consultation and Relational Empathy scores (with a possible score of 10–50) were 49 (range 27–50) for telemedicine and 45 (range 26–50) for in-person consultations (Wilcoxon rank sum p = 0.18). Each item of the Consultation and Relational Empathy questionnaire was rated very good or excellent by at least 87% of participants in the telemedicine group. The median Telemedicine Patient Satisfaction Measure score was 54 (range 12–60), with each item rated agree or strongly agree by at least 84% of participants. Discussion We found no difference between telemedicine and in-person visits in patient perception of physician empathy in acute stroke care. Therefore, we conclude that empathy can be conveyed by facial expression, voice and attentiveness in a telemedicine encounter and, in the setting of acute stroke care, does not require physical touch or proximity.

General practitioner identification and retention for people with spinal cord damage: establishing factors to inform a general practitioner satisfaction measure

People with spinal cord damage (SCD) report a high level of GP use. There is a dearth of research investigating factors that contribute to GP identification and retention for people with SCD. Furthermore, a GP satisfaction measure developed specifically for people with SCD is non-existent. This preliminary study sought to identify factors contributing to GP identification and retention. A total of 266 people with SCD primarily based in Queensland, Australia, completed a cross-sectional survey that aimed to fill these knowledge gaps. Descriptive statistics and correlational analyses clarified the factors contributing to GP identification and GP retention respectively. An exploratory factor analysis utilising the principal components analysis method clarified a set of items that could underpin key domains for a SCD-specific GP satisfaction measure. The findings confirm that knowledge about SCD, physically accessible services, and trust are seminal considerations aligned with GP identification and retention for people with SCD.