312 Effects of Bismuth Subsalicylate and Different Sulfate Concentrations on in vitro Ruminal Fermentation Using a Warm-season Perennial Hay Substrate

A randomized complete block design was used to evaluate the effects of bismuth subsalicylate (BSS) on in vitro ruminal fermentation with differing concentrations of sulfate. In vitro fermentation consisted of 50 mL of a 4:1 buffer:ruminal fluid inoculum and 0.7 g (pre-dehydrated) of substrate [WW-B Dahl bluestem hay (Bothriochloa bladhii)] incubated for 48 h (39oC). Treatments were arranged as a 3 × 4 factorial with concentration of sulfate (0.2, 2.9, or 5.6 g sulfate/L buffer) and BSS (0.0, 0.165, 0.330, or 0.495% substrate DM) as the main factors. In vitro organic matter digestibility (IVOMD), and CH4, H2S, and total gas production (TGP) were measured. Data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS with the fixed effects of BSS, sulfate, and their interaction. Incubation day (block) was considered a random effect. The average of 2 bottles within day was considered experimental unit. A BSS × sulfate interaction was observed for TGP (P = 0.040) and H2S production (P < 0.001), where BSS had a larger negative impact on TGP and production of H2S with greater concentrations of sulfate. A linear effect (P < 0.001) of sulfate was observed for CH4 production per gram of incubated OM, where CH4 was decreased as sulfate concentration increased. A quadratic effect of sulfate was observed for IVOMD (P = 0.010) and pH (P = 0.009). Production of H2S linearly decreased (P = 0.001) as BSS concentration increased. The addition of BSS to in vitro incubations did not affect (P > 0.10) any other variables measured. Bismuth subsalicylate does not appear to have negative effects on in vitro fermentation parameters while decreasing H2S production; however, elevated concentrations of sulfate in the buffer appears to have negative impacts on fermentation. Further in vivo research is warranted to support BSS supplementation to cattle with high dietary sulfate.

313 Effects of Bismuth Subsalicylate on Ruminal Fermentation of Cattle Consuming a Feedlot Diet

A replicated 3 × 3 Latin square was used to determine the effects of bismuth subsalicylate on ruminal fermentation parameters of beef cattle consuming a feedlot diet. Six ruminally-cannulated Angus-crossbred steers (n = 3; 573 ± 105 kg BW) and heifers (n = 3; 553 ± 77 kg BW) were assigned 1 of 3 treatments: 1) low sulfur (S = 0.27% diet DM; LSUL); 2) high sulfur (S = 0.38% diet DM; HSUL); and 3) HSUL + 0.33% bismuth subsalicylate in diet DM; (BSS). Cattle were adapted to treatments for 14 d followed by 7 d of collections. Ruminal gas cap samples were collected at 0, 4, 8, and 12 h post-feeding on d 14, and ruminal fluid samples were collected on d 15 every 3 h post-feeding for 24 h. Data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS. Treatment tended (P = 0.099) to affect H2S concentration where BSS and LSUL were 50 and 61% lesser when compared to HSUL, respectively. A tendency (P = 0.061) was also observed for concentration of NH3-N where HSUL and BSS were lesser than CTRL. There was also a tendency for a treatment effect (P = 0.082) where HSUL had a lower pH than LSUL with BSS being intermediate. Furthermore, treatment tended (P = 0.0712) to affect the concentration of acetate where HSUL was lesser than BSS. No effect of treatment (P ≥ 0.124) was observed on total VFA concentration nor concentrations of butyrate, propionate, or valerate (P ≥ 0.138). Treatment tended (P = 0.084) to affect branched chain VFA concentration where BSS decreased concentrations compared to LSUL. Molar proportions of the major VFA were not impacted by treatment (P ≥ 0.100). In conclusion, BSS appears to decrease H2S production in the rumen without having negative effects on the fermentation profile.

Structure of the active pharmaceutical ingredient bismuth subsalicylate

Structure determination of pharmaceutical compounds is invaluable for drug development but is challenging for those that form as small crystals with defects. Bismuth subsalicylate (BSS), among the most commercially significant bismuth compounds, is an active ingredient in over-the-counter medications such as Pepto-Bismol, used to treat dyspepsia and H. pylori infections. Despite its century-long history, the structure has remained unknown. Three-dimensional electron diffraction and hierarchical clustering analysis were applied on select data from ordered crystals, revealing a layered structure. In other less ordered crystals, high-resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy revealed variations in the stacking of layers. Together, these modern electron crystallography techniques provide a new toolbox for structure determination of active pharmaceutical ingredients and drug discovery, demonstrated by this study of BSS.

Effects of Bismuth Subsalicylate and Encapsulated Calcium-Ammonium Nitrate on Feedlot Beef Cattle Production

Two experiments were performed to evaluate the effects of bismuth subsalicylate (BSS) and calcium-ammonium nitrate (CAN) on in vitro ruminal fermentation, growth, apparent total tract digestibility of nutrients, liver mineral concentration, and carcass quality of beef cattle. In Exp. 1, 4 ruminally cannulated steers [520 ± 30 kg body weight (BW)] were used as donors to perform a batch culture and an in vitro organic matter digestibility (IVOMD) procedure. Treatments were arranged in a 2 × 2 factorial with factors being BSS [0 or 0.33% of substrate dry matter (DM)] and CAN (0 or 2.22% of substrate DM). In Exp. 2, 200 Angus-crossbred steers (385 ± 27 kg BW) were blocked by BW and allocated to 50 pens (4 steers/pen) in a randomized complete block design with a 2 × 2 + 1 factorial arrangement of treatments. Factors included BSS (0 or 0.33% of the diet DM) and non-protein nitrogen (NPN) source [urea or encapsulated CAN (eCAN) included at 0.68 or 2.0% of the diet, respectively] with 0.28% ruminally available S (RAS). A low S diet was included as a positive control containing urea (0.68% of DM) and 0.14% RAS. For Exp. 1, data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS with the fixed effects of BSS, CAN, BSS × CAN, and the random effect of donor. For Exp. 2, the MIXED procedure of SAS was used for continuous variables and the GLIMMIX procedure for categorical data. For Exp. 1, no differences (P > 0.230) were observed for IVOMD. There was a tendency (P = 0.055) for an interaction regarding H2S production. Acetate:propionate increased (P = 0.003) with the addition of CAN. In Exp. 2, there was a NPN source effect (P = 0.032) where steers consuming urea had greater carcass-adjusted final shrunk BW than those consuming eCAN. Intake of DM (P < 0.001) and carcass-adjusted average daily gain (P = 0.024) were reduced by eCAN; however, it did not affect (P = 0.650) carcass-adjusted feed efficiency. Steers consuming urea had greater (P = 0.032) hot carcass weight, and a BSS × NPN interaction (P = 0.019) was observed on calculated yield grade. Apparent absorption of S decreased (P < 0.001) with the addition of BSS. Final liver Cu concentration was reduced (P = 0.042) by 58% in cattle fed BSS, indicating that BSS may decrease Cu absorption and storage in the liver. The results observed in this experiment indicate that BSS does not have negative effects on feedlot steer performance whereas CAN may hinder performance of steers fed finishing diets.