Does endometrioma surgery affect assisted reproductive technologies cycle outcome in patients with decreased ovarian reserve diagnosed by Bologna criteria?

Objectives: Data regarding whether the assisted reproductive technologies (ART) outcome of patients with decreased ovarian reserve (DOR) secondary to an endometrioma surgery differs from that of patients with DOR secondary to other etiologies is limited. The aim of this study was to compare the ART outcomes of DOR patients diagnosed by Bologna criteria secondary to a previous endometrioma surgery with DOR patients without a history of an endometrioma surgery. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in the assisted reproduction unit of a tertiary research and education hospital. Medical records of the patients with DOR were reviewed retrospectively. Group I included 23 cycles of DOR patients secondary to a previous endometrioma surgery and Group II consisted of 260 cycles of DOR patients without a history of endometrioma surgery. Results: No significant difference was demonstrated between groups regarding demographic features except for the age (32 (24–41) in Group I vs 35 (23–47) in Group II, p = 0.031). The data comparing the controlled ovarian stimulation parameters and ART outcomes showed similar results in both groups. No statistically significant difference was found between groups regarding pregnancy rates per transfer (23% vs 22.2 %) and per cycle (13% vs 15.4%) ( p > 0.05). Conclusion: Cycle outcomes of DOR patients secondary to an endometrioma surgery did not differ from that of DOR without an endometrioma surgery history.

Live birth rates in different subgroups of poor ovarian responders according to Bologna and POSEIDON group classification criteria

Background: Live birth rates (LBRs) have been separately evaluated in two poor ovarian responder (POR) classification methods. We designed the present study to compare the LBRs according to Bologna criteria or Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing IndividualizeD Oocyte Number (POSEIDON) group classifications to determine the important predictive factors for LBR in patients with POR. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we evaluated a database that contained clinical and laboratory information on infertility treatment cycles of all patients with at least one POR after standard controlled ovarian stimulation (COH) during in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles from December 2015 to December 2017. The eligible data were collected and the subjects divided into five groups according to Bologna criteria and four groups according to POSEIDON group classification. Results: We assessed 812 patients diagnosed with POR; overall, 517 underwent embryo transfer (ET) during the last treatment cycle (63.6%). The results indicated a total clinical pregnancy rate of 19.3% (100 cases) and LBR of 16.1% (86 cases). According to Bologna criteria, 41 patients were not included in any group. Analysis of treatment cycle outcome showed that patients classified as Bologna group II had a higher LBR than the other groups. In terms of POSEIDON classification, all of the patients could be classified into groups. Patients in POSEIDON group 3 had the highest LBR. According to multivariable regression analysis, the significant independent variables that remained in the model as important predictive factors for live births were the number and quality (good and excellent) of the embryos transferred, and POSEIDON group 3 classification. Conclusion: The results indicated that the POSEIDON group classification could be more comprehensive and practical than Bologna criteria for diagnosing and categorizing POR patients. In addition, we noted that the number and quality of transferred embryos were the most important prognostic factors for live births in POR patients. Therefore, we suggest that clinicians consider COH protocols that have a freezing embryo strategy and the collection of more good quality embryos to improve the probability of a live birth.

Novel Physiology and Definition of Poor Ovarian Response; Clinical Recommendations

Poor ovarian response (POR) to controlled ovarian stimulation (OS) presents a major challenge in assisted reproduction. The Bologna criteria represented the first serious attempt to set clear criteria for the definition of POR. However, the Bologna criteria were questioned because of the persistent heterogeneity among POR patients and the inability to provide management strategies. Based on these facts, a more recent classification, the POSEIDON (Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing IndividualizeD Oocyte Number) classification, was developed to provide a homogeneous and refined definition of POR that significantly reduces the heterogeneity of the Bologna criteria definition of POR and helps in the clinical handling and counseling of patients. In this review, we discuss the impact of the POSEIDON classification on the clinical management of patients with POR.

Live birth rates in different subgroups of poor ovarian responders according to Bologna criteria and POSEIDON group classification

Background Recently, some studies evaluated the live births rates (LBRs) in two poor ovarian responders (POR) classification methods separately, but present study was designed to compare the LBRs among different groups of patients on the basis of Bologna criteria or POSIEDON group classifications and find the important predictive factors for LBR in patients with POR. Methods In this cross-sectional study, the database containing clinical and laboratory information on infertility treatment cycles were evaluated from December 2015 to December 2017 and all the patients with at least one POR after standard controlled ovarian stimulation (COH) during IVF/ICSI cycles were evaluated. The eligible patients were enrolled and divided into five and four groups according to the Bologna criteria and POSEIDON groups’ classifications, respectively. Results 812 patients with POR diagnosis were investigated which in overall 517 of them had embryo transfer in the last treatment cycle (63.6%) and total clinical pregnancy rate 19.3% (100 cases) and live birth rates 16.1% (86 cases) were found. When the patients were grouped on the Basis of the POSEIDON classification, the highest LBR was observed in the POSEIDON group III. On the other hand, according to the Bologna criteria, 41 patients were not included in any group, and in the analysis of cycle outcome, the LBR in the Bologna group II was more than other groups. The multivariable regression analysis revealed that the significant independent variables remained in the model as important predictive factor for live births in the study population were the number and quality of the transferred embryos transmission (good and excellent quality), and the POSSIDON classification group (POSSIDON group III). Conclusions On the basis of present results, the POSEIDON group classification could be more comprehensive and practical than Bologna criteria for diagnosing and categorizing POR patients. In addition, it was found the number and quality of transferred embryos were the most important prognostic factor for live birth in POR patients; therefore we suggest to consider COH protocols with a freezing embryos strategy, and the collection of more good quality embryos to improve the probability of a live birth.

Live birth rates in different subgroups of poor ovarian responders according to Bologna criteria and POSEIDON group classification

Background Recently, some studies evaluated the live births rates (LBRs) in two poor ovarian responders (POR) classification methods separately, but present study was designed to compare the LBRs among different groups of patients on the basis of Bologna criteria or POSIEDON group classifications and find the important predictive factors for LBR in patients with POR.Methods In this cross-sectional study, the database containing clinical and laboratory information on infertility treatment cycles were evaluated from December 2015 to December 2017 and all the patients with at least one POR after standard controlled ovarian stimulation (COH) during IVF/ICSI cycles were evaluated. The eligible patients were enrolled and divided into five and four groups according to the Bologna criteria and POSEIDON groups’ classifications, respectively.Results 812 patients with POR diagnosis were investigated which in overall 517 of them had embryo transfer in the last treatment cycle (63.6%) and total clinical pregnancy rate 19.3% (100 cases) and live birth rates 16.1% (86 cases) were found. When the patients were grouped on the Basis of the POSEIDON classification, the highest LBR was observed in the POSEIDON group III. On the other hand, according to the Bologna criteria, 41 patients were not included in any group, and in the analysis of cycle outcome, the LBR in the Bologna group II was more than other groups. The multivariable regression analysis revealed that the significant independent variables remained in the model as important predictive factor for live births in the study population were the number and quality of the transferred embryos transmission (good and excellent quality), and the POSSIDON classification group (POSSIDON group III).ConclusionsOn the basis of present results, the POSEIDON group classification could be more comprehensive and practical than Bologna criteria for diagnosing and categorizing POR patients. In addition, it was found the number and quality of transferred embryos were the most important prognostic factor for live birth in POR patients; therefore we suggest to consider COH protocols with a freezing embryos strategy, and the collection of more good quality embryos to improve the probability of a live birth.

Update on the management of poor ovarian response in IVF: the shift from Bologna criteria to the Poseidon concept

Despite the considerate progress to which assisted reproduction technology (ART) has been subject since 1978, some issues remain unresolved. Notably, the clinical management of patients with a poor ovarian response is still a challenge in everyday practice, frustrating to both the patient and the fertility expert. Poor ovarian responders (PORs) embody 9–24% of patients undergoing ovarian stimulation, meaning that up to one in four patients conceals a poor reproductive prognosis. The last decade has witnessed the attempts of the medical community to standardize diagnosis of POR with the developing of the Bologna Criteria and the subsequent evolution of the low prognosis patient elaborated in the POSEIDON classification. The aim of this article is to summarize all evidence concerning etiology and management of poor ovarian response, including the most recent advances and future prospects in this regard.