Have We Lost Sight of the Women? An Observational Study About Normality-Centred Care in Australian Maternity Services.

Objective • Prioritising normal birth has led to harm in some instances in the UK • Australian organisations have also promoted normal birth in maternity practice • The negative impact of normal birth appears less well understood in Australia • The study explores this impact of normal birth promotion and the quality of clinical incident investigations Design • Survey-based research design Setting • Online survey Population or Sample • Australian maternity health care providers Methods • Open and close-ended questions on the survey • The survey received 1278 responses • Data analysed using SPSS software Main Outcome Measures • Perceptions on bias against or delay in interventions • Perceptions on systemic attempts to reduce caesarean rates • Perceptions on clinical incident investigations and the engagement of women in these processes Results • Promoting normal birth may by introduce bias against or delay interventions • Attempts to reduce caesarean section rates may reduce the agency of the woman to choose how she births • Incident investigations appear to be independent and improve outcomes for mothers and babies • Women with birth trauma appear to lack support and follow up postnatally Conclusions • Current regulatory standards for maternity services may need to be re-evaluated • Key performance indicators for maternity services need to change to reflect core ethical and legal obligations around informed consent

General Practitioners providing obstetric care in New Zealand. What differentiates GPs who continue to deliver babies?

ABSTRACT AIM To identify factors that have enabled some New Zealand general practitioner obstetricians (GPOs) to continue providing maternity care and factors implicated in decisions to withdraw from maternity care. METHOD Semi-structured interviews and one focus group (n = 3) were conducted with 23 current and former GPOs. Interviews were transcribed and analysed thematically. RESULTS Current and former GPOs practiced maternity care because they enjoyed being involved in the birth process and delivery suite environment. Their maternity practice was framed by a philosophy of lifelong continuity of care for patients. Legislative changes in New Zealand and barriers to shared care that resulted in many GPOs withdrawing from maternity care left remaining GPOs feeling professionally isolated; another reason for ceasing maternity care. Funding was perceived to be inadequate and on-call demands were both major disincentives to providing maternity and intrapartum care. Current GPOs often have strong supportive local relationships with other maternity providers when compared with those no longer practicing. Local shared care arrangements enhance professional support and reduce professional isolation. CONCLUSION GPOs still practicing in New Zealand do so because they find maternity care highly rewarding despite their perceptions that the current maternity care model is incompatible with general practice. They have often developed local solutions that support their practice, particularly around shared care arrangements.