sociotropy and autonomy
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

48
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

17
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
Ryan Cardinale ◽  
Margo W. Menkes ◽  
Carolyn M. Andrews ◽  
Christian A. Webb ◽  
Manish K. Jha ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ruth Martínez ◽  
Carmen Senra ◽  
José Fernández-Rey ◽  
Hipólito Merino

The relationships between dimensions of personality (sociotropy and autonomy), coping strategies (rumination: brooding and reflection subtypes, and immature defenses) and symptoms of depression and anxiety were explored in patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD). A total of 279 patients completed questionnaires including measures of personality dimensions, rumination, immature defenses, depression and anxiety. Our findings suggested that sociotropy and autonomy may be associated with both depressive and anxious symptoms in patients with MDD and with GAD. Multiple mediation analyses indicated that brooding always acted as a mediating link between personality vulnerabilities (sociotropy and autonomy) and depressive and anxiety symptoms, independently of the patient group. In addition, in patients with MDD and those with GAD, brooding and immature defenses functioned together by linking sociotropy and autonomy, respectively, with depressive symptoms. Our results also showed that, in patients with GAD, both types of rumination explained the relationship between sociotropy and autonomy and anxiety symptoms. Overall, our findings provided evidence of the transdiagnostic role of the brooding, linking the vulnerability of personality dimensions and emotional symptoms. They also indicated that reflection and immature defenses can operate in conjunction with brooding, depending on the type of vulnerability and emotional context.


2014 ◽  
Vol 55 (7) ◽  
pp. 1643-1646 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koichi Otani ◽  
Akihito Suzuki ◽  
Yoshihiko Matsumoto ◽  
Ryoichi Sadahiro ◽  
Masanori Enokido ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 52 (5) ◽  
pp. 507-510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koichi Otani ◽  
Akihito Suzuki ◽  
Mitsuhiro Kamata ◽  
Yoshihiko Matsumoto ◽  
Naoshi Shibuya ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 928-943 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier Grondin ◽  
Elizabeth I. Johnson ◽  
Mathilde Husky ◽  
Joel Swendsen

2010 ◽  
Vol 106 (2) ◽  
pp. 394-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mattias Desmet ◽  
Stijn Vanheule ◽  
Reitske Meganck ◽  
Paul Verhaeghe

The Personal Style Inventory–II (Robins, Ladd, Welkowitz, Blaney, Diaz, & Kutcher, 1994) was constructed to assess sociotropy and autonomy; two personality dimensions associated with increased susceptibility to depression. In the present study, the authors used a confirmatory factor analysis to evaluate the fit of the theoretical model of the Personal Style Inventory–II in a heterogeneous clinical sample ( N = 266) and in a student sample ( N = 799); construct validity was evaluated by correlating the Personal Style Inventory–II scales with the scales of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems–64 and the Symptom Checklist-90–R. Poor fit of the original Personal Style Inventory–II model was observed in both samples. Yet, after progressive elimination of 18 items, a good fit was obtained in the clinical sample and replicated in the student sample. This brief version demonstrated better construct validity than the long version, especially in a depressed clinical sample: sociotropy was associated with nonassertive, overly accommodating, and self-sacrificing interpersonal behaviour, depressive symptoms, phobic complaints, and anxiety and somatic symptoms; autonomy was associated with cold and vindictive interpersonal behaviour, obsessive–compulsive symptoms, and aggressive urges. In contrast to the long version, scores on the shortened version showed the predicted sex differences.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document