tibial eminence fracture
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

33
(FIVE YEARS 4)

H-INDEX

9
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaohui XU ◽  
Huayi WANG ◽  
Feng GUO ◽  
Fengguo CUI

Abstract Background: The aim of this paper is to evaluate the early clinical efficacy and complications of arthroscopic treatment of tibial eminence fracture (TEF) with button plates.Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients with TEF fracture treated by arthroscopic surgery was performed. Clinical subjective evaluation included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, Lysholm knee score, and visual analog scale (VAS). The knee joint scores were evaluated according to the Lysholm score. Clinical objective assessment included the Lachman test, anterior drawer test (ADT), IKDC, and the range of motion. The patient's quality of life was measured using a life summary table. Assessment of fracture healing and internal fixation was performed on lateral X-rays of the knee joint. The patients’ satisfaction was measured and evaluated at the last follow-up in accordance with Marsh criteria. RESULTS: There were 22 patients (22 knees) with a mean age of 33.64 ± 8.60 years. The mean follow-up was 28.36 ± 2.79 months. The difference in Lachman test and ADT before and after the operation was statistically significant. According to the IKDC classification, there were 11 cases with type A, 9 cases with type B, and 2 cases with type C. According to the intra-articular button position classification, the rate of ideal position was 100%. The satisfaction rate was 81.8%.CONCLUSIONS: Day surgery using double-button plates to treat TEF can achieve anatomical reduction, power and stability, and good clinical efficacy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7_suppl3) ◽  
pp. 2325967121S0002
Author(s):  
Ryan O’Donnell ◽  
Steven Bokshan ◽  
Kelsey Brown ◽  
Julien T Aoyama ◽  
Theodore J Ganley ◽  
...  

Background: While operative treatment of displaced pediatric tibial eminence fractures has generally been shown to be safe, post-operative complications including arthrofibrosis, infection, fixation failure, and postoperative ipsilateral ACL injuries remain prevalent. The purpose of this study was to describe the prevalence of and risk factors for post-operative ACL tears in a cohort of patients surgically treated for tibial eminence fracture. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of children undergoing treatment of a tibial eminence fracture at 10 tertiary children’s hospitals.. The primary outcome was subsequent ACL rupture. Patients with 2 year follow up data and those that had met the primary outcome within the 2 year period, were analyzed for demographics, risk factors and survival analyses Results: 385 pediatric patients were reviewed. Overall, 46 patients had either 2 year follow up data or met the primary outcome measure of an ACL tear prior to the 2 year mark. Mean age was 11.2 years old (SD 2.8), and the median follow time was 36.4 months (SD 17.7 months) There was a 21.7% incidence of subsequent ACL tear in the cohort analyzed. Subsequent ACL tears occurred at a median of 10.2 months (SD 19.5 months) postoperatively. There was a statistically significant association with higher Myers & McKeever grade tibial spine fractures (Type III and IV) and subsequent ACL rupture ( p=0.006). Subsequent ACL tears occurred in patients who were older when they had their original tibial eminence fracture, 13.4 years old versus 11.3 years old ( p=0.035). There was no statistically significant relationship between ipsilateral ACL tear and body mass index, operative time, fixation method used, postoperative weight bearing status, type of postoperative immobilization, contact versus non-contact injury mechanism, type of post-operative physical therapy protocol based on chi-squared or t-test ( p>0.05). Conclusion: Subsequent ipsilateral ACL tears following operatively treated pediatric tibial eminence fractures in a large multicenter cohort occurred at a rate of 21.7%. They were associated with completely displaced (Type III or IV) tibial eminence fractures, and older patients. Clinicians should therefore continue to follow patients for at least 2 years after treatment of pediatric tibial eminence fractures in order to track this potential complication. [Table: see text]


Author(s):  
Shreekantha K. S. ◽  
Gowthamapradhaban N. ◽  
Deepak Malik ◽  
Mahendranath .

<p class="abstract">In this study outcomes of arthroscopic management of tibial eminence fracture have been described. We conducted a study of 15 patients of ACL avulsion fractures especially Meyer and Mckeever type II and III treated arthroscopically by pull through sutures. Outcome measures were assessed through International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form, Tenger Activity scale and Lysholm knee score. The study group consisted of 15 patients who met the inclusion criteria, of which 9 were male and 6 were female. The range of patient age consisted of 13-37 years and the average patient age was 20.6 years. The average male age was 22.11 years and the average female age was 18.33 years. The fracture classification showed 7 being type II while 8 were type III. Tegner Activity level at follow up ranged from 5-8 and the mean score was 6.4. On follow-up evaluation, the mean Lysholm score was 92.8 (ranging from 76-100). 6 patients who had inter-meniscal interposition was retracted or resected showed no difference in functional outcome. We found that displaced tibial eminence fractures could be successfully treated using arthroscopic pull through sutures, with most patients returning to their previous activity level. Complications were avoided by anatomic reduction of fracture fragments and early post-operative rehabilitation.</p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 263502542199278
Author(s):  
Gehron P. Treme ◽  
Dustin L. Richter

Background: Tibial eminence fractures account for up to 5% of knee injuries with an effusion in the pediatric population. Displaced fractures require reduction and operative fixation via arthroscopic or open techniques. Indications: Arthroscopic suture fixation and screw fixation are 2 of the most commonly described techniques for tibial eminence fracture treatment. We describe our preferred technique of arthroscopic suture fixation given the versatility of this technique and decreased risks of hardware irritation or impingement, need for reoperation, and minimal risk of physeal damage. Technique Description: The arthroscopic suture fixation technique uses a standard anteromedial and anterolateral portal. After the fracture bed and hematoma are debrided and any interposing structures (ie, meniscus) are removed from the fracture site, 2 nonabsorbable sutures are passed through the substance of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Using an ACL guide, 2 separate transtibial tunnels are drilled with a bone bridge in between—one at the anterolateral aspect of the fracture base and one at the anteromedial aspect. One limb from each suture is pulled out from each of the bone tunnels. The fragment is then reduced, and the sutures are tensioned and fixated using knotless suture anchors. Results: Overall prognosis following tibial eminence fracture fixation is favorable with more than 80% of patients returning to prior level of activity. Arthrofibrosis may occur in up to 25% of patients. Although some residual laxity may remain, there is a high return to sport and no difference in rate of subsequent ACL injury or surgery compared with a match cohort of pediatric ACL reconstructions. Discussion: Arthroscopic suture fixation of displaced tibial eminence fractures is a reliable technique with high return to sport and low risk of reoperation. Arthrofibrosis is common; thus, early, controlled knee range of motion following surgery is critical.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. S675-S680
Author(s):  
M. Wesley Honeycutt ◽  
Anna J. Rambo ◽  
Daniel P. Zieman ◽  
Prasit Nimityongskul

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (sup1) ◽  
pp. S144-S145
Author(s):  
P. Pennequin ◽  
J.-B Pic ◽  
C. Breque ◽  
P. Bouget ◽  
J.-P Richer ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Travis J. Menge ◽  
Jorge Chahla ◽  
Justin J. Mitchell ◽  
Chase S. Dean ◽  
Robert F. LaPrade

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document