Risk of Foot Ulcer and Lower-Extremity Amputation Among Participants in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Study

Objective: Intensive glycemic control reduces risk of kidney, retinal, and neurologic complications in type 1 diabetes (T1D), but whether it reduces risk of lower extremity complications is unknown. We examined whether former intensive versus conventional glycemic control among Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) participants with T1D reduced the long-term risk of diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) and lower extremity amputations (LEA) in the subsequent Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) study. <p>Research Design and Methods: DCCT participants [n=1441] completed 6.5 years on average of intensive vs conventional diabetes treatment, after which 1408 were enrolled in EDIC and followed annually over 23 years for DFU and LEA occurrences by physical examination. Multivariable Cox models estimated associations of DCCT treatment assignment and time-updated exposures with DFU or LEA. </p> <p>Results: Intensive versus conventional glycemic control was associated with a significant risk reduction for all DFU (Hazard Ratio [HR] 0.77, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.97), and a similar magnitude but nonsignificant risk reduction for first recorded DFU (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.03) and first LEA (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.36). In adjusted Cox models, clinical neuropathy, lower sural nerve conduction velocity and cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy were associated with higher DFU risk; eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m², albuminuria, and macular edema with higher LEA risk; and any retinopathy and greater time-weighted mean DCCT/EDIC HbA1c with higher risk of both outcomes (p<0.05).</p> <p>Conclusions: Early intensive glycemic control decreases long-term DFU risk, the most important antecedent in the causal pathway to LEA.</p>

Risk of Foot Ulcer and Lower-Extremity Amputation Among Participants in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Study

Objective: Intensive glycemic control reduces risk of kidney, retinal, and neurologic complications in type 1 diabetes (T1D), but whether it reduces risk of lower extremity complications is unknown. We examined whether former intensive versus conventional glycemic control among Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) participants with T1D reduced the long-term risk of diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) and lower extremity amputations (LEA) in the subsequent Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) study. <p>Research Design and Methods: DCCT participants [n=1441] completed 6.5 years on average of intensive vs conventional diabetes treatment, after which 1408 were enrolled in EDIC and followed annually over 23 years for DFU and LEA occurrences by physical examination. Multivariable Cox models estimated associations of DCCT treatment assignment and time-updated exposures with DFU or LEA. </p> <p>Results: Intensive versus conventional glycemic control was associated with a significant risk reduction for all DFU (Hazard Ratio [HR] 0.77, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.97), and a similar magnitude but nonsignificant risk reduction for first recorded DFU (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.03) and first LEA (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.36). In adjusted Cox models, clinical neuropathy, lower sural nerve conduction velocity and cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy were associated with higher DFU risk; eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m², albuminuria, and macular edema with higher LEA risk; and any retinopathy and greater time-weighted mean DCCT/EDIC HbA1c with higher risk of both outcomes (p<0.05).</p> <p>Conclusions: Early intensive glycemic control decreases long-term DFU risk, the most important antecedent in the causal pathway to LEA.</p>

Risk of Foot Ulcer and Lower-Extremity Amputation Among Participants in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Study

OBJECTIVE Intensive glycemic control reduces the risk of kidney, retinal, and neurologic complications in type 1 diabetes (T1D), but whether it reduces the risk of lower-extremity complications is unknown. We examined whether former intensive versus conventional glycemic control among Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) participants with T1D reduced the long-term risk of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) and lower-extremity amputations (LEAs) in the subsequent Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) study. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS DCCT participants (n = 1,441) completed 6.5 years on average of intensive versus conventional diabetes treatment, after which 1,408 were enrolled in EDIC and followed annually over 23 years for DFU and LEA occurrences by physical examination. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models estimated associations of DCCT treatment assignment and time-updated exposures with DFU or LEA. RESULTS Intensive versus conventional glycemic control was associated with a significant risk reduction for all DFUs (hazard ratio 0.77 [95% CI 0.60, 0.97]) and a similar magnitude but nonsignificant risk reduction for first-recorded DFUs (0.78 [0.59, 1.03]) and first LEAs (0.70 [0.36, 1.36]). In adjusted Cox models, clinical neuropathy, lower sural nerve conduction velocity, and cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy were associated with higher DFU risk; estimated glomerular filtration rate &lt;60 mL/min/1.73 m2, albuminuria, and macular edema with higher LEA risk; and any retinopathy and greater time-weighted mean DCCT/EDIC HbA1c with higher risk of both outcomes (P &lt; 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Early intensive glycemic control decreases long-term DFU risk, the most important antecedent in the causal pathway to LEA.

Early and Intensive Glycemic Control for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing: A Prospective Observational Nested Cohort Study

We aimed to assess the effect of glycemic control on diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) healing. A prospective nested cohort study was employed of individuals with poorly controlled diabetes (glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c] >9%) and neuropathic DFU of >2-week duration. All individuals received standard diabetes and ulcer interventions for 12 weeks. Baseline demographic characteristics, ulcer area (automated assessment by wound zoom camera), and biochemical parameters were analyzed. The cohort was stratified into ulcer healed and unhealed groups. Ulcer area and glycemic parameters at 4 and 12 weeks on follow up were compared. Forty-three individuals (47 DFU) with baseline HbA1c 11.6% and ulcer area 9.87 cm2 were enrolled. After 12 weeks, mean HbA1c was 7.2%, 17 ulcers closed (healed group) and 30 ulcers did not close (unhealed group). The median time to ulcer healing was 10 weeks. Individuals in the healed group had lower fasting blood glucose ( P = .010), postprandial blood glucose ( P = .006), and HbA1c at 4 weeks ( P = .001), and 12 weeks (0.018) compared to the unhealed group. Cox-regression analysis that revealed lower baseline ulcer area ( P = .013) and HbA1c at 4 weeks ( P = .009) significantly predicted DFU healing by 12 weeks. Baseline ulcer area of >10.58 cm2 and HbA1c at 4 weeks of >8.15% predicted delayed DFU healing. In conclusion, early and intensive glycemic control in the first 4 weeks of treatment initiation is associated with greater healing of DFU independent of initial ulcer area.

Abstract MP14: White Matter Hyperintensity Progression, Macroalbuminuria, and Intensive Glycemic Control in Diabetics

Introduction: White matter hyperintensity (WMH) is associated with a higher risk of stroke, dementia, and depression. Prior research has suggested that renal impairment and diabetes may predispose to the development of WMH. Here, we evaluated the association between WMH volume (WMHv), macroalbuminuria, and glycemic control in a cohort of diabetic patients. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) dataset. The primary outcome is WMH progression in mL, evaluated by fitting linear regression to WMHv on the month 40 MRI and including the WMHv on the baseline MRI in the model. The primary predictors were incident macroalbuminuria, defined as new onset urinary albumin >300mg/day, and the ACCORD glucose randomization arm. Results: We included 502 patients. The mean (SD) WMHv at baseline was 2.1 (3.9) mL and at month 40 was 3.6 (5.7) mL. Twenty-three patients (4.6%) developed macroalbuminuria during the study period, who had a higher mean WMH progression (2.9 vs. 1.4 mL, p=0.012). In a linear regression model adjusted for mean systolic blood pressure during follow-up, macroalbuminuria was a significant predictor of WMH progression (Beta 1.20, 95% CI 0.17-2.22, p=0.022). In the same model, the interaction term between glucose randomization arm and macroalbuminuria was highly significant (Beta 3.38, 95% CI 1.20-5.57, p=0.003). The predicted follow-up WMHv for the interaction term are in Figure 1, showing that macroalbuminuria with intensive glycated hemoglobin reduction (goal A1c<6%) was associated with the most WMH progression. Conclusion: In diabetic patients, the development of macroalbuminuria was associated with WMH progression over 40 months, although only in patients assigned to intensive glycemic control. This finding is consistent with the adverse events seen in ACCORD with intensive glycemic control.

Intensive Glycemic Control for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing: A Multicentric, Randomized, Parallel Arm, Single-Blind, Controlled Study Protocol (INGLOBE Study)

Hyperglycemia impairs healing of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU). But there is no evidence regarding benefit of intensive glucose control for healing of DFU. We plan to conduct a randomized, parallel arm, controlled study to assess the role of intensive glycemic management in comparison to conventional glucose control for healing of DFU. Participants with neuropathic DFU (infected or uninfected) having hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) >8% and without evidence of osteomyelitis from 7 tertiary care hospitals will be enrolled. They will undergo a 2-week run-in phase for optimization of comorbidities, ulcer debridement, and counseling regarding self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). Subsequently, they will be randomized to “intensive glycemic control” arm defined by glycemic targets of fasting blood glucose (FBG) <130 mg/dL, postprandial BG <180 mg/dL, and HbA1c <8%, with basal-bolus insulin regimen and frequent titration of insulin to achieve glycemic targets. The “conventional” arm will continue on prior treatment (oral antidiabetic drugs) with no titration unless meeting rescue criteria. Ulcer area will be calculated by automated wound assessment device (WoundlyClinial app) weekly for first 4 weeks, and less frequently until the 24th week. Standard treatment for DFU, off-loading, and counseling for foot care will be provided in both arms. The primary outcome measure will be number of wounds closed at 12th and 24th weeks. A multivariate regression analysis will be performed to identify the predictors of wound healing with baseline HbA1c, diabetes duration, wound size, wound duration, and background therapies as independent variable. This study will provide the much needed guidance to set optimum glucose targets in people with DFU.