comparative chromosome painting
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

45
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

18
(FIVE YEARS 0)

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. e0259905
Author(s):  
Carlos A. Carvalho ◽  
Ivanete O. Furo ◽  
Patricia C. M. O’Brien ◽  
Jorge Pereira ◽  
Rebeca E. O’Connor ◽  
...  

Although most birds show karyotypes with diploid number (2n) around 80, with few macrochromosomes and many microchromosomes pairs, some groups, such as the Accipitriformes, are characterized by a large karyotypic reorganization, which resulted in complements with low diploid numbers, and a smaller number of microchromosomal pairs when compared to other birds. Among Accipitriformes, the Accipitridae family is the most diverse and includes, among other subfamilies, the subfamily Aquilinae, composed of medium to large sized species. The Black-Hawk-Eagle (Spizaetus tyrannus-STY), found in South America, is a member of this subfamily. Available chromosome data for this species includes only conventional staining. Hence, in order to provide additional information on karyotype evolution process within this group, we performed comparative chromosome painting between S. tyrannus and Gallus gallus (GGA). Our results revealed that at least 29 fission-fusion events occurred in the STY karyotype, based on homology with GGA. Fissions occurred mainly in syntenic groups homologous to GGA1-GGA5. On the other hand, the majority of the microchromosomes were found fused to other chromosomal elements in STY, indicating these rearrangements played an important role in the reduction of the 2n to 68. Comparison with hybridization pattern of the Japanese-Mountain-Eagle (Nisaetus nipalensis orientalis), the only Aquilinae analyzed by comparative chromosome painting previously, did not reveal any synapomorphy that could represent a chromosome signature to this subfamily. Therefore, conclusions about karyotype evolution in Aquilinae require additional painting studies.


2021 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 319-321
Author(s):  
Petra Musilova ◽  
Svatava Kubickova ◽  
Halina Cernohorska ◽  
Jiri Rubes

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 2415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Willam Oliveira da Silva ◽  
Stella Miranda Malcher ◽  
Adenilson Leão Pereira ◽  
Julio Cesar Pieczarka ◽  
Malcolm Andrew Ferguson-Smith ◽  
...  

Comparative chromosome-painting analysis among highly rearranged karyotypes of Sigmodontinae rodents (Rodentia, Cricetidae) detects conserved syntenic blocks, which are proposed as chromosomal signatures and can be used as phylogenetic markers. In the Akodontini tribe, the molecular topology (Cytb and/or IRBP) shows five low-supported clades (divisions: “Akodon”, “Bibimys”, “Blarinomys”, “Oxymycterus”, and “Scapteromys”) within two high-supported major clades (clade A: “Akodon”, “Bibimys”, and “Oxymycterus”; clade B: “Blarinomys” and “Scapteromys”). Here, we examine the chromosomal signatures of the Akodontini tribe by using Hylaeamys megacephalus (HME) probes to study the karyotypes of Oxymycterus amazonicus (2n = 54, FN = 64) and Blarinomys breviceps (2n = 28, FN = 50), and compare these data with those from other taxa investigated using the same set of probes. We strategically employ the chromosomal signatures to elucidate phylogenetic relationships among the Akodontini. When we follow the evolution of chromosomal signature states, we find that the cytogenetic data corroborate the current molecular relationships in clade A nodes. We discuss the distinct events that caused karyotypic variability in the Oxymycterus and Blarinomys genera. In addition, we propose that Blarinomys may constitute a species complex, and that the taxonomy should be revised to better delimit the geographical boundaries and their taxonomic status.


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiago Marafiga Degrandi ◽  
Ivanete de Oliveira Furo ◽  
Edivaldo Herculano Correia de Oliveira ◽  
Alice Lemos Costa ◽  
Malcolm A. Ferguson-Smith ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Willam Oliveira da Silva ◽  
Julio Cesar Pieczarka ◽  
Marlyson Jeremias Rodrigues da Costa ◽  
Malcolm Andrew Ferguson-Smith ◽  
Patricia Caroline Mary O’Brien ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The Neacomys genus is predominantly found in the Amazon region, and belongs to the most diverse tribe of the Sigmodontinae subfamily (Rodentia, Cricetidae, Oryzomyini). The systematics of this genus and questions about its diversity and range have been investigated by morphological, molecular (Cytb and COI sequences) and karyotype analysis (classic cytogenetics and chromosome painting), which have revealed candidate species and new distribution areas. Here we analyzed four species of Neacomys by chromosome painting with Hylaeamys megacephalus (HME) whole-chromosome probes, and compared the results with two previously studied Neacomys species and with other taxa from Oryzomyini and Akodontini tribes that have been hybridized with HME probes. Maximum Parsimony (MP) analyses were performed with the PAUP and T.N.T. software packages, using a non-additive (unordered) multi-state character matrix, based on chromosomal morphology, number and syntenic blocks. We also compared the chromosomal phylogeny obtained in this study with molecular topologies (Cytb and COI) that included eastern Amazonian species of Neacomys, to define the phylogenetic relationships of these taxa. Results The comparative chromosome painting analysis of the seven karyotypes of the six species of Neacomys shows that their diversity is due to 17 fusion/fission events and one translocation, pericentric inversions in four syntenic blocks, and constitutive heterochromatin (CH) amplification/deletion of six syntenic autosomal blocks plus the X chromosome. The chromosomal phylogeny is consistent with the molecular relationships of species of Neacomys. We describe new karyotypes and expand the distribution area for species from eastern Amazonia and detect complex rearrangements by chromosome painting among the karyotypes. Conclusions Our phylogeny reflects the molecular relationships of the Akodontini and Oryzomyini taxa and supports the monophyly of Neacomys. This work presents new insights about the chromosomal evolution of this group, and we conclude that the karyotypic divergence is in accord with phylogenetic relationships.


2019 ◽  
Vol 159 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-38
Author(s):  
Igor C.A. Seligmann ◽  
Ivanete O. Furo ◽  
Michelly S. dos Santos ◽  
Marcella M. Tagliarini ◽  
Cristiane C.D. Araujo ◽  
...  

Despite the variation observed in the diploid chromosome number of storks (Ciconiiformes, Ciconiidae), from 2n = 52 to 2n = 78, most reports have relied solely on analyses by conventional staining. As most species have similar macrochromosomes, some authors propose that karyotype evolution involves mainly fusions between microchromosomes, which are highly variable in species with different diploid numbers. In order to verify this hypothesis, in this study, the karyotypes of 2 species of storks from South America with different diploid numbers, the jabiru (Jabiru mycteria, 2n = 56) and the maguary stork (Ciconia maguary, 2n = 72), were analyzed by chromosome painting using whole chromosome probes from the macrochromosomes of Gallus gallus (GGA) and Leucopternis albicollis (LAL). The results revealed that J. mycteria and C. maguary share synteny within chromosome pairs 1-9 and Z. The syntenies to the macrochromosomes of G. gallus are conserved, except for GGA4, which is homologous to 2 different pairs, as in most species of birds. A fusion of GGA8 and GGA9 was observed in both species. Additionally, chromosomes corresponding to GGA4p and GGA6 are fused to other segments that did not hybridize to any of the macrochromosome probes used, suggesting that these segments correspond to microchromosomes. Hence, our data corroborate the proposed hypothesis that karyotype evolution is based on fusions involving microchromosomes. In view of the morphological constancy of the macrochromosome pairs in most Ciconiidae, we propose a putative ancestral karyotype for the family, including the GGA8/GGA9 fusion, and a diploid number of 2n = 78. The use of probes for microchromosome pairs should be the next step in identifying other synapomorphies that may help to clarify the phylogeny of this family.


2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 799-805
Author(s):  
Sandra Eloisa Bülau ◽  
Rafael Kretschmer ◽  
Ricardo José Gunski ◽  
Analía del Valle Garnero ◽  
Patricia C. M. O’Brien ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 211-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Kretschmer ◽  
Ivanete de Oliveira Furo ◽  
Ricardo José Gunski ◽  
Analía del Valle Garnero ◽  
Jorge C. Pereira ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Kretschmer ◽  
Vanusa Lilian Camargo de Lima ◽  
Marcelo Santos de Souza ◽  
Alice Lemos Costa ◽  
Patricia C. M. O’Brien ◽  
...  

In this work we performed comparative chromosome painting using probes from Gallusgallus (GGA) Linnaeus, 1758 and Leucopternisalbicollis (LAL) Latham, 1790 in Synallaxisfrontalis Pelzeln, 1859 (Passeriformes, Furnariidae), an exclusively Neotropical species, in order to analyze whether the complex pattern of intrachromosomal rearrangements (paracentric and pericentric inversions) proposed for Oscines and Suboscines is shared with more basal species. S.frontalis has 82 chromosomes, similar to most Avian species, with a large number of microchromosomes and a few pairs of macrochromosomes. We found polymorphisms in pairs 1 and 3, where homologues were submetacentric and acrocentric. Hybridization of GGA probes showed syntenies in the majority of ancestral macrochromosomes, except for GGA1 and GGA2, which hybridized to more than one pair of chromosomes each. LAL probes confirmed the occurrence of intrachromosomal rearrangements in the chromosomes corresponding to GGA1q, as previously proposed for species from the order Passeriformes. In addition, LAL probes suggest that pericentric inversions or centromere repositioning were responsible for variations in the morphology of the heteromorphic pairs 1 and 3. Altogether, the analysis of our data on chromosome painting and the data published in other Passeriformes highlights chromosomal changes that have occurred during the evolution of Passeriformes.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. e0147647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Violetta R. Beklemisheva ◽  
Polina L. Perelman ◽  
Natalya A. Lemskaya ◽  
Anastasia I. Kulemzina ◽  
Anastasia A. Proskuryakova ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document