The Interchromosomal Effect: Different Meanings for Different Organisms

The term interchromosomal effect was originally used to describe a change in the distribution of exchange in the presence of an inversion. First characterized in the 1920s by early Drosophila researchers, it has been observed in multiple organisms. Nearly half a century later, the term began to appear in the human genetics literature to describe the hypothesis that parental chromosome differences, such as translocations or inversions, may increase the frequency of meiotic chromosome nondisjunction. Although it remains unclear if chromosome aberrations truly affect the segregation of structurally normal chromosomes in humans, the use of the term interchromosomal effect in this context persists. This article explores the history of the use of the term interchromosomal effect and discusses how chromosomes with structural aberrations are segregated during meiosis.

Mendelian Disease caused by variants affecting recognition of Z-DNA and Z-RNA by the Zα domain of the double-stranded RNA Editing Enzyme ADAR

Variants in the human double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) editing enzyme ADAR produce three well-characterized rare Mendelian Diseases: Dyschromatosis Symmetrica Hereditaria (DSH)(OMIM: 127400), Aicardi-Goutières syndrome (AGS)(OMIM: 615010) and Bilateral Striatal Necrosis/Dystonia (BSD). ADAR encodes p150 and p110 protein isoforms. p150 incorporates the Zα domain that binds left-handed Z-DNA and Z-RNA with high affinity through contact of highly conserved residues with the DNA and RNA double-helix. In certain individuals, frameshift variants on one parental chromosome in the second exon of ADAR produce haploinsufficiency of p150 while maintaining normal expression of p110. In other individuals, loss of p150 expression from one chromosome allows mapping of Zα p150 variants from the other parental chromosome directly to phenotype. The analysis reveals that loss of function Zα variants cause dysregulation of innate interferon responses to dsRNA. This approach confirms a biological role for the left-handed conformation in human disease, further validating the power of Mendelian genetics to provide unambiguous answers. The findings reveal that the human genome encodes genetic information using both shape and sequence.

Chromosome hydroxymethylation patterns in human zygotes and cleavage-stage embryos

We report the sequential changes in 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) patterns in the genome of human preimplantation embryos during DNA methylation reprogramming. We have studied chromosome hydroxymethylation and methylation patterns in triploid zygotes and blastomeres of cleavage-stage embryos. Using indirect immunofluorescence, we have analyzed the localization of 5hmC and its co-distribution with 5-methylcytosine (5mC) on the QFH-banded metaphase chromosomes. In zygotes, 5hmC accumulates in both parental chromosome sets, but hydroxymethylation is more intensive in the poorly methylated paternal set. In the maternal set, chromosomes are highly methylated, but contain little 5hmC. Hydroxymethylation is highly region specific in both parental chromosome sets: hydroxymethylated loci correspond to R-bands, but not G-bands, and have well-defined borders, which coincide with the R/G-band boundaries. The centromeric regions and heterochromatin at 1q12, 9q12, 16q11.2, and Yq12 contain little 5mC and no 5hmC. We hypothesize that 5hmC may mark structural/functional genome ‘units’ corresponding to chromosome bands in the newly formed zygotic genome. In addition, we suggest that the hydroxymethylation of R-bands in zygotes can be treated as a new characteristic distinguishing them from G-bands. At cleavages, chromosomes with asymmetrical hydroxymethylation of sister chromatids appear. They decrease in number during cleavages, whereas totally non-hydroxymethylated chromosomes become numerous. Taken together, our findings suggest that, in the zygotic genome, 5hmC is distributed selectively and its pattern is determined by both parental origin of chromosomes and type of chromosome bands – R, G, or C. At cleavages, chromosome hydroxymethylation pattern is dynamically changed due to passive and non-selective overall loss of 5hmC, which coincides with that of 5mC.

Formamide-Free Genomic in situ Hybridization Allows Unambiguous Discrimination of Highly Similar Parental Genomes in Diploid Hybrids and Allopolyploids

Polyploidy and hybridization play an important role in plant diversification and speciation. The application of genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) allows the identification of parental genomes in hybrids, thus elucidating their origins and allowing for analysis of their genomic evolution. The performance of GISH depends on the similarity of the parental genomes and on the age of hybrids. Here, we present the formamide-free GISH (ff-GISH) protocol applied to diploid and polyploid hybrids of monocots (Prospero, Hyacinthaceae) and dicots (Melampodium, Asteraceae) differing in similarity of the parental genomes and in chromosome and genome sizes. The efficiency of the new protocol is compared to the standard GISH protocol. As a result, ff-GISH allowed efficient labeling and discrimination of the parental chromosome sets in diploid and allopolyploid hybrids in Prospero autumnale species complex. In contrast, the standard GISH protocol failed to differentiate the parental genomes due to high levels of similar repetitive DNA. Likewise, an unambiguous identification of parental genomes in allotetraploid Melampodium nayaritense (Asteraceae) was possible after ff-GISH, whereas the standard GISH hybridization performance was suboptimal. The modified method is simple and non-toxic and allows the discrimination of very similar parental genomes in hybrids. This method lends itself to modifications and improvements and can also be used for FISH.

AreABLandBCRImprinted?

An increasing number of clinical observations and genetic experiments have shown that some parts of the genome behave differently depending on whether they are of paternal or maternal origin. This phenomenon is known as “genomic imprinting” and has been defined as “a reversible process whereby a gamete-specific modification in the parental generation can sometimes lead to functional differences between maternal and paternal genomes in diploid cells of the offspring” [1]. The accumulating evidence for its important role in cancer predisposition syndromes as well as for the pathogenesis of certain types of sporadic tumors prompted us to investigate whether imprinting may also be instrumental in selecting particular parental chromosome regions involved in balanced rearrangements, such as the leukemia-specific translocation t(9;22) [2]. Several reports have analyzed the expression, the methylation and the replication patterns of the two genes, ABL and BCR, on chromosomes 9 and 22, respectively, which are affected by this translocation [3-6]. Although not directly comparable, the results of these studies seem to invalidate our cytogenetic observations. We therefore review this controversial issue and provide some possible explanations for the contradictory results.