Recommendations Regarding Hyperglycaemia, Blood Pressure and Lipid Management in Diabetes Mellitus – Presentation of Key Aspects from the 2019 ESC/EASD Guidelines on Diabetes, Pre-Diabetes and Cardiovascular Diseases

The purpose of our review is to bring to the clinical specialities physicians’ attention the recommendations regarding diabetes mellitus (DM) management presented in the 2019 ESC/EASD Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. Key aspects from the guideline regarding blood pressure, lipid and glucose modern management are presented with focus of reducing cardiovascular risk in diabetes mellitus patients. The clinician must not forget that every DM patient is a candidate for a future cardiovascular event and that multifactorial and patient-adapted therapy is the key approach in reducing this risk.

P3355Stress-induced left ventricular dyssynchrony predicts future cardiac events in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease

Background Prognostic value of stress induced left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony has not been fully understood. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible impact between cardiovascular events and stress induced worsening LV dyssynchrony. Methods and results One hundred and eighty consecutive subjects with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) (142 men, mean age 68±12 years) underwent both gated myocardial single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with 99mTc-sestamibi or tetrofosmin according to a standard same day stress-rest protocol and coronary angiography or coronary computed tomography. The summed difference score (SDS) was calculated in every subjects. LV ejection fraction (EF) and phase Entropy at after stress and rest were determined by cardioREPO software. We determined %ΔEntropy = (stress Entropy - rest Entropy)/rest Entropy x100, as an indicator of stress-induced LV dyssynchrony. In the study population, the mean SDS was 2.7±3.9 and LVEF was 58±16%, stress and rest Entropy were 0.62±0.15 and 0.57±0.13, respectively. %ΔEntropy was higher in patients with CAD than in those without CAD (3.3±11.5 vs. 10.2±15.0, respectively). Moreover, there was a strict correlation between the presence of CAD and %ΔEntropy, indicator of stress induced LV dyssynchrony (non-CAD vs. CAD and/or 1 vessel disease vs. multivessel disease: 4.3±12.5 vs. 8.8±15.6 vs. 12.7±14.3, respectively. p<0.05) We examined all study subjects and they were divided into 2 groups by cut off value of the %ΔEntropy constructed with receiver operating characteristic curve (=15.4). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that future cardiovascular event rate was significantly higher in %ΔEntropy >15.4 group (20/57) than in %ΔEntropy <15.4 group (24/123) (Log-rank p<0.01). On the other hand, summed stress score and SDS were no significant differences between 2 groups. However, SDS was higher in patients with future cardiovascular event than in those without cardiovascular event (4.4±5.4 vs. 2.2±3.2, respectively. p=0.001). Conclusion In patients with known or suspected CAD, stress-induced worsening LV dyssynchrony may predict the presence of CAD and future cardiac events. Acknowledgement/Funding None