A Rare Case of Pneumomediastinum after Eustachian Tube Dilation

Eustachian tube dilation (ETD) is a relatively new intervention for the treatment of eustachian tube dysfunction. Though it previously had no assigned billing code, the American Medical Association recently accepted a new Category I Current Procedural Terminology code application for ETD to be effective in January 2021. Reported complications are uncommon and usually minor. Herein, we present a rare case of massive pneumomediastinum following this procedure. Such major complications are critical to report as ETD becomes a more commonly practiced procedure.

Assessing Performance, Productivity, and Staffing Needs in Pathology Groups: Observations From the College of American Pathologists PathFocus Pathology Practice Activity and Staffing Program

Context.—The PathFocus program affords the opportunity for participating pathology practices to be compared with other practices that have similar characteristics. Objectives.—To demonstrate variability in workload among different pathology practice settings and to determine practice characteristics that influence staffing levels. Design.—Among 228 group practices in the PathFocus database, group practice settings were analyzed. The practice characteristics that were highly correlated with staffing levels are presented. Results.—Activities that showed significant variation include surgical pathology (P = .003), cytopathology (P = .006), miscellaneous (P = .006), and professional development (P = .003). Group practices report up to 4% of hours devoted to clinical pathology consultation, on average, and from 20% to 25% to administration and management. There are strong positive associations with staffing levels for lower-complexity Current Procedural Terminology code volumes (P < .001) and higher-complexity Current Procedural Terminology code volumes (P = .006). Conclusion.—The settings of pathology practices carry specific commitments of time that are different and not equally distributed among all practice settings and strongly influence staffing requirements.

Quantifying Net Staffing Costs Due to Longer-than-average Surgical Case Durations

Background Anesthesiology departments incur staffing costs that are not covered by revenue because the operating room (OR) time allocation and case scheduling are not done to maximize OR efficiency and because surgical durations are longer than average. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate a method to quantify net anesthesia staffing costs due to longer-than-average surgical durations and evaluate the factors that influence staffing costs. Methods Data collected from two anesthesiology departments in academic hospitals for 1 yr included date of surgery, time that patients entered the OR, time that patients exited the OR, surgical service, and the Current Procedural Terminology code for the primary surgical procedure. Anesthesia care performed outside the main surgical suite and services not billed with American Society of Anesthesiologists units were excluded. National average surgical durations were determined from the Current Procedural Terminology code from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' database. Actual surgical durations were then used to determine staffing solutions to maximize OR efficiency; national average surgical durations were then used to determine a second solution. The difference in staffing costs between these two staffing solutions represented the staffing costs attributable to longer surgical durations. Costs were converted to dollar amounts using compensation values reported in a national compensation survey. The differences in revenue were determined by applying conversion factors to the differences in surgical durations. The annual net cost attributable to longer surgical durations equaled the staffing costs minus the revenue produced by longer durations. Net staffing costs were estimated for two hospitals using median staffing compensation and median payer mix. Net staffing costs were then recalculated by varying the parameters (conversion factors, limits on differences between actual and average surgical duration, levels of compensation, surgical service size of OR allocation). Results Using the median compensation of staff and an average conversion factor, the net annual staffing costs attributable to longer surgical durations were $672,100 for the first hospital. However, if staff members were highly compensated and the payer mix was unfavorable, the net staffing costs were $1,688,000. Reducing the difference between actual and average duration resulted in lower staffing costs. Net staffing costs were less in a second hospital studied that had many low-volume surgical services. Conclusions Longer-than-average surgical durations can increase net staffing costs for anesthesiology groups. The increase is dependent on factors such as staffing compensation and payer mix.