measurement error correction
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

61
(FIVE YEARS 6)

H-INDEX

12
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 01-16
Author(s):  
Hiroko Solvang

A discrete measurement error model for radial distance and angle to detected objects in line transect surveys is considered. This approach directly quantifies the effect of measurement error on the estimated effective strip half-width. We apply the method to experimental data collected over the period 2008-2013 in North Atlantic both under the assumption of multiplicative and additive measurement errors. Our results indicate that the abundance estimates considering the measurement error are consistently larger than the abundance estimates without any measurement error correction.


2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-99
Author(s):  
Dapeng Wen ◽  
Xiyin Liang ◽  
Maogen Su ◽  
Meng Wu ◽  
Ruilin Chen ◽  
...  

Aiming at the problems that the weak current signal circuit is susceptible to noise interference and leakage current at the input terminal affects the measurement accuracy, a weak current measurement error correction scheme based on the combination of wavelet threshold denoising and generalized regression neural network (GRNN) was proposed. The scheme was applied to the error correction of multi-channel weak current measurement system based on the ADAS1134 chip: the wavelet threshold denoising was used to preprocess the original current data measured by the system and the current measurement value was corrected after the system measurement error correction model established with GRNN was constructed. Compared with the correction method based on least square method and back propagation neural network (BPNN), this method has many advantages such as high accuracy, anti-interference ability and strong generalization ability. The experimental results showed that RMSE=0.0911 nA, MAE=0.0354 nA, and MAPE=0.0078%, without increasing the complexity of the measurement circuit, which achieved the purpose of correcting the measurement error of the weak current measurement system.


IEEE Access ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 39733-39745
Author(s):  
Shumpei Shimokawa ◽  
Yuzo Taenaka ◽  
Kazuya Tsukamoto ◽  
Myung Lee

Biometrika ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junhan Fang ◽  
Grace Y Yi

Summary Measurement error in covariates has been extensively studied in many conventional regression settings where covariate information is typically expressed in a vector form. However, there has been little work on error-prone matrix-variate data, which commonly arise from studies with imaging, spatial-temporal structures, etc. We consider analysis of error-contaminated matrix-variate data. We particularly focus on matrix-variate logistic measurement error models. We examine the biases induced from naive analysis which ignores measurement error in matrix-variate data. Two measurement error correction methods are developed to adjust for measurement error effects. The proposed methods are justified both theoretically and empirically. We analyse an electroencephalography dataset with the proposed methods.


Author(s):  
Anusha Musunuru ◽  
Richard J. Porter

Road safety modelers frequently use average annual daily traffic (AADT) as a measure of exposure in regression models of expected crash frequency for road segments and intersections. Recorded AADT values at most locations are estimated by state and local transportation agencies with significant uncertainty, often by extrapolating short-term traffic counts over time and space. This uncertainty in the traffic volume estimates, often termed in a modeling context as measurement error in right-hand-side variables, can have serious effects on model estimation, including: 1) biased regression coefficient estimates; and 2) increases in dispersion. The structure and magnitude of measurement error in AADT estimates are not clearly understood by researchers or practitioners, leading to difficulties in explicitly accounting for this error in statistical road safety models, and ultimately in finding solutions for its correction. This study explores the impacts of measurement error in traffic volume estimates on statistical road safety models by employing measurement error correction approaches, including regression calibration and simulation extrapolation. The concept is demonstrated using crash, traffic, and roadway data from rural, two-lane horizontal curves in the State of Washington. The overall results show that the regression coefficient estimates with a positive coefficient were larger and those with a negative coefficient were smaller (i.e., more negative) when the measurement error correction methods were applied to the regression models of expected crash frequency. Future directions in applications of measurement error correction approaches to road safety research are provided.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document