Long-Term Outcomes of High-Dose Single-Fraction Radiosurgery for Chordomas of the Spine and Sacrum

INTRODUCTION To evaluate outcomes of patients with primary chordomas treated with spine stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone or in combination with surgery, drawing from a single-institution database to elucidate treatment options associated with durable radiographic control of these conventionally radioresistant tumors. Chordomas result in significant morbidity, with a high rate of local recurrence and potential for metastases. SRS as a primary treatment could save patients from extensive surgery. Spine SRS outcomes support exploration of its role in the durable control of these conventionally radioresistant tumors. METHODS Clinical records were reviewed for outcomes of patients with primary chordoma of the mobile spine and sacrum who underwent single-fraction SRS between 2006 and 2017. Radiographic local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), overall survival (OS), symptom response, and toxicity were assessed in relation to extent of surgery. RESULTS In total, 35 patients with de novo chordoma of the mobile spine (49%) and sacrum (51%) received SRS with a median post-SRS follow-up of 38.8 mo (range: 2.0-122.9). The median PTV dose was 24Gy (range: 18–24Gy). Overall, 12 patients (33%) underwent definitive SRS and 23 patients (66%) underwent surgery followed by adjuvant SRS. Surgical strategies included separation surgery prior to SRS, curettage/intralesional resection, and en bloc resection in 7, 6, and 10 patients, respectively. The 3- and 5-yr LRFS rates were 86.2% and 80.5% respectively. Among 32 patients receiving 24 Gy (91%), the 3- and 5-yr LRFS were 96.3% and 89.9%. The 3- and 5-yr OS rates were 90.0% and 84.3%. The symptom response rate to treatment was 88% for pain and radiculopathy. Extent or type of surgery was not associated with LRFS, OS, or symptom response rates (P > .05), but en bloc resection was associated with higher CTCAE v. 5.0 surgical toxicity compared to epidural decompression and curettage/intralesional resection (P = .03). The long-term = grade 2 SRS toxicity rate was 31%, including 17% grade 3 tissue necrosis, recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy, fracture, and secondary malignancy. CONCLUSION High-dose spine SRS offers the chance of durable radiographic control and effective symptom relief with acceptable toxicity for primary chordomas as either definitive or adjuvant therapy.

Perilesional Resection of Glioblastoma Is Independently Associated With Improved Outcomes

BACKGROUND Resection is a critical component in the initial treatment of glioblastoma (GBM). Often GBMs are resected using an intralesional method. Circumferential perilesional resection of GBMs has been described, but with limited data. OBJECTIVE To conduct an observational retrospective analysis to test whether perilesional resection produced a greater extent of resection. METHODS We identified all patients with newly diagnosed GBM who underwent resection at our institution from June 1, 1993 to December 31, 2015. Demographics, presenting symptoms, intraoperative data, method of resection (perilesional or intralesional), volumetric imaging data, and postoperative outcomes were obtained. Complete resection (CR) was defined as 100% resection of all contrast-enhancing disease. Univariate analyses employed analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Fisher's exact test. Multivariate analyses used propensity score-weighted multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS Newly diagnosed GBMs were resected in 1204 patients, 436 tumors (36%) perilesionally and 766 (64%) intralesionally. Radiographic CR was achieved in 69% of cases. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that perilesional tumor resection was associated with a significantly higher rate of CR than intralesional resection (81% vs 62%, multivariate odds ratio = 2.5, 95% confidence interval: 1.8-3.4, P < .001). Among tumors in eloquent cortex, multivariate analysis showed that patients who underwent perilesional resection had a higher rate of CR (79% vs 58%, respectively, P < .001) and a lower rate of neurological complications (11% vs 20%, respectively, P = .018) than those who underwent intralesional resection. CONCLUSION Circumferential perilesional resection of GBM is associated with significantly higher rates of CR and lower rates of neurological complications than intralesional resection, even for tumors arising in eloquent locations. Perilesional resection, when feasible, should be considered as a preferred option.

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of En Bloc Vertebrectomy Compared with Intralesional Resection for Giant Cell Tumors of the Mobile Spine

Study Design Systematic review and meta-analysis. Objective To compare the recurrence and perioperative complication rate of en bloc vertebrectomy (EV) and intralesional resection (IR) in the giant cell tumor of the mobile spine (SGCT). Methods We systematically searched publications in the PubMed and Embase databases for reports of SGCTs, excluding the sacrum. Two reviewers independently assessed all publications. A meta-analysis was performed using local recurrence and postoperative complications as the primary outcomes of interest. Results There were four articles reporting recurrence and two articles reporting postoperative complications. All included articles were case series. In all, 91 patients were included; 49 were treated with IR and 42 were treated with EV. Local recurrence rates were 36.7 and 9.5% in the IR and EV groups, respectively. Rates of postoperative complications were 36.4% with IR and 11.1% with EV. Overall, patients treated with EV not only had a lower recurrence rate (relative risk [RR] 0.22; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.09 to 0.52) but also had a lower postoperative complication rate (RR 0.34; 95% CI 0.07 to 1.52) compared with IR. Conclusions Based on the limited data obtained from systematic review, SGCT patients treated with EV had a lower recurrence rate and fewer postoperative complications than those treated with IR.