carbonate mound
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

74
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

18
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2020 ◽  
Vol 178 (1) ◽  
pp. jgs2020-102
Author(s):  
Josué J. Jautzy ◽  
Martine M. Savard ◽  
Denis Lavoie ◽  
Omid H. Ardakani ◽  
Ryan S. Dhillon ◽  
...  

The Hudson Bay sedimentary basin was overlooked geologically until two decades ago. Recent efforts to understand the palaeogeothermal history of this basin have led to the evaluation of fluid inclusion microthermometry, apatite fission track, organic matter reflectance and Rock–Eval analyses. Although apatite fission track and organic maturity indicators tend to show relatively low maximum burial temperatures (60–80°C), evidence of potential oil slicks on the sea surface and oil and gas shows in offshore wells have been reported across Hudson Bay. Fluid inclusion microthermometry in a carbonate mound sequence suggests homogenization temperatures of 118 ± 25 and 93 ± 10°C for recrystallized synsedimentary marine calcite and late pore-filling burial calcite, respectively. This sequence provides an interesting geological framework to test the application of clumped isotope thermometry against independent geothermometers. Here, we present clumped isotope data acquired on the late calcite cements and diagenetically altered early marine phases. The integration of clumped isotopic data with other thermal indicators allows the reconstruction and refinement of the thermal–diagenetic history of these carbonates by confirming an episode of heating, probably of hydrothermal origin and prior to normal burial diagenesis, that reset both fluid inclusions and the clumped isotope indicators without recrystallization.


2020 ◽  
Vol 94 (3) ◽  
pp. 436-456
Author(s):  
David C. Kopaska-Merkel ◽  
Douglas W. Haywick ◽  
Richard G. Keyes

AbstractA small (1.2 m) columnar carbonate mound in shaley strata equivalent to the Hartselle Sandstone (lower Serpukhovian) near Woodville, northeastern Alabama, was built by a consortium of species unlike those of other Carboniferous mounds in the southeastern United States. The mound contains a new problematic microencruster, Aphralysia anfracta new species, along with encrusting bryozoans (Fistulipora M'Coy, 1849), nonskeletal microbes, and other microencrusters, including Aphralysia capriorae Mamet and Roux, 1975, in a carbonate mud matrix. Mound cavities are filled with three generations of carbonate and siliciclastic sediment. Other biotic constituents of the mound include oncoids, sponges (including Pileospongia Rigby, Keyes, and Horowitz, 1979), gastropods, crinoids, a tabulate coral, and coenobionts, including coccoid calcimicrobes. The mound biota, especially the microencrusters, is dramatically different from those of other Serpukhovian mounds that have been described from Alabama (made by various consortia of rugose corals, fenestrate bryozoans, crinoids, sponges, and nonskeletal microbes). Indeed, the Woodville mound extends the range of the lower Carboniferous encruster Aphralysia Garwood, 1914 to North America.UUID: http://zoobank.org/d3988875-a7fb-4382-bd14-b17c083d87ad


2019 ◽  
Vol 162 ◽  
pp. 22-34
Author(s):  
Tegan Levendal ◽  
Daniel Sopher ◽  
Christopher Juhlin ◽  
Oliver Lehnert
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas W. Haywick ◽  
◽  
David C. Kopaska-Merkel ◽  
Richard Keyes
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document