Comprehensive Rehabilitation Outcome Measurement Scale (CROMS); Development and Preliminary Validation of An Interdisciplinary Measure for Rehabilitation Outcomes

Introduction: Comprehensive and interdisciplinary measurement of rehabilitation outcome is an essential part in the assessment and prognosis of a patient. This requires input from various disciplines working with the patient and the rehabilitation team. Moreover, the evaluation measures should consider the cultural compatibility, cost, and comprehensiveness of the contextual factors of the region and as of the country.Methods: The new tool was developed through consensus and followed Delphi process incorporating various rehabilitation professionals. The validity, reliability of the tool was tested on 30 patients and their rehabilitation professionals. The tool was also validated in two native languages and back translated considering the semantics. The construct validity was analyzed using interclass correlation co-efficient (ICC), internal consistency was analyzed using Cronbach’s alpha. Results: The final Comprehensive Rehabilitation Outcome Measurement Scale (CROMS) carries 30 items which can be completed by the person with disability and the professional team. The final tool holds an overall ICC of 0.93 with a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.92 for both patient and therapist reported measures. Conclusion: The 30 item CROMS is a reliable and valid tool that can potentially be used to evaluate functional independence of various patient populations.

A delphi procedure on rehabilitation outcome for patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury; first phase of the Neurotraumatology Quality Registry (NET-QURE)

Objective: To select a set of rehabilitation outcome instruments for a national Neurotrauma Quality Registry (Net-QuRe) among professionals involved in the care of patients with traumatic brain injury. Design: A 3-round online Delphi procedure. Subjects: Eighty professionals from multiple disciplines working in 1 of the 8 participating rehabilitation centres were invited to participate. The response rate varied from 70% to 76% per round. Methods: For the Delphi procedure, multiple outcome categories were defined based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) with concomitant measurement instruments. For each category we strived for consensus on one instrument of at least 75%. Results: After the first round, consensus was reached for the category subjective cognitive functioning. After the second round for quality of life, pain, general functioning, anxiety and depression, general psychological functioning, communication (impairment), and personal factors. Finally, after the third round, consensus was reached for activities of daily living, participation, self-awareness, and aphasia. No consensus was reached for the categories motor function, cognitive function, comorbidity, fatigue, and employment status. Conclusion: Consensus was reached in 12 out of 17 outcome categories. A Delphi procedure seems to be a feasible method to collectively select measurement instruments for a multicentre study.

Outcome Measures in Cancer Rehabilitation: Pain, Function, and Symptom Assessment

Assessment of cancer rehabilitation outcome measures is integral for patient assessment, symptom screening, and advancing scientific research. In the broad field of cancer rehabilitation, outcome measures can cross-cut across many different branches of oncologic care including clinician-reported, patient-reported, and objective measures. Specific outcome measures that apply to cancer rehabilitation include those pertinent to pain, function, quality of life, fatigue, and cognition. These outcome measures, when used in cancer rehabilitation, can be utilized to evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention and to triage to the appropriate supportive care service. This review article summarizes some of the commonly used outcome measures that can be applied in the cancer rehabilitation setting to support scholarly work and patient care.

Influence of Cognitive Impairment on Rehabilitation Received and Its Mediating Effect on Functional Recovery

Background: Cognitive impairment (CI) has been reported to negatively impact rehabilitation outcomes. Knowledge about differences in rehabilitation received in dependence of CI as a potential mediating factor is limited. Objective: To analyze whether CI affects amount and frequency of rehabilitation received and if associations between CI and rehabilitation outcome are mediated by the provided amount of therapy. Methods: Observational cohort study in ward-based geriatric rehabilitation consecutively including 373 patients (mean age 82.0±6.69 years, mean MMSE 23.66±5.31). Outcome measures were amount, frequency, and type of multi-professional therapy sessions and rehabilitation outcome assessed with the Barthel Index (BI). Cognitive status was measured with the Mini-Mental-State Examination (MMSE) classifying three patient subgroups according to cognitive status were considered. Results: Patients with more severe CI received least total therapy hours (TTH) (MMSE < 17, 13.67±6.58 versus MMSE 17–26, 16.12±7.19 and MMSE > 26, 17.79±8.88 h, p = 0.014) and were less often included in occupational therapy (MMSE < 17, 48.9%versus MMSE 17–26, 65.5%and MMSE > 26, 71.4%, p = 0.019) and group-based physiotherapy (MMSE < 17, 73.3%versus MMSE 17–26, 88.5%and MMSE > 26, 81.2%, p = 0.027). Regression models showed that CI negatively impacted TTH (β= 0.24, p = 0.003) and rehabilitation outcome (β= 0.41, p = 0.008). In the mediation model, TTH accounted for 23.18%(p < 0.001) of the relationship between CI and rehabilitation outcome. Conclusion: Cognitive impairment negatively impacted rehabilitation received. The lower TTH partly mediated the negative association between CI and rehabilitation outcome. Future research should identify specific barriers to therapy provision and optimal length, intensity, and dosage of rehabilitation programs to optimize rehabilitation outcomes in CI.