Abstract 1122‐000146: A Survey of Current Status and Roles of Interventional Neurologists in Japan

Introduction : In Japan, there are more board‐certified neurosurgeons than board‐certified neurologists, and a significant part of stroke practice is provided by neurosurgeons. In neuroendovascular therapy practice, the trend of neurosurgeons to be in majority is more pronounced. The most of neuroendovascular therapy specialists (n = 1,586) certified by the Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy (JSNET) consists of neurosurgeons, and the proportion of neurologists/internists is only 8% (n = 128) as of April 2021. The aim of this study is to investigate the current status and roles of interventional neurologists, the minority providing neuroendovascular therapy, in Japanese clinical setting. Methods : Between 16th and 28th February 2021, the Japan Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology (JSVIN) conducted a survey for society‐member neurologists and internists using questionnaires on Google Forms. The questionnaires consisted of 11 items regarding years after graduation, facility location, department, work style (full‐time or concurrent interventionalist), diseases for which respondents were engaged, disease/procedure preferences which respondents would treat by themselves, respondents’ roles in their own neuroendovascular therapy team, and others. Results : Replies were obtained from 112 (67.1%) out of all JSVIN‐member neurologists and internists (n = 167). The respondents included 71 JSNET‐certified specialists and they consisted of 56.3% of all the JSNET‐certified neurologists/internists. The departments to where the respondents belonged were Neurology in 66%, Cerebrovascular medicine in 25%, Neuroendovascular therapy in 4%, and Neurosurgery in 3%. The median years after graduation was 15 years (interquartile range, 10 – 21 years) and the proportion of respondents who have graduated 10 years or less was 30%. Respondents’ facilities were distributed around 27 prefectures of all 47 Japanese prefectures and a significant proportion of those was located in urban area; 20% in Osaka and 13% in Tokyo. The number of full‐time interventionalist was only 1. Sixty‐three (56%) were concurrently engaged in general neurology practice, and 33 (30%) in stroke neurology practice. The proportions of diseases for which the respondents were engaged were ischemic cerebrovascular diseases (acute large vessel occlusion strokes, carotid stenoses, and others) in 100%, hemorrhagic cerebrovascular diseases (cerebral aneurysms, arteriovenous shunts, and others) in 44%, and other diseases (tumors, spinal vascular disorders, and others) in 28%. The proportions of disease/procedure preferences which respondents would treat by themselves were acute stroke thrombectomy in 90%, carotid/intracranial stenoses in 87%, ruptured cerebral aneurysms in 38%, unruptured cerebral aneurysms in 31%, cerebral arteriovenous shunts in 33%, brain tumors in 29%, spinal vascular disorders in 13%, and pediatric diseases in 3%. Respondents’ roles in their own neuroendovascular therapy team were diagnostic performances based on neurologist’s skills in 89%, comorbidity assessment and management based on internist’s skills in 88%, precise neurological evaluation in 77%, neurosonological evaluation in 75%, and establishments of in‐hospital workflow/multi‐disciplinary collaboration in 71%. Conclusions : Most of interventional neurologists in Japan were engaged in neuroendovascular therapy mainly for ischemic cerebrovascular diseases in parallel with general neurology and/or stroke neurology practices. Interventional neurologists’ skill set developed in neurology/internist trainings and practices might contribute to the quality improvement of neuroendovascular therapy in Japan.

Stroke units in the Philippines: An observational study

Background In high-income countries, the management of stroke has changed substantially over the years with the advent of thrombolysis and endovascular treatment. However, in low-income countries, such interventions may not be available, or patients may come to the hospital outside the time window no longer qualified for this therapy. Most studies on stroke units were conducted in high-income countries. Unfortunately, there has been no local multicenter data with large patient numbers showing the effectiveness of stroke units in the Southeast Asian region. Aim To compare the outcomes of patients allocated to stroke units (based on accepted criteria) to those allocated to general neurology wards in the Philippines. Methods This is an open, prospective, parallel, observational comparative study of patients from 11 institutions in the Philippines. Patients were allocated either to the stroke unit or to the general neurology ward by the admitting physician based on the criteria suggested by the Stroke Trialist Collaboration Group. The primary outcome was to determine in-hospital mortality at three- and six months in both stroke units and general neurology wards. The secondary outcomes were determined by a dichotomized modified Rankin scale: (0–2) independent and (3–5) dependent. Results A total of 1025 patients were included in the study. In the primary outcome, a higher mortality rate (8.4% vs 1.0%) in the general neurology ward (p = 0.000) was seen. The six-month mortality rate was statistically significant and higher among patients admitted to the general neurology ward (3.1% vs 0.8%) (p = 0.009). Patients admitted to the stroke unit attained an independent functional outcome (mRS 0–2) as compared to the general neurology ward (73% vs 61.5%) (p = 0.000). Analysis of functionality at six months favored patients admitted in the stroke unit (88.5% vs 81.4%) as compared to the general neurology ward. Conclusion Patients specifically admitted to stroke units in the Philippines based on established criteria have better outcomes than those admitted to general neurology wards.

Patients’ Experiences of Remote Neurology Consultations during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Telemedicine has been widely implemented during the COVID-19 global pandemic to enable continuity of care of chronic illnesses. We modified our general neurology clinic to be conducted using remote audio-only telephone consultations. We included all patients over a 10-week period who agreed to both a telephone consultation and a questionnaire afterwards in order to ascertain the patient’s perspective of the experience. There were 212 participants consisting of men (43.8%) and women (56.2%). The mean ± standard deviation of age was 47.8 ± 17.0 (range 17–93) years. For the most part, patients found remote consultations either “just as good” (67.1%) or “better” (9.0%) than face-to-face consultations. Those who deemed it to be “not as good” were significantly older (52.3 ± 17.9 years vs. 46.6 ± 16.6 years, <i>p =</i>0.045) or were more likely to have a neurological disorder that required clinical examination, namely, a neuromuscular condition (66.7%, <i>p =</i> 0.002) or an undiagnosed condition (46.7%, <i>p =</i> 0.031). At the height of the COVID-19 global pandemic, most patients were satisfied with remote consultations. The positive feedback for remote consultations needs to be verified outside of this unique scenario because the results were likely influenced by the patients’ apprehension to attend the hospital amongst other factors.

Leveraging Trends in Neurology Admissions for Departmental Planning During the COVID-19 Pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to shifts in healthcare utilization for patients both with and without COVID-19. We aimed to determine how trends in neurology service admissions during the pandemic may aid in departmental planning by predicting future clinician staffing and other needs. We examined all admissions to the general neurology, stroke, and neurocritical care services from January 31 to May 16, 2020 at our tertiary-care hospital using an electronic health record query, comparing these to analogous data in 2019. We trended admission rates and projected future censuses using logarithmic regression, tracked changes in length of stay (LOS), and quantified shifts in presentations of specific diagnoses. Daily rates of admissions declined sharply during the week of March 13, 2020 (the week after pandemic status was declared by the World Health Organization). On the censoring date, we projected a return to pre-pandemic censuses in the week of June 21 and used this information to make decisions regarding neurology resident schedules. There was a trend toward increased LOS for general neurology and stroke patients between March 27 and April 9, 2020 compared to in 2019, with subsequent decline coinciding with early hospital initiatives. Since March 13, 2020, there has been a trend toward reduced presentations of ischemic stroke, suggesting a need for community education on stroke awareness. Characterizing early trends in neurology admissions may allow physician administrators to plan local and community-level responses to the pandemic.

Patient Characteristics Associated With Readmission to 3 Neurology Services at an Urban Academic Center

Background and Purpose: Hospital 30-day readmissions in patients with primary neurological problems are not well characterized. We sought to determine patient characteristics associated with readmission across 3 different inpatient neurology services at New York University Langone Hospital. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all 30-day readmissions from the General Neurology, Epilepsy, and Stroke services at NYULH Brooklyn and Manhattan campuses from 2016-2017 and compared them to a random sample of non-readmitted neurology patients. We used univariate analyses to compare demographics, clinical characteristics, disease specific metrics, and discharge factors of non-readmitted and readmitted groups and binomial logistic regression to examine specific variables with adjustment for confounders. Results: We included 284 patients with 30-day readmissions and 306 control patients without readmissions matched by discharge location and service. After adjusting for confounders, we found that the following factors were associated with increased readmission risk: a recent hospital encounter increased risk for all services, increased number of medications at discharge, intensive care unit stay, higher length of stay, and prior history of seizure for the General Neurology Service, increased number of medications at discharge for the Epilepsy Service, and active malignancy and higher discharge modified Rankin Scale score for the Stroke Service. Conclusion: This study identifies potential risk factors for readmission in patients across multiple neurology services. Further research is needed to establish whether these risk factors hold across multiple institutions.

Autoimmune encephalitis management: MS centers and beyond

Traditionally, multiple sclerosis (MS) specialists have been the go-to providers for managing certain treatable non-demyelinating inflammatory or autoimmune central nervous system (CNS) disorders. The advent of increased incidence (mostly due to improved recognition) prompts the question: who should be managing autoimmune encephalitis? These patients are generally first encountered in the hospital, as well as general neurology and subspecialty clinics, such as epilepsy. Autoimmune neurology is a specialty which gives focus to evaluation and treatment of patients with autoimmune encephalitis, among other disorders, and trains neurologists accordingly. Some of those experts are dual trained in both MS and non-MS inflammatory/autoimmune CNS disorders. Many other autoimmune specialists are trained in non-MS care, such as hospital neurology, movement disorders, and epilepsy. General and other subspecialty providers increasingly find the need to be versed in management of autoimmune encephalitis.

Test Your Memory (TYM) and Test Your Memory for Mild Cognitive Impairment (TYM-MCI): A Review and Update Including Results of Using the TYM Test in a General Neurology Clinic and Using a Telephone Version of the TYM Test

This paper summarises the current status of two novel short cognitive tests (SCT), known as Test Your Memory (TYM) and Test Your Memory for Mild Cognitive Impairment (TYM-MCI). The history of and recent research on the TYM and TYM-MCI are summarised in applications for Alzheimer’s and non-Alzheimer’s dementia and mild cognitive impairment. The TYM test can be used in a general neurology clinic and can help distinguish patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) from those with no neurological cause for their memory complaints. An adapted tele-TYM test administered by telephone to patients produces scores which correlate strongly with the clinic-administered Addenbrookes Cognitive Examination revised (ACE-R) test and can identify patients with dementia. Patients with AD decline on the TYM test at a rate of 3.6–4.1 points/year.