concurrency errors
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

23
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

6
(FIVE YEARS 0)

IEEE Access ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 165373-165386
Author(s):  
Zhenwu Xu ◽  
Jinan Shen ◽  
Peng Luo ◽  
Fang Liang
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
João M. Lourenço ◽  
Jan Fiedor ◽  
Bohuslav Křena ◽  
Tomáš Vojnar
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
pp. 395-423
Author(s):  
Peter A. Buhr
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 944-955 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xi Chang ◽  
Zhuo Zhang ◽  
Peng Zhang ◽  
Jianxin Xue ◽  
Jianjun Zhao

Author(s):  
Hongyi Ma ◽  
Steve R. Diersen ◽  
Liqiang Wang ◽  
Chunhua Liao ◽  
Daniel Quinlan ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 765-767 ◽  
pp. 1576-1580 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qi Chang Chen ◽  
Zhan Fang Chen ◽  
Zhuang Liu ◽  
Xin Feng ◽  
Zhen Gang Jiang ◽  
...  

The reality of multi-core hardware has made concurrent programs pervasive. Unfortunately, writing correct concurrent programs is difficult. Atomicity violation, which is caused by concurrent executions unexpectedly violating the atomicity of a certain code region, is one of the most common concurrency errors. However, atomicity violation bugs are hard to find using traditional testing and debugging techniques. In this paper, we investigate an approach based on machine learning techniques (specifically decision tree and support vector machine (SVM)) for classifying the benign atomicity violations from the harmful ones. A benign atomicity violation is known not to affect the program's correctness even it happens. We formulate our problem as a supervised-learning problem and apply these two machine learning techniques to classify the atomicity violation report. Our experimental evaluation shows that the proposed method is effective in identifying the benign atomicity violation warnings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document