tonal stimulus
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

3
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

1
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Marynewich ◽  
Lorienne M. Jenstad ◽  
David R. Stapells

Slow cortical potentials (SCPs) are currently of great interest in the hearing aid fitting process for infants; however, there is conflicting evidence in the literature concerning the use of SCPs for this purpose. The current study investigated SCP amplitudes and latencies in young normal-hearing listeners in response to a 60 ms duration tonal stimulus (1000 Hz) presented at three intensities (30, 50, and 70 dB SPL) in aided and unaided conditions using three hearing aids (Analog, DigitalA, and DigitalB) with two gain settings (20 and 40 dB). Results showed that SCP amplitudes were smaller for the digital hearing aids compared with the analog hearing aid, and none of the hearing aids resulted in a reliable increase in response amplitude relative to the unaided across conditions. SCP latencies in analog conditions were not significantly different from latencies in the unaided conditions; however, both digital hearing aids resulted in significantly delayed SCP latencies. The results of the current study (as well as several previous studies) indicate that the SCP may not accurately reflect the amplified stimulus expected from the prescribed hearing aids. Thus, “aided-SCP” results must be interpreted with caution, and more research is required concerning possible clinical use of this technique.


1963 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 731-733
Author(s):  
George E. Passey ◽  
Donald F. Hoelle

Four groups of 15 Ss each acquired conditioned eyelid responses to a 1024-cps tonal stimulus delivered at 40 db above threshold. While the arithmetic mean intensity of the reinforcing airpuff was held constant, reinforcement was varied about the mean in distributions which varied in shape. Seventy acquisition trials were given. Distribution shape differences failed to produce differences in the form of acquisition curves or in the total number of anticipatory responses during acquisition.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document