Not immune to inequity: minority under-representation in immunotherapy trials for breast and gynecologic cancers

ObjectiveTo describe the participation of minority women in clinical trials using immunologic agents for breast and gynecologic cancers.MethodsA retrospective review of completed clinical trials involving immunotherapy for breast and gynecologic cancers was performed. Completed trials were examined for data on race, tumor type, and start year. Minority enrollment was stratified by tumor site. Based on Center for Disease Control and Prevention age-adjusted incidence for race, expected and observed ratios of racial participation were calculated and compared using Χ2 testing, p≤0.05.ResultsA total of 53 completed immunotherapy clinical trials involving 8820 patients were reviewed. Breast cancer trials were most common (n=24) and involved the most patients (n=6248, 71%). Racial breakdown was provided in 41 studies (77%) for a total of 7201 patients. Race reporting was lowest in uterine (n=4, 67%) and cervical cancer trials (n=6, 67%), and highest in ovarian cancer trials (n=12, 86%). White patients comprised 70% (n=5022) of all the patients included. Only 5% of patients involved were black (n=339), and 83% of these patients (n=282) were enrolled in breast cancer trials. Observed enrollment of black women was 32-fold lower for ovarian, 19-fold lower for cervical, 15-fold lower for uterine, and 11-fold lower for breast cancer than expected. While all trials reported race between 2013 and 2015, no consistent trend was seen towards increasing race reporting or in enrollment of black patients over time.ConclusionRacial disparities exist in clinical trials evaluating immunologic agents for breast and gynecologic cancers. Recruitment of black women is particularly low. In order to address inequity in outcomes for these cancers, it is crucial that significant attention be directed towards minority representation in immuno-oncologic clinical trials.

Race and ethnicity do not impact eligibility for remdesivir- a single-center experience

As the Coronavirus-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic continues, multiple therapies are rapidly being tested for efficacy in clinical trials. Clinical trials should be racially and ethnically representative of the population that will eventually benefit from these medications. There are multiple potential barriers to racial and ethnic minority enrollment in clinical trials, one of which could be that inclusion and exclusion criteria select for certain racial or ethnic groups disproportionately. In this observational cohort study at a single health care system, we examined if there were differences in eligibility for treatment with remdesivir based on clinical trial criteria for racial and ethnic minorities compared to non-Hispanic Whites. 201 electronic medical record charts were reviewed manually. Self-identified Whites were older than other racial or ethnic groups. At the time of presentation, Black, Latinx, and White participants met inclusion criteria for remdesivir at similar rates (72%, 80%, and 73% respectively), exclusion criteria at similar rates (43%, 38% and 49% for Black, Latinx and White participants respectively). In this study, there was no difference in eligibility for remdesivir based on race or ethnicity alone.

Minority Enrollment in Parkinson’s Disease Clinical Trials: Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Studies Evaluating Treatment of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms

Background: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in Parkinson’s disease (PD) have historically enrolled a low number of underrepresented minorities, lessening the generalizability of therapeutic developments. Although there are racial disparities in PD, little is known regarding neuropsychiatric symptoms and other nonmotor manifestations across all races/ethnicities. Objective: To assess minority participation in PD trials evaluating the treatment of neuropsychiatric symptoms and explore underlying reasons. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed and Embase for RCTs with a primary goal of treating neuropsychiatric symptoms in PD patients from 2000-2019. The pooled prevalence and 95% confidence interval (CI) of being white and enrolled in a clinical trial was calculated using the inverse variance method. I-square was calculated as a measure of heterogeneity and meta-regression was used to evaluate temporal trends. Results: We included 63 RCTs with a total of 7,973 patients. In pooled analysis, 11 (17.5%) RCTs reported race/ethnicity. Of studies reporting this data, 5 African American (0.2%), 16 Hispanics (0.64%), and 539 Asians (21.44%) were enrolled. The pooled prevalence of being white in clinical trials was 98% (CI 0.97–0.98, p < 0.001), with 1,908 patients (75.8%). NIH-funded studies were most likely to report racial data when compared to non-NIH trials (p = 0.032). Conclusion: This large pooled analysis found a small percentage of RCTs reporting race/ethnicity when evaluating treatment of neuropsychiatric symptoms in PD. There was a disproportionally high number of white patients when compared to African Americans and Hispanics. More studies are needed to investigate this discrepancy and improve rates of & minority enrollment in PD trials.