Population model of Temnothorax albipennis as a distributed dynamical system: I. self-consistent threshold is an emergent property in combination of quorum sensing and chemical perception of limited resource

House hunting of ant, such as Temnothorax albipennis, has been shown to be a distributed dynamical system. Such a system includes agent-based algorithm [1], with agents in different roles including nest exploration, nest assessment, quorum sensing, and brood item transportation. Such an algorithm, if used properly, can be applied on artificial intelligent system, like robotic swarms. Despite of its complexity, we are focusing on the quorum sensing mechanism, which is also observed in bacteria model. In bacterial model, multiple biochemical networks co-exist within each cell, including binding of autoinducer and cognate receptors, and phosphorylation-dephosphorylation cycle. In ant hunting, we also have ant commitment to the nest, mimicking binding between autoinducer and cognate receptors. We also have assessment ant specific to one nest and information exchange between two assessment ants corresponding to different nests, which is similar process to the phosphorylation-dephosphorylation cycle in bacteria quorum sensing network. Due to the similarity between the two models, we borrow the idea from bacteria quorum sensing to clarify the definition of quorum threshold through biological plausible mechanism related to limited resource model. We further made use of the contraction analysis to explore the trade-off between decision split and decision consensus within ant population. Our work provides new generation model for understanding how ant adapt to the changing environment during quorum sensing.

Rational time investment during collective decision making in Temnothorax ants

The study of rational choice in humans and other animals typically focuses on decision outcomes, but rationality also applies to decision latencies, especially when time is scarce and valuable. For example, the smaller the difference in quality between two options, the faster a rational actor should decide between them. This is because the consequences of choosing the inferior option are less severe if the options are similar. Experiments have shown, however, that humans irrationally spend more time choosing between similar options. In this study, we assessed the rationality of time investment during nest-site choice by the rock ant, Temnothorax albipennis . Previous studies have shown that collective decision-making allows ant colonies to avoid certain irrational errors. Here we show that the same is true for time investment. Individual ants, like humans, irrationally took more time to complete an emigration when choosing between two similar nests than when choosing between two less similar nests. Whole colonies, by contrast, rationally made faster decisions when the options were more similar. We discuss the underlying mechanisms of decision-making in individuals and colonies and how they lead to irrational and rational time investment, respectively.

Ants show a leftward turning bias when exploring unknown nest sites

Behavioural lateralization in invertebrates is an important field of study because it may provide insights into the early origins of lateralization seen in a diversity of organisms. Here, we present evidence for a leftward turning bias in Temnothorax albipennis ants exploring nest cavities and in branching mazes, where the bias is initially obscured by thigmotaxis (wall-following) behaviour. Forward travel with a consistent turning bias in either direction is an effective nest exploration method, and a simple decision-making heuristic to employ when faced with multiple directional choices. Replication of the same bias at the colony level would also reduce individual predation risk through aggregation effects, and may lead to a faster attainment of a quorum threshold for nest migration. We suggest the turning bias may be the result of an evolutionary interplay between vision, exploration and migration factors, promoted by the ants' eusociality.

Seasonality in communication and collective decision-making in ants

The ability of animals to adjust their behaviour according to seasonal changes in their ecology is crucial for their fitness. Eusocial insects display strong collective behavioural seasonality, yet the mechanisms underlying such changes are poorly understood. We show that nest preference by emigrating Temnothorax albipennis ant colonies is influenced by a season-specific modulatory pheromone that may help tune decision-making according to seasonal constraints. The modulatory pheromone triggers aversion towards low-quality nests and enhances colony cohesion in summer and autumn, but not after overwintering—in agreement with reports that field colonies split in spring and reunite in summer. Interestingly, we show that the pheromone acts by downgrading the perceived value of marked nests by informed and naive individuals. This contrasts with theories of collective intelligence, stating that accurate collective decision-making requires independent evaluation of options by individuals. The violation of independence highlighted here was accordingly shown to increase error rate during emigrations. However, this is counterbalanced by enhanced cohesion and the transmission of valuable information through the colony. Our results support recent claims that optimal decisions are not necessarily those that maximize accuracy. Other criteria—such as cohesion or reward rate—may be more relevant in animal decision-making.

Economic investment by ant colonies in searches for better homes

Organisms should invest more in gathering information when the pay-off from finding a profitable resource is likely to be greater. Here, we ask whether animal societies put more effort in scouting for a new nest when their current one is of low quality. We measured the scouting behaviour of Temnothorax albipennis ant colonies when they inhabit nest-sites with different combinations of desirable attributes. We show that the average probability of an ant scouting decreases significantly with an increase in the quality of the nest in which the colony currently resides. This means that the greater the potential gain from finding a new nest, the more effort a colony puts into gathering information regarding new nest-sites. Our results show, for the first time to our knowledge, the ability of animal societies to respond collectively to the quality of a resource they currently have at their disposal (e.g. current nest-site) and regulate appropriately their information gathering efforts for finding an alternative (e.g. a potentially better nest-site).