balanced budget act
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

77
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

13
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
Luc Godbout

The burden of Quebec's debt has changed significantly since 1960. While the province incurred very little debt in the years before the Quiet Revolution, its borrowing increased steadily from 1961 until the mid-1990s. By the time the trend was reversed, the Quebec government had recorded a deficit for 40 consecutive years. Having achieved one of the heaviest debt burdens, measured as a share of gross domestic product, among the Canadian provinces, and having seen two rapid downgrades of its credit rating by Moody's in the mid-1990s, fearing a further downgrade the Quebec government took steps to clean up its public finances. After outlining the evolution of Quebec's debt since the early 1960s, this article briefly describes two statutes enacted by the government to provide greater transparency with respect to the province's finances, enabling better management of its budget and debt. These statutes are the Balanced Budget Act, passed in 1996, and the Act To Reduce the Debt and Establish the Generations Fund, passed in 2006. The article discusses the impact of the Great Recession on the province's budgetary balance and indebtedness, and shows how Quebec's financial situation has changed in terms of its fiscal balance, debt, debt interest, and credit rating. It is now possible to affirm that the two statutes adopted by the government have clearly helped to improve Quebec's fiscal position.


2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 413-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Eger ◽  
Maximiliano G. Mendieta

This study sheds light on the effects of policies that introduce competition into the marketplace of the provision of government services. The outcomes indicate that both nonprofit and government market share in a state are negatively affected by for-profit entry, a substitution relationship. The framing of the article in the New Public Management era and the Balanced Budget Act (BBA) of 1997 provides context in which to assess the policy consequences in hospice care. Given the budgetary challenges and growing cost of health care, this analysis begins a discussion of the effects of for-profit entry into the provision of government services, providing a glimpse into what the future holds for hospice care in the reforms of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) of 2010.


2015 ◽  
Vol 3;18 (3;5) ◽  
pp. E273-E292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laxmaiah Manchikanti

The Balanced Budget Act which became law in 1997 was designed to help stem the increasing in costs of healthcare. The Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) formula was incorporated into that law as a method of helping balance the budget through a complex formula tying reimbursement to the growth in the economy. Soon after its inception, the flawed nature of the formula, linking the balancing of the federal budget to physician professional fees was realized. Congress has provided multiple short-term fixes known as SGR patches over the years so as to avoid generally progressively larger negative corrections to professional reimbursement. The near annual SGR correction requirement has been compared to Groundhog Day in the legislative arena. Over the years, physician and other providers faced numerous looming, large cuts. Most recently, on April 1, 2015 physicians faced a 21.2% cut in provider payments. To the surprise of many, in April 2015 a bipartisan bicameral effort permanently repealed the Medicare SGR formula for controlling provider payment. The repeal of SGR means the temporary measures to override the growth rate formula will no longer dominate Medicare policy discussions and now the focus turns to continue payment reforms. The MACRA provides physicians and other health care professionals with stable fee update for 5 years and it follows with a new incentive program, termed the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) replacing and consolidating preexisting incentive payment programs: meaningful use of electronic health records (EHR), physician quality reporting system, and the value-based payment modified. Thus, payments to clinicians will be subjected to adjustments based on participation in MIPS or other approved alternative payment mechanisms. This legislation also creates numerous other regulations. The MACRA has been criticized for providing insufficient statutory updates, enacting a flawed quality and performance improvement program associated with MIPS and inappropriate use of utilization and payment data. Thus, the MACRA offers physicians a predictable schedule for Medicare rates – a carrot, and controls the physician behaviors with payment reforms analogous to a stick. Thus, it could be said that this legislation embodies some good, bad, and ugly aspects. Key words: Balanced Budget Act, sustainable growth rate, alternative payment models, Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015, Merit-based Incentive Payment System, payment reform, payment modernization, health information technology


2010 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gonzalo Rivera, Jr.

<p class="MsoBodyText" style="text-align: justify; margin: 0in 0.5in 0pt 40.5pt; mso-pagination: none;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">Beginning October 1, 2000, as required by the Balanced Budget Act (BBA) of 1997 and related amendments, Medicare began to reimburse home health agencies for home health services under the new Home Health Prospective Payment System (HHPPS). Under HHPPS, all home health costs for services including medical supplies are paid using a basic unit of payment known as the 60-Day Episode. The amount of the payment is calculated using a national standardized rate, adjusted for case mix and a wage index based on the site of service. For 60-Day Episodes beginning and ending in 2008, the Medicare HHPPS national standardized rate was updated by a new 153 case mix grouping and a new wage index value determined by the site of service for the patient.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>The August 29,2008 ( 72 FR 49792) and November 30, 2008( 72 FR 67656) Federal Registers discuss the &ldquo;Home Health Prospective Payment System Refinement and Rate Update For Calendar Year 2008&rdquo; changes which include a rebasing and revising of the home health market basket resulting in new labor portion percentage of 77.082 and non-labor portion percentage of 22.918, the new LUPA (Low Utilization Payment Adjustments) per visit payment amounts, the inclusion of an<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>additional payment for NRS ( Non-Routine Supplies), elimination of the SCIC(Significant Change In Condition) payment, and adjustments to PEP ( Partial Episode Payment) and Outlier payments. This paper discusses an overview of the updated 2008 Medicare HHPPS national standardized rate for CY 2009.</span></span></p>


Medical Care ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 279-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meredith L. Kilgore ◽  
David C. Grabowski ◽  
Michael A. Morrisey ◽  
Christine S. Ritchie ◽  
Huifeng Yun ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document