goal formation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

35
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

6
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
pp. 228-244
Author(s):  
V. Rybalka

The article highlights the psychogenetical and psychopedagogical bases of the transition from giftedness to talent and genius of personality, including intensive systematic work and proficiency, аnd such special phenomena of creative activities of personality as impression, idea-fix, amplification, strategy and tactical differentiation of goal formation, its effective implementation as a matter of life and the affectation of success. These psychogenetical and psychopedagogical bases ensure the inclusion of man in the civilizational process of  development of humanity and the individual as a subject of this process


2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 471-487
Author(s):  
Desmond Ng ◽  
Harvey S. James Jr ◽  
Peter G. Klein

PurposeAs the prioritization of family goals depends on the resolution of family conflict, this study's purpose is to explain how a dominant coalition (DC) of parental family members prioritizes their family economic and non-economic goals when faced with different types of family conflict.Design/methodology/approachA conceptual framework is developed drawing on a socio-cognitive approach to explain a family's goal formation process. This socio-cognitive approach extends the stakeholder salience underpinnings of family influence/essence theory. It shows that family conflict arises from the complex and novel social settings of a family business and that a DC prioritizes their family's goals by drawing on heuristic biases to resolve such family conflict.FindingsA key finding of this study is the introduction of a distinct type of agency to family influence/essence research. Unlike the salient explanations, a family's goal formulation process is attributed to a DC's heuristic response in resolving their family business conflict.Originality/valueScholars have called for a greater need to investigate the social and cognitive underpinnings of a family's goal formation process. While the social settings of a family business are often explained in terms of family conflict, an understanding of the sources of such conflict and their resolution have received limited attention. This study opens new avenues to understanding the sources of such family conflict and the cognitive mechanisms needed to overcome them. This understanding is critical not only to the prioritization of a family's goals but also to the idea that “influence” defines the essence of a family business.


2020 ◽  
Vol 132 (4) ◽  
pp. 1261-1264
Author(s):  
Steven O. Tenny ◽  
Kyle P. Schmidt ◽  
William E. Thorell

OBJECTIVEThe Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) has pushed for more frequent and comprehensive feedback for residents during their training, but there is scant evidence for how neurosurgery residents view the current feedback system as it applies to providing information for self-improvement and goal formation. The authors sought to assess neurosurgery resident and staff perceptions of the current resident feedback system in providing specific, meaningful, achievable, realistic, and timely (SMART) goals. The authors then created a pilot project to improve the most unfavorably viewed aspect of the feedback system.METHODSThe authors conducted an anonymous survey of neurosurgery residents and staff at an academic medical institution to assess SMART goals for resident feedback and used the results to create a pilot intervention to address the most unfavorably viewed aspect of the feedback system. The authors then conducted a postintervention survey to see if perceptions had improved for the target of the intervention.RESULTSNeurosurgery residents and staff completed an anonymous online survey, for which the results indicated that resident feedback was not occurring in a timely manner. The authors created a simple anonymous feedback form. The form was distributed monthly to neurosurgery residents, neurosurgical staff, and nurses, and the results were reported monthly to each resident for 6 months. A postintervention survey was then administered, and the results indicated that the opinions of the neurosurgery residents and staff on the timeliness of resident feedback had changed from a negative to a nonnegative opinion (p = 0.01).CONCLUSIONSThe required ACGME feedback methods may not be providing adequate feedback for goal formation for self-improvement for neurosurgery residents. Simple interventions, such as anonymous feedback questionnaires, can improve neurosurgery resident and staff perception of feedback to residents for self-improvement and goal formation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 329-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph I. Williams ◽  
Torsten M. Pieper ◽  
Franz W. Kellermanns ◽  
Joseph H. Astrachan

2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 138-139
Author(s):  
Eliza Bliss-Moreau ◽  
Lisa A. Williams
Keyword(s):  

AbstractBuilding upon Huang & Bargh's (H&B's) theory, we propose a complementary view that goal formation and selection are both supported by affect. We suggest that goals may form when affect “tags” discrete behaviors and their outcomes. Further, we propose that goal-associated affect may help guide selection between competing goals, for example, in the case of short-term and long-term goals.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document