unexpected perturbation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

9
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
Anatolii V. Perelmuter

The problem of the differences in the possible reaction of a structure to an unexpected perturbation is considered, taking into account the fact that the limiting state of a structure is a rare phenomenon and most of the time the design is very far from this state. A special measure of the specified quality of the structure is proposed, called mobilization.


2014 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 482-490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-Ching Tsai ◽  
Lin-Fen Hsieh ◽  
Saiwei Yang

Haemophilia ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. e311-e315 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. M. B. De SOUZA ◽  
R. P. PEREIRA ◽  
N. P. MINUQUE ◽  
C. M. Do CARMO ◽  
M. H. M. De MELLO ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 287-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin M. Stanek ◽  
Todd A. McLoda ◽  
Val J. Csiszer ◽  
A.J. Hansen

Context:Selected muscles in the kinetic chain may help explain the body’s ability to avert injury during unexpected perturbation.Objective:To determine the activation of the ipsilateral rectus femoris (RF), gluteus maximus (MA), gluteus medius (ME), and contralateral external obliques (EO) during normal and perturbed gait.Design:Single-factor, repeated measures.Setting:University research laboratory.Participants:32 physically active, college-age subjects.Intervention:Subjects walked a total of 20 trials the length of a 6.1-m custom runway capable of releasing either side into 30° of unexpected inversion. During 5 trials, the platform released into inversion.Main Outcome Measures:Average, peak, and time to peak EMG were analyzed across the 4 muscles, and comparisons were made between the walking trials and perturbed trials.Results:Significantly higher average and peak muscle activity were noted for the perturbed condition for RF, MA, and EO. Time to peak muscle activity was faster during the perturbed condition for the EO.Conclusion:Rapid contractions of selected postural muscles in the kinetic chain help explain the body’s reaction to unexpected perturbation.


2011 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 439-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher K. Rhea ◽  
Shirley Rietdyk

2002 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 281-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masaaki Honda ◽  
Akinori Fujino ◽  
Tokihiko Kaburagi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document