Types of screening tools used to identify potential inappropriate medication in the geriatric

Inappropriate intake of medications can increase the risk of many morbidities and mortality among the geriatric population. Therefore, assessment of drug underuse, overuse, and inappropriate use has been an area of interest across the different investigations, and according to which, different screening tools were developed to identify these problems and enhance the quality of care to these patients. In the present study, we aim comprehensively discuss the different types of currently reported screening tools that can identify potentially inappropriate medication in the geriatric population. Studies show that assess, review, minimize, optimize, reassess (ARMOR), and medication appropriateness index (MAI) tools are the most commonly reported for this purpose to appropriately evaluate drug administration practices. However, they are time-consuming and need adequately trained personnel, which might not be available within the different settings. Accordingly, we suggest that more than one tool should be used, as we have reviewed all the advantages and disadvantages of the modality within the current study, to adequately facilitate and make the process of evaluation easy and enhance the quality of care for the geriatric population.

The impact of medication reconciliation and review in patients using oral chemotherapy

Background and aim Verifying and reviewing a patients medication list can detect and reduce drug related problems (DRPs). However little is known about its effects in patients using oral chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of these interventions and the adapted Medication Appropriateness Index (aMAI) as a tool to carry out a medication review. Methods A case-control study was carried out. The hospital pharmacist performed a medication reconciliation and medication review, using the aMAI tool, in 54 patients starting oral chemotherapy. Discrepancies, DRP's and associated pharmaceutical interventions were reported via the electronic patient record (EPR). After one month, the acceptance rate was measured and the aMAI score recalculated. Kappa statistics were used to test intra- and interrater reliability. Results The medication list in the EPR was incomplete in 74,1% of patients with an average of 2.4 errors per patient. After medication review, the aMAI score decreased significantly from 7.2 to 5.4 (SD = 4,7; p <0.001), indicating an improvement in the appropriateness of the drugs patients were taking. Acceptance rates were 41,4% and 53,2% for advices resulting from medication reconciliation and medication review respectively. Kappa values of 0.90 and 0.70 respectively indicate good intra- and interrater reliability. Discussion and conclusion The study shows that medication reconciliation can identify and address discrepancies. Furthermore, medication review seems to ensure that drug treatment better meets patient needs. The aMAI was a reliable tool. Future research will have to determine the clinical relevance of these interventions.

Polypharmacy Management in the Older Adults: A Scoping Review of Available Interventions

Background: Polypharmacy paves the way for non-adherence, adverse drug reactions, negative health outcomes, increased use of healthcare services and rising costs. Since it is most prevalent in the older adults, there is an urgent need for introducing effective strategies to prevent and manage the problem in this age group.Purpose: To perform a scoping review critically analysing the available literature referring to the issue of polypharmacy management in the older adults and provide narrative summary.Data sources: Articles published between January 2010–March 2018 indexed in CINHAL, EMBASE and PubMed addressing polypharmacy management in the older adults.Results: Our search identified 49 papers. Among the identified interventions, the most often recommended ones involved various types of drug reviews based on either implicit or explicit criteria. Implicit criteria-based approaches are used infrequently due to their subjectivity, and limited implementability. Most of the publications advocate the use of explicit criteria, such as e.g. STOPP/START, Beers and Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI). However, their applicability is also limited due to long lists of potentially inappropriate medications covered. To overcome this obstacle, such instruments are often embedded in computerised clinical decision support systems.Conclusion: Multiple approaches towards polypharmacy management are advised in current literature. They vary in terms of their complexity, applicability and usability, and no “gold standard” is identifiable. For practical reasons, explicit criteria-based drug reviews seem to be advisable. Having in mind that in general, polypharmacy management in the older adults is underused, both individual stakeholders, as well as policymakers should strengthen their efforts to promote these activities more strongly.

Managing Polypharmacy and Deprescribing in Elderly

The increase in the number of medications used may result many negative consequences for patients and health system. Elderly patients are more likely to encounter these health problems associated with polypharmacy. Deprescribing, the process of tapering, withdrawing, discontinuing, or stopping medications, is important in reducing polypharmacy, adverse drug effects, inappropriate or ineffective medication use, and costs. Deprescribing in elderly patients in accordance with the evidence based guidelines has many positive outcomes in older people such as decrease in the risk of falls, improvement in cognition, and improvement in patients’ global health status. Therefore, each visit of an elderly patient should be considered as an opportunity to evaluate the unnecessary use or harms of the prescribed or nonprescribed medications. Clinicians should decide to deprescription process by individualized care goals in line with current guidelines. Beers Criteria, STOPP/START and The Medication Appropriateness Index-MAI can be used to assit clinicians to identify unnecessary or potentially inappropriate drugs and reduce the number of medications in older patients. But, a balance is required between over and under prescribing. In conclusion, prevention of polypharmacy and withdrawing unneccesary and inappropriate medications may be the best clinical decision for family physicians who follow the elderly in primary care.

MULTIPAP Study: Improving healthcare for patients with multimorbidity

BackgroundThe steady rise in multimorbidity entails serious consequences for our populations, challenges healthcare systems, and calls for specific clinical approaches of proven effectiveness. The MULTIPAP Study comprises three sequential projects (MULTIPAP and MULTIPAP Plus RCTs, and the MULTIPAP Cohort). Results of MULTIPAP RCT are presented.AimTo evaluate the effectiveness of a complex, patient-centred intervention in young-old patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy.MethodPragmatic cluster-randomised clinical trial in a primary healthcare setting. GPs were randomly allocated to either conventional care or the MULTIPAP intervention based on the Ariadne Principles with two components: GPs e-training (that is, eMULTIPAP addresses specific, key concepts on multimorbidity, polypharmacy and shared decision-making) and GP–patient-centred interview. Young-old patients aged 65–74 years with multimorbidity and polypharmacy were included. Main outcome: difference in the Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI) after 6-month follow-up between groups. Secondary outcomes: MAI, quality of life, patient perception, health services use, treatment adherence and cost-effectiveness after 12-month follow-up.Results117 GPs from 38 Spanish primary health care recruited 593 patients randomly assigned to the intervention/control groups. Difference in MAI scores between groups in the intention-to-treat analysis after 6 months’ follow-up: −2.42 (−4.27 to −0.59), P = 0.009 (adjusted difference in mean MAI score −1.81(−3.35 to −0.27), P = 0.021). Secondary outcomes: not significant, including quality of life (adjusted difference in mean EQ-5D-5L (VAS) 2.94 (−1.39 to 7.28), P = 0.183, EQ-5D-5L (index) −0.006(−0.034 to 0.022), P = 0.689).ConclusionThe intervention significantly improved medication appropriateness. The observed quality of life improvement was not significant. GPs e-training in multimorbidity has shown to be feasible and well accepted by the professionals. Future studies may test whether this format facilitates implementation.

EVALUATION OF PRESCRIPTION WITH POLYPHARMACY AMONG GERIATRIC POPULATION IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL: A PROSPECTIVE CROSS SECTIONAL STUDY

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Elderly population are the largest consumers of prescribed drugs and are the most vulnerable groups in our society. Prescribing for older patients presents many unique challenges, particularly with respect to variables such as polypharmacy, altered pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics responses. This study was carried out to evaluate the appropriateness of prescription in geriatric population by using medication appropriateness index METHOD This Prospective, observational cross-sectional study was carried out in 100 patients for 6 months at Vijaya Hospital, Vadapalani. The study participants included inpatients of either gender, age greater than 65 years and patients receiving more than 4 medications. The outpatients, patients with cancer and HIV were excluded from the study. Data was collected in data collection form and each drug in a prescription was analysed and scored by using Medication Appropriateness Index questionnaire (MAI). RESULTS Out of 1012 drugs prescribed among 100 patients, a total of 912 drugs (90.12%) were considered to be appropriate whereas 100 drugs (9.88%) were considered to be inappropriate. The major category of inappropriate prescribing encountered in our study was ineffective medications (5.03%) for different conditions based on Beers criteria. Prescription analysis of the drug chart indicate, the drugs with least expensive alternative comprises 1.08% followed by impractical directions (0.69%), drug-disease interactions (0.39%), unnecessary duplications (0.39%) and incorrect directions (0.19%). The mean MAI score of inappropriate prescribing per drug was 0.02 ± 0.23 and score per patient was 0.22 ± 0. 55. CONCLUSION The data from the present study shows that 9.88% of drugs prescribed were considered to be inappropriate. A clinical pharmacist can reduce the frequency of inappropriate prescribing by regular medication chart review and thereby reducing polypharmacy

A Collaborative Medication Review Including Deprescribing for Older Patients in an Emergency Department: A Longitudinal Feasibility Study

Medication review for older patients with polypharmacy in the emergency department (ED) is crucial to prevent inappropriate prescribing. Our objective was to assess the feasibility of a collaborative medication review in older medical patients (≥65 years) using polypharmacy (≥5 long-term medications). A pharmacist performed the medication review using the tools: Screening Tool of Older Persons’ potentially inappropriate Prescriptions (STOPP) criteria, a drug–drug interaction database (SFINX), and Renbase® (renal dosing database). A geriatrician received the medication review and decided which recommendations should be implemented. The outcomes were: differences in Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI) and Assessment of Underutilization Index (AOU) scores between admission and 30 days after discharge and the percentage of patients for which the intervention was completed before discharge. Sixty patients were included from the ED, the intervention was completed before discharge for 50 patients (83%), and 39 (61.5% male; median age 80 years) completed the follow-up 30 days after discharge. The median MAI score decreased from 14 (IQR 8-20) at admission to 8 (IQR 2-13) 30 days after discharge (p < 0.001). The number of patients with an AOU score ≥1 was reduced from 36% to 10% (p < 0.001). Thirty days after discharge, 83% of the changes were sustained and for 28 patients (72%), 1≥ medication had been deprescribed. In conclusion, a collaborative medication review and deprescribing intervention is feasible to perform in the ED.