objective stress rate
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

9
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

4
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
Mehrdad Palizi ◽  
Salvatore Federico ◽  
Samer Adeeb

Abstract In hypoelastic constitutive models, an objective stress rate is related to the rate of deformation through an elasticity tensor. The Truesdell, Jaumann, and Green–Naghdi rates of the Cauchy and Kirchhoff stress tensors are examples of the objective stress rates. The finite element analysis software ABAQUS uses a co-rotational frame which is based on the Jaumann rate for solid elements and on the Green–Naghdi rate for shell and membrane elements. The user subroutine UMAT is the platform to implement a general constitutive model into ABAQUS, but, in order to update the Jacobian matrix in UMAT, the model must be expressed in terms of the Jaumann rate of the Kirchhoff stress tensor. This study aims to formulate and implement various hypoelastic constitutive models into the ABAQUS UMAT subroutine. The developed UMAT subroutine codes are validated using available solutions, and the consequence of using wrong Jacobian matrices is elucidated. The UMAT subroutine codes are provided in the “Electronic Supplementary Material” repository for the user’s consideration.


2019 ◽  
Vol 286 ◽  
pp. 02005
Author(s):  
H. Karim Serroukh ◽  
M. Mabssout

We present a new meshless method, Taylor-SPH, for the numerical analysis of large deformation dynamic problems. This method is based on the previous work developed by the authors to solve solid dynamics problems within the framework of small deformation theory. The governing equations are given in terms of stress and velocity using the updated Lagrangian approach. The Jaumann rate of the Cauchy stress is used to get an objective stress rate tensor. The Taylor-SPH method is based on two sets of particles resulting on avoiding the classical tensile instability. In order to assess the accuracy of the proposed method, numerical examples based on elastic material involving large deformation are solved.


2013 ◽  
Vol 80 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Vorel ◽  
Zdeněk P. Bažant ◽  
Mahendra Gattu

Most commercial finite element codes, such as ABAQUS, LS-DYNA, ANSYS and NASTRAN, use as the objective stress rate the Jaumann rate of Cauchy (or true) stress, which has two flaws: It does not conserve energy since it is not work-conjugate to any finite strain tensor and, as previously shown for the case of sandwich columns, does not give a correct expression for the work of in-plane forces during buckling. This causes no appreciable errors when the skins and the core are subdivided by several layers of finite elements. However, in spite of a linear elastic behavior of the core and skins, the errors are found to be large when either the sandwich plate theory with the normals of the core remaining straight or the classical equivalent homogenization as an orthotropic plate with the normals remaining straight is used. Numerical analysis of a plate intended for the cladding of the hull of a light long ship shows errors up to 40%. It is shown that a previously derived stress-dependent transformation of the tangential moduli eliminates the energy error caused by Jaumann rate of Cauchy stress and yields the correct critical buckling load. This load corresponds to the Truesdell objective stress rate, which is work-conjugate to the Green–Lagrangian finite strain tensor. The commercial codes should switch to this rate. The classical differential equations for buckling of elastic soft-core sandwich plates with a constant shear modulus of the core are shown to have a form that corresponds to the Truesdell rate and Green–Lagrangian tensor. The critical in-plane load is solved analytically from these differential equations with typical boundary conditions, and is found to agree perfectly with the finite element solution based on the Truesdell rate. Comparisons of the errors of various approaches are tabulated.


1995 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 733-739 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. Xia ◽  
F. Ellyin

A constitutive model for finite elastoplastic deformations is presented. This model incorporates two novel features: first, a strain-hardening law that is applicable to complex loading paths and histories; and second, an objective stress-rate measure that is based on the spin of an orthogonal triad of material unit vectors which instantaneously coincides with the principal directions of the stress tensor. Problems of shear superposed on triaxial tension, cyclic shear deformation, and biaxial nonproportional loading are studied. It is shown that realistic predictions for the aforementioned problems are obtained by using the proposed constitutive model.


1971 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 919-928 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. P. Bazˇant

In the past a number of different linearized mathematical formulations of the infinitesimal incremental deformations of continuous bodies under initial stress have been proposed. The best-known formulations are reviewed, tabulated, and subjected to a comparative study. It is demonstrated that they can be derived as special cases of a unified general formulation, and are all correct and mutually equivalent. In each formulation, the incremental elasticity constants and the incremental material stress tensor have a different significance. Their mutual relationships are established. Thus the analysis of a problem which has already been solved according to one formulation need not be repeated for another formulation. Furthermore, the connections to the various definitions of the objective stress rate are shown. The arbitrariness of choice between the infinitely many possible forms of incremental equilibrium equations corresponds to the arbitrariness in the definitions of (a) the finite strain tensor, (b) the material stress tensor, (c) the objective stress rates, (d) the stability criterion, and (e) the elastic material in finite strain. For demonstration of the differences, the problems of surface buckling of an orthotropic half space and a column with shear are studied. It is shown that the predicted buckling stresses can differ almost by a ratio of 1:2 if the proper distinction between various formulations is not made.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document