munition constituents
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

13
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
Guilherme R. Lotufo ◽  
Robert D. George ◽  
Jason B. Belden ◽  
Christa M. Woodley ◽  
David L. Smith ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 23-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunther Rosen ◽  
Bill Wild ◽  
Robert D. George ◽  
Jason B. Belden ◽  
Guilherme R. Lotufo

AbstractAs a result of military training and weapon testing activities, unexploded ordnance (UXO; including munitions such as bombs, projectiles, and mines that did not function as intended) are present in underwater environments. Munitions are also present at underwater sites as discarded military munitions (DMM). In addition to explosive safety considerations, regulators are increasingly concerned about potential ecological impacts on the aquatic environment following corrosion and breaching shells that may cause the slow release of the explosive material by dissolution to the surrounding sediments and water column. Challenges such as the high level of effort required to identify leaking munitions and potential for slow and intermittent release resulting in ultralow concentrations (i.e., part per trillion) may hinder the assessment of environmental exposures using traditional water sampling and analysis techniques. Recently, integrative passive samplers, specifically polar organic chemical integrative samplers (POCIS), have been demonstrated by our team to be valuable tools for the environmental exposure assessment of munition constituents (MC) in aquatic environments. POCIS can be deployed for weeks to months and continuously sample the water, providing the opportunity to capture episodic events or fluctuations in contaminant release, even at low concentrations. The resulting time-weighted average (TWA) water concentration can then be compared with screening values in the context of ecological risk potential and relevance for remedial action. Our preliminary results from POCIS employed under field conditions indicate that it is a robust approach to understanding and validating the release and transport behaviors of MC and subsequent exposure characterization in the vicinity of potentially breached UXO or DMM in ocean environments.


Chemosphere ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 161 ◽  
pp. 429-437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuzhen Liang ◽  
Dave T.F. Kuo ◽  
Herbert E. Allen ◽  
Dominic M. Di Toro

2014 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 1035-1042
Author(s):  
Jonathon A. Brame ◽  
Alan J. Kennedy ◽  
Christopher D. Lounds ◽  
Anthony J. Bednar ◽  
Pedro J.J. Alvarez ◽  
...  

Chemosphere ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
pp. 807-816 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary A. Pascoe ◽  
Keith Kroeger ◽  
Dwight Leisle ◽  
Robert J. Feldpausch

2009 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 62-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Schwartz ◽  
Erika Brandenburg

AbstractStudies to understand the potential risks associated with underwater munitions are still in their infancy. Response actions are normally driven by risk. From an explosives safety perspective, the Department of Defense believes leaving underwater munitions in place is often the safest course of action. Additionally, the risks posed by underwater munitions (e.g., sea disposal sites) remain largely unknown. Thus, it is unlikely that munition responses requiring the recovery of underwater munitions will occur in the near future. The exception is where such munitions are determined to pose an imminent and substantial threat to human health and the environment.This article discusses technologies that can be used to characterize underwater munition sites, including bounding the site and sampling for any release of munition constituents. It also addresses technologies that can be used for recovery operations and for the disposal of any munitions. Navigation and underwater positioning are integral to all of these operations and are discussed separately.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document