Kepatuhan Penggunaan Obat terhadap Profil Lipid dan Lingkar Perut pada Pasien Sindrom Metabolik di Rumah Sakit di Semarang

Metabolic syndrome is a metabolic disorder caused by a complex increase in obesity. Metabolic syndrome can be controlled by adhering to medication and a healthy lifestyle. Patient's behavior towards adherence to medication is carried out in order to achieve the goal of treatment itself. The research objective was to determine the effect of medication adherence on lipid profiles and abdominal circumference in metabolic syndrome (SM) patients at Hospital in Semarang. This research is an observational research. Data were collected using a cross sectional design. Data collection in this study was conducted in August - December 2020. This study used the chi-square test, the chi-square test for abdominal circumference obtained results of 0.254 which said there was no effect of drug adherence with the abdominal circumference value and the chi-square test. for LDL, the results were 0.046 and the results were 0.001 for triglycerides, which is said to have an effect on drug adherence to LDL levels and trglyceride levels. The conclusion in this study is that there is an effect of patient drug use adherence to LDL (Low Density Lipoprotein) and triglyceride levels, while there is no effect of patient drug use adherence to abdominal circumference values.

Drug Adherence and Persistence of Patients with Moderate to Severe Psoriasis Treated with Biologic Medications in a US Commercially Insured Population

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Adalimumab (ADA), certolizumab pegol (CER), etanercept (ETA), guselkumab (GUS), ixekizumab (IXE), secukinumab (SEC), and ustekinumab (UST) are biologic medications approved in the USA for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis. We examined drug adherence and persistence of patients with moderate to severe psoriasis who initiated these seven biologic medications. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Adult patients with ≥1 pharmacy/medical claim for any of the seven psoriasis medications and ≥1 diagnosis of psoriasis in the previous 6 months between July 1, 2014 and June 30, 2019 were selected from the IBM MarketScan® Commercial Claims and Encounters Database. The index date was defined as the date of the first prescription fill. Patients were required to have continuous health plan enrollment during the 6 months prior to their index date and ≥9 months after. Patients were grouped into seven study cohorts based upon their index biologic medication. Adherence was measured using the proportion of days covered (PDC) and defined by a PDC ≥80%. Adherence and persistence with index biologic medications were examined during fixed follow-up periods of 3, 6, and 9 months, with a subpopulation analysis carried out among patients with 12 months of follow-up. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Among psoriasis patients with ≥9 months of continuous enrollment included in the study population, the number of those who initiated each biologic medication was 10,324 for ADA, 431 for CER, 3,092 for ETA, 821 for GUS, 1,766 for IXE, 4,132 for SEC, and 5,441 for UST. The mean age at the time of initiating biologic treatment was 46.9 years. During the 9-month follow-up period, the proportions of adherent patients (i.e., PDC ≥80%) were numerically higher among those treated with UST (59.9%) and GUS (56.9%), followed by those treated with SEC (46.1%), IXE (45.5%), ADA (44.7%), ETA (33.9%), and CER (22.0%). The proportions of patients who were persistent with their index biologic medication during the 9-month follow-up period were numerically higher among those treated with UST (70.1%) and GUS (67.8%), followed by those treated with IXE (47.3%), SEC (46.9%), ADA (28.7%), CER (14.8%), and ETA (10.7%). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In this large healthcare claims database analysis of psoriasis patients treated with seven different biologic medications, adherence was numerically higher among those treated with UST or GUS. UST and GUS were also associated with numerically greater persistence.

Regional and income disparities in treatment and drug adherence of patients with dyslipidemia: a retrospective cohort study in South Korea, 2003–2015

Backgrounds Health disparities represent a major public health problem that needs to be addressed, and a variety of factors, including geographical location and income, can contribute to these disparities. Although previous studies have suggested that health differs by region and income, evidence on the difference in treatment rate is relatively insufficient. To identify differences in prescription rates by region and income in patients with dyslipidemia. Methods Using data from the National Health Insurance Service senior cohort, we included older adults who were diagnosed with dyslipidemia in Korea from 2003 to 2015. Overall prescription rate was determined for patients with dyslipidemia. In addition, medication possession ratio and a defined daily dose were analyzed in patients who were prescribed statins. A generalized estimating equation Poisson model was used to assess differences in prescription rates. Results Patients living in rural areas (Chungcheong-do, Jeolla-do, and Gyeongsang-do) had a significantly higher prescription rate than those in metropolitan cities. Unlike the prescription rate, the drug adherence was significantly higher in Seoul, Gyeonggi-do, and Gangwon-do but lower in Jeolla-do and Gyeongsang-do than in metropolitan cities. Patients with low income had lower prescription rates than those with high income, but this difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion Our findings demonstrate differences in the treatment rates of patients with dyslipidemia by region and income. Appropriate interventions are needed in vulnerable regions and groups to increase the treatment rate for patients with dyslipidemia.

Treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases: focusing on 5-aminosalicylates and immunomodulators

Background: Recently, the incidence and prevalence rates of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have increased worldwide, including in Korea. Although there has been considerable progress in the management of IBD following the discovery of biologic agents, 5-aminosalicylate (5-ASA) and immunomodulators are still considered cornerstones in the management of mild to moderate IBD.Current Concepts: 5-ASA plays a key role in inducing remission in patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis. High doses of 5-ASA are more effective in inducing remission in patients with moderate ulcerative colitis, and combination therapy of oral 5-ASA and topical 5-ASA agents is recommended. Although the effect of 5-ASA in patients with Crohn disease is limited, high doses of 5-ASA can be effective for patients with mild disease, inflammatory behavior, and colonic involvement. Maintaining remission is essential for patients with IBD. Good doctor-patient relationships and encouraging drug adherence are recommended. Regarding drug adherence, a once-daily regimen is preferred for patients’ satisfaction. Thiopurines, the most important immunomodulators, show therapeutic benefits, such as steroid-sparing effects and remission maintenance in ulcerative colitis and Crohn disease after induction therapy. However, several side effects, including severe leukopenia, can induce the discontinuation of thiopurines. Close monitoring and management decisions should be individualized according to the risk of relapse and adverse events.Discussion and Conclusion: In conclusion, 5-ASA and immunomodulators are cornerstones in the management of IBD. As such, clinicians should have knowledge of these drugs and patients’ characteristics for proper prescription.