coalition functioning
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

11
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

7
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
Abigail A. Fagan ◽  
J. David Hawkins ◽  
Richard F. Catalano ◽  
David P. Farrington

This chapter reviews the importance of delivering community-based systems and EBIs with fidelity (i.e., in accordance with their implementation requirements) and sustaining these interventions over time. The chapter describes the training and technical support provided in CTC to ensure that coalitions take necessary actions to maintain their functioning in the long term and deliver EBIs in adherence to their core components and to their intended recipients. It is especially important that coalitions collect data on coalition functioning and EBI delivery and use these data when problems are identified. Examples of how CTC coalitions in the United States and other countries have engaged in these efforts are highlighted.


2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 1136-1146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie B. Shapiro ◽  
J. David Hawkins ◽  
Sabrina Oesterle

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 739-749 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikki Keene Woods ◽  
Jomella Watson-Thompson ◽  
Daniel J. Schober ◽  
Becky Markt ◽  
Stephen Fawcett

2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis D. Brown ◽  
Mark E. Feinberg ◽  
Valerie B. Shapiro ◽  
Mark T. Greenberg

2013 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 349-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. B. Shapiro ◽  
S. Oesterle ◽  
R. D. Abbott ◽  
M. W. Arthur ◽  
J. D. Hawkins

2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mimi Doll ◽  
Gary W. Harper ◽  
Grisel M. Robles-Schrader ◽  
Jason Johnson ◽  
Audrey K. Bangi ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 486-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis D. Brown ◽  
Mark E. Feinberg ◽  
Mark T. Greenberg

2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 63-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathaniel R. Riggs ◽  
Morgan Nakawatase ◽  
Mary Ann Pentz

2002 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 737-754 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryan J. Weiner ◽  
Jeffrey A. Alexander ◽  
Stephen M. Shortell

Community-based coalitions are a popular strategy for promoting community health despite the fact that coalitions often fail to achieve measurable results. Using a procedural justice framework, this study seeks to advance knowledge about the relationship between coalition governance and management processes and indicators of coalition functioning. Member survey data from 25 coalitions participating in the Community Care Network Demonstration Program were analyzed using two-stage least squares regression. Results show that personal influence in decision making, decision process clarity, and collaborative conflict resolution were significantly associated with procedural fairness perceptions. Procedural fairness perceptions, in turn, were positively associated with member satisfaction with coalition decisions, but not personal engagement in the coalition or organizational integration of coalition goals and activities. Personal influence in decision making and collaborative conflict resolution also exhibited direct relationships with all three indicators of coalition functioning examined in the study.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document