suboesophageal ganglion
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

119
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

26
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2020 ◽  
Vol 224 (1) ◽  
pp. jeb232116
Author(s):  
Luca Finetti ◽  
Lasse Tiedemann ◽  
Xiaoying Zhang ◽  
Stefano Civolani ◽  
Giovanni Bernacchia ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTMonoterpenes are molecules with insecticide properties whose mechanism of action is, however, not completely elucidated. Furthermore, they seem to be able to modulate the monoaminergic system and several behavioural aspects in insects. In particular, tyramine (TA) and octopamine (OA) and their associated receptors orchestrate physiological processes such as feeding, locomotion and metabolism. Here, we show that monoterpenes not only act as biopesticides in Drosophila species but also can cause complex behavioural alterations that require functional type 1 tyramine receptors (TAR1s). Variations in metabolic traits as well as locomotory activity were evaluated in both Drosophila suzukii and Drosophila melanogaster after treatment with three monoterpenes. A TAR1-defective D. melanogaster strain (TAR1PL00408) was used to better understand the relationships between the receptor and monoterpene-related behavioural changes. Immunohistochemistry analysis revealed that, in the D. melanogaster brain, TAR1 appeared to be mainly expressed in the pars intercerebralis, lateral horn, olfactory and optic lobes and suboesophageal ganglion lobes. In comparison to wild-type D. melanogaster, the TAR1PL00408 flies showed a phenotype characterized by higher triglyceride levels and food intake as well as lower locomotory activity. The monoterpenes, tested at sublethal concentrations, were able to induce a downregulation of the TAR1 coding gene in both Drosophila species. Furthermore, monoterpenes also altered the behaviour in wild-type D. suzukii and D. melanogaster 24 h after continuous monoterpene exposure. Interestingly, they were ineffective in modifying the physiological performance of TAR1-defective flies. In conclusion, it appears that monoterpenes not only act as biopesticides for Drosophila but also can interfere with Drosophila behaviour and metabolism in a TAR1-dependent fashion.


eLife ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
David W Sims ◽  
Nicolas E Humphries ◽  
Nan Hu ◽  
Violeta Medan ◽  
Jimena Berni

Efficient searching for resources such as food by animals is key to their survival. It has been proposed that diverse animals from insects to sharks and humans adopt searching patterns that resemble a simple Lévy random walk, which is theoretically optimal for ‘blind foragers’ to locate sparse, patchy resources. To test if such patterns are generated intrinsically, or arise via environmental interactions, we tracked free-moving Drosophila larvae with (and without) blocked synaptic activity in the brain, suboesophageal ganglion (SOG) and sensory neurons. In brain-blocked larvae, we found that extended substrate exploration emerges as multi-scale movement paths similar to truncated Lévy walks. Strikingly, power-law exponents of brain/SOG/sensory-blocked larvae averaged 1.96, close to a theoretical optimum (µ ≅ 2.0) for locating sparse resources. Thus, efficient spatial exploration can emerge from autonomous patterns in neural activity. Our results provide the strongest evidence so far for the intrinsic generation of Lévy-like movement patterns.


2010 ◽  
Vol 340 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuexiang Bao ◽  
Bin Wang ◽  
Jinbei Zhang ◽  
Ting Yan ◽  
Weiping Yang ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-209
Author(s):  
S. Sivaprasad ◽  
P. Muralimohan

The cephalo-thoracic musculature of the fifth instar larva of Bombyx mori comprises distinct groups of segmental muscle bands arranged in a stereotyped pattern. It includes dorsal, ventral, tergopleural, tergocoxal, lateral intersegmental, pleurosternal, sternocoxal, pleurocoxal and spiracular muscles. The cephalothoracic segments are innervated by the nerves of brain, suboesophageal ganglion (SG) and three thoracic ganglia (TG1, TG2, TG3).The brain gives nerves for compound eyes, antennae, labrum, frontal ganglion and the integument in the head. The SG, TG1,TG2,and TG3 give out a pair of lateral segmental nerves each, called the dorsal (DN) and ventral (VN) nerves. The DN of SG innervates muscles in the cephalic region, while its VN innervates muscles in the prothorax. The DN of thoracic ganglia innervates muscles in the dorsal, lateral and ventral regions of the hemi-segment while the VN innervates muscles in the ventral region. The innervation pattern indicates the presence of mixed nerves and multiple innervations that facilitate coordinated body movements and locomotion.


2008 ◽  
Vol 54 (5) ◽  
pp. 854-860 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Rand ◽  
Ariel Gueijman ◽  
Yael Zilberstein ◽  
Amir Ayali

2006 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 247-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans Smid ◽  
Brenda van der Zee ◽  
Maartje Bleeker

AbstractTwo closely related parasitoid wasp species, Cotesia glomerata L. and C. rubecula Marshall (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), differ in their display of associative learning and memory during host searching. As octopamine is involved in learning and memory in insects we investigated octopaminergic pathways in the brain and suboesophageal ganglion (SOG) of the two wasps. We used an anti-octopamine antibody and subsequent whole mount analysis using a confocal laserscanning microscope and pertinent software. Three groups of octopaminergic cells were located in the brain and suboesophageal ganglion. One group was located near the antennal lobes and consisted of six to eight cell bodies. A second group was located ventrally in the SOG and was most likely formed by ventral unpaired median (VUM) and VCBN (ventral cell body neurite) neurons. A third group was located in the pars intercerebralis and consisted of four to six cells. Octopamine-like immunoreactivity was furthermore present in the central body, protocerebral bridge, the SOG, antennal lobe, near the alpha and beta lobes of the mushroom bodies and in the mushroom body calyces. Due to the used methods and a high variability in staining intensity it was not possible to detect if there were any differences in the number of neurons, in arborisation patterns or in labelling intensity between the two wasp species.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document