Do NSAIDs Take Us Away From Treatment Goals in Axial Spondyloarthritis: A Story About Dysbiosis or Just a Matter of Bias?

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) remain the mainstay of treatment for spondyloarthritides (SpA), a group of entities with common clinical and pathophysiological aspects, but also with differential features. Although NSAIDs provide significant symptomatic relief, especially for joint pain and morning stiffness, their role in achieving and maintaining the treatment goals advocated by the treat to target strategy in SpA is not entirely clear. These agents can induce changes in the composition of the intestinal microbiota, also favoring an alteration of the barrier function in the gut epithelium. All of this, favored by a pre-disposing genetic background, could activate a specific type of aberrant immune response in the gut lamina propria, also known as type-3 immunity. This article offers a perspective on how NSAIDs, despite their undeniable value in the short-term SpA treatment, could hinder the achievement of medium and long-term treatment goals by compromising the barrier function of the gut mucosa and potentially altering the composition of the gut microbiota.

Predictive Factors for Achievement of Treatment Goals in Patients with Postmenopausal Osteoporosis Treated with Denosumab

Objectives To investigate efficacy of long-term treatment with denosumab and predictive factors for achievement of treatment goals in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO). Methods We enrolled 111 PMO patients who had T-scores ≤ -2.5 either at the lumbar spine (L-) or femoral neck (FN-), who had never been treated for osteoporosis, and who could be followed for at least 3 years. We first evaluated changes in bone mineral density (BMD) for up to 7 years. We next defined the treatment goal as the achievement of a T-score > -2.5 at month 36 and performed multivariate analysis to identify predictive factors for achievement of the goal. Results L- and FN-BMD increased yearly for 7 years. Among 87 patients with baseline L-T-scores ≤ -2.5, better baseline L-T-scores predicted achievement of L-T-scores > -2.5 at month 36. The cut-off value for baseline L-T-score was -3.4. Among 76 patients with baseline FN-T-scores ≤ -2.5, better baseline FN-T-scores predicted achievement of FN-T-scores > -2.5 at month 36. The cut-off value for baseline FN-T-scores was -2.8. Conclusions Long-term treatment with denosumab was effective in PMO patients. As better baseline T-score predicted achievement of T-scores > -2.5, early initiation of treatment will contribute to better outcome.

Running interferon interference in treating PV/ET: meeting unmet needs

Enthusiasm about interferons for the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms has recently arisen. How does a nontargeted therapy selectively target the malignant clone? Many foundational questions about interferon treatment are unanswered, including who, when, and for how long do we treat. Using an individual case, this review touches on gaps in risk assessment in polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) and the history of treatment with interferons. How is it that this proinflammatory cytokine effectively treats ET and PV, themselves proinflammatory states? We summarize existing mechanistic and clinical data, the molecular context as a modifier for treatment response, the establishment of treatment goals, and the challenges that lie ahead.

Comparison of Treatment Goals between Users of Biological and Non-Biological Therapies for Treatment of Psoriasis in Japan

Background: Previously, our cross-sectional observational study in Japan revealed high (68%) discordance within treatment goals between psoriasis patients and their physicians. Objective: This secondary analysis aimed to determine whether patient and physician users of biologics have higher treatment goals than users of non-biologics. Methods: A survey for both patients and physicians on background characteristics, disease severity, treatment goals, treatment satisfaction, and health-related quality of life was conducted at 54 sites. Association between treatment goals and biologic/non-biologic users was assessed using ordinal logistic regression models. Results: In total, 449 patient-physician pairs agreed to participate; 425 completed the survey and were analyzed. More biologic users than non-biologic users reported complete clearance (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 100) as a treatment goal (patient-reported: 23.6% vs. 16.1%; physician-reported: 26.9% vs. 2.2%). Biologic users were significantly associated with higher treatment goals than non-biologic users (patient-reported: 1.8 (1.15–2.87) (odds ratio (9 5% CI)), p = 0.01; physician-reported: 11.0 (5.72–21.01), p < 0.01). Among biologic users, higher treatment goals were associated with higher treatment satisfaction (patient- and physician-rated); lower treatment goals were associated with back lesions and increasing patient age (patient-rated) and higher disease severity (physician-rated). Conclusion: Use of biologics among patients with psoriasis was associated with higher treatment goals. Further use of biologics contributed to treatment satisfaction. Appropriate treatment goals that are shared among patients and their physicians may improve treatment outcomes.