Avoidable Blood Loss in Critical Care and Patient Blood Management: Scoping Review of Diagnostic Blood Loss

Background: Anemia remains one of the most common comorbidities in intensive care patients worldwide. The cause of anemia is often multifactorial and triggered by underlying disease, comorbidities, and iatrogenic factors, such as diagnostic phlebotomies. As anemia is associated with a worse outcome, especially in intensive care patients, unnecessary iatrogenic blood loss must be avoided. Therefore, this scoping review addresses the amount of blood loss during routine phlebotomies in adult (>17 years) intensive care patients and whether there are factors that need to be improved in terms of patient blood management (PBM). Methods: A systematic search of the Medline Database via PubMed was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. The reported daily blood volume for diagnostics and other relevant information from eligible studies were charted. Results: A total of 2167 studies were identified in our search, of which 38 studies met the inclusion criteria (9 interventional studies and 29 observational studies). The majority of the studies were conducted in the US (37%) and Canada (13%). An increasing interest to reduce iatrogenic blood loss has been observed since 2015. Phlebotomized blood volume per patient per day was up to 377 mL. All interventional trials showed that the use of pediatric-sized blood collection tubes can significantly reduce the daily amount of blood drawn. Conclusion: Iatrogenic blood loss for diagnostic purposes contributes significantly to the development and exacerbation of hospital-acquired anemia. Therefore, a comprehensive PBM in intensive care is urgently needed to reduce avoidable blood loss, including blood-sparing techniques, regular advanced training, and small-volume blood collection tubes.

Blood Transfusion Has An Adverse Impact On The Prognosis of Patients Receiving Chemotherapy For Advanced Colorectal Cancer: Experience From a Single Institution With a Patient Blood Management Program

Purpose: Perioperative blood transfusion in early stage cancer patients had a negative effect on the prognosis of patients, but the prognostic impact of transfusion in advanced cancer patients remains unclear. To minimize transfusion, a institutional patient blood management (PBM) program was launched, and we evaluated the new program has changed practice and impacted on prognosis of advanced cancer patients. Methods: We investigated the medical records of colorectal cancer patients who received chemotherapy from 2015 to 2020. The amount and frequency of transfusion, iron replacement and laboratory findings, and overall survival were compared before and after implementation of PBM. Results: The rate of transfusion in colorectal cancer patients was significantly decreased from 23.5/100 person-quarter in 2015 to 1.2/100 person-quarter in 2020, but iron supplementation therapy was frequently used and the proportion of patients who received transfusion under haemoglobin 7 g/dL significantly increased from 15.9% in 2015 to 55.3% in 2020. Multivariate analysis revealed that transfusion was a significant risk factor affecting the overall survival of patients (HR 2.70, 95% CI: 1.93–3.78, p<0.001). Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed that overall survival was significantly longer in non-transfused patients than in transfused patients (11.0 versus 22.4 months; HR 0.69, 95% CI: 0.56–0.86, p<0.001). Conclusions: This study shows that minimized transfusion through an institutional PBM can positively affect the prognosis of patients who are receiving chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer.

Evaluating the Importance of Patient Blood Management During COVID-19 Pandemic

: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the demand for blood products may decrease as the health care system shifts toward treating the increased number of patients afflicted with COVID-19 and delaying selective surgeries and emergency procedures. One of the most important problems for blood transfusion services during COVID-19 pandemic is the reduction in the number of donors and a decrease in blood stocks. This happens due to the limitations of attendance of donors in blood centers, lack of awareness, misinformation, fear of being infected while donating blood, and restricting the freedom of blood collection teams to attend public places. Blood transfusion services should be prepared and well-responded in a timely manner. In this regard, appropriate use of blood, diminishing unnecessary transfusions, and implementation of patient blood management (PBM) principles are considered as significant measurements. PBM can help maintain blood supply throughout the crisis and reduce the pressure on blood demand. As a result, blood products can be saved for patients who need it urgently. PBM focuses on the patient, as well as the conditions that make patients transfuse blood, such as blood loss, coagulopathy, platelet dysfunction, and anemia. Thus, the majority of health systems in different countries have made recommendations to the PBM in hospitals.

Biomedical Ethics for Jehovah’s Witnesses and Patient Blood Management

Jehovah’s Witnesses refuse blood transfusions according to religious beliefs, and for this reason, most hospitals and doctors have refused their treatment. There are more than 100,000 religious people in Korea, but there are few bloodless centers that can receive their treatment. So, the number of Jehovah’s Witnesses patients visiting bloodless centers in Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital has been increasing every year. Despite this situation, no legal or medical countermeasure has yet been proposed against them. Therefore, I would like to take a bioethical approach based on “principles of biomedical ethics” and introduce “patient blood management” which is currently spreading in advanced medical countries.

Comparison of the effectiveness of blood transfusion and reinfusion

Studies by atomic force and scanning electron microscopy have shown that erythrocytes of foreign blood have morphological defects. The sequestration of foreign erythrocytes makes it difficult for the erythron to selfrepair. The actual solution to this problem is the application of the blood reinfusion technique using the Cell Saver apparatus. Transfusion of autoerythra suspension, harvested using the Cell Saver apparatus during the operation, stabilizes red blood counts in the early post-transfusion period in patients and reduces the manifestation of massive hemotransfusion syndrome. Hardware reinfusion of erythrocytes is effective and safe for massive blood loss in obstetrics. Reinfusion dictates the need for parallel correction of all blood parameters. Application of the principles of patient blood management can reduce the transfusion load, improve the quality of medical care.

Focused educational intervention improves intern knowledge of perioperative patient blood management principles

A perioperative patient blood management (PBM) educational intervention was implemented for first year postgraduate doctors (interns) at the Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital (RBWH) following identification of a perioperative PBM training requirement. This quality improvement activity evaluated the effectiveness of this educational intervention in improving intern knowledge of perioperative PBM principles.A 15-question perioperative PBM focused multiple choice questionnaire developed from information attained from comprehensive, evidence and consensus-based guidelines regarding PBM practice was distributed to interns immediately before a compulsory perioperative PBM educational intervention and then again 5 weeks later. The perioperative PBM educational intervention was delivered every 10 weeks (five interventions in total) to a different group of interns each time. Statistical analysis determined significance between mean questionnaire score before and after the intervention.The mean pre-intervention score for correctly answered questions was 7/15 (SD 2.73) and mean post-intervention score was 9/15 (SD 2.99) (p=0.02). Categorisation of questions into core domains of perioperative PBM demonstrated intern scores for correctly answered questions improved in all domains following the educational intervention.Perioperative PBM education delivered through a dedicated intervention aimed to improve knowledge is associated with objective evidence of educational benefits for interns at RBWH. It is an effective strategy to enact PBM governance and bestow clinical guideline knowledge. This is important given the global health sector’s challenge to improve patient outcomes despite increasingly restricted funding and pressure on doctors to devote more time to service and less to teaching.