Case Study - Candida auris in Skilled Nursing Facility

Candida Auris (C. auris), is a multidrug-resistant organism, first described in Japan 2009, and now a serious, emerging global health threat1. C. auris pathogen can potentiate morbidity and mortality, i.e. lifelong contact precaution isolation, intravenous antifungal treatment, hospitalization and mortality rate of 30-60%1. Los Angeles County (LAC) developed 15 new cases in May 2020, and 73 cases in July 2020, amidst COVID-19 pandemic2. A 88 year old Black female had a positive skin test for C. auris by LAC Department of Public Health (DPH) during skilled nursing facility (SNF) admission for hip fracture in September 2020. Patient’s risk factors for C. auris included: age, kidney transplantation (1998) immunosuppression on tacrolimus, fungal infection on fluconazole, drug-drug interaction between tacrolimus-fluconazole including nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity, malnutrition, bedbound, Stage 4 sacrococcyx pressure ulcer, osteomyelitis on broad-spectrum antibiotics, chronic indwelling catheter, and healthcare setting. Our multimorbid and frail patient remained asymptomatic with C. auris under an interdisciplinary team approach, including geriatricians, infectious disease, pharmacists, SNF team and local DPH. Our patient’s psychosocial isolation and family distress with local DPH guidelines for COVID-19 SNF visitation restrictions were compounded by multifaceted coordination of patient-centered care between SNF team and specialists via telehealth. Further research in the prevention, detection, and management of C. auris is warranted to protect our vulnerable SNF residents. 1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020). Tracking Candida auris. https://www.cdc.gov/fungal/candida-auris/tracking-c-auris.html 2. Los Angeles County Health Alert Network. (2020). CDPH Health Advisory: Resurgence of Candida auris in Healthcare Facilities in the Setting of COVID-19. http://publichealth.lacounty.gov/eprp/lahan/alerts/CAHANCauris082020.pdf

SARS-CoV-2 vs. Hepatitis Virus Infection Risk in the Hemodialysis Population: What Should We Expect?

Since the dramatic rise of the coronavirus infection disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, patients receiving dialysis have emerged as especially susceptible to this infection because of their impaired immunologic state, chronic inflammation and the high incidence of comorbidities. Although several strategies have thus been implemented to minimize the risk of transmission and acquisition in this population worldwide, the reported severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) seroprevalence varies across studies but is higher than in the general population. On the contrary, the screening for hepatitis viruses (HBV and HCV) has seen significant improvements in recent years, with vaccination in the case of HBV and effective viral infection treatment for HCV. In this sense, a universal SARS-CoV-2 screening and contact precaution appear to be effective in preventing further transmission. Finally, regarding the progress, an international consensus with updated protocols that prioritize between old and new indicators would seem a reasonable tool to address these unexpended changes for the nephrology community.

Comparing intervention strategies for reducing Clostridioides difficile transmission in acute healthcare settings: an agent-based modeling study

Background Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is one of the most common healthcare infections. Common strategies aiming at controlling CDI include antibiotic stewardship, environmental decontamination, and improved hand hygiene and contact precautions. Mathematical models provide a framework to evaluate control strategies. Our objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of control strategies in decreasing C. difficile colonization and infection using an agent-based model in an acute healthcare setting. Methods We developed an agent-based model that simulates the transmission of C. difficile in medical wards. This model explicitly incorporates healthcare workers (HCWs) as vectors of transmission, tracks individual patient antibiotic histories, incorporates varying risk levels of antibiotics with respect to CDI susceptibility, and tracks contamination levels of ward rooms by C. difficile. Interventions include two forms of antimicrobial stewardship, increased environmental decontamination through room cleaning, improved HCW compliance, and a preliminary assessment of vaccination. Results Increased HCW compliance with CDI patients was ranked as the most effective intervention in decreasing colonizations, with reductions up to 56%. Antibiotic stewardship practices were highly ranked after contact precaution compliance. Vaccination and reduction of high-risk antibiotics were the most effective intervention in decreasing CDI. Vaccination reduced CDI cases to up to 90%, and the reduction of high-risk antibiotics decreased CDI cases up to 23%. Conclusions Overall, interventions that decrease patient susceptibility to colonization by C. difficile, such as antibiotic stewardship, were the most effective interventions in reducing both colonizations and CDI cases.

Perioperative Bacterial Contamination from Patients on Contact Precaution in Operating Room Environment

We investigated the microbial burden on the operating room environment when patients on contact precautions for a multidrug-resistant pathogen received surgery. Our study demonstrated that the perioperative environment was contaminated with aerobic bacteria and MRSA after surgery, and that MRSA persisted environmentally even after cleaning/disinfection, highlighting the need for meticulous cleaning/disinfection in the perioperative environment.

Perioperative Microbial Contamination From Patients on Contact Precaution in Operating Room Environment

Background: The contaminated healthcare environment, including operating rooms (ORs), can serve as an important role in transmission of healthcare-associated pathogens. Studies are very limited regarding the level of contamination of ORs during the surgery of a patient on contact precautions and the risk to the next surgery patient after standard room cleaning and disinfection. Objective: Here, we investigated the microbial burden on the OR environment when patients on contact precautions receive surgery, and we assessed the impact of cleaning and disinfection on the contamination of OR environmental sites. Methods: This investigation was conducted in the ORs of an academic facility during an 8-month period. It involved 10 patients on contact precautions for multidrug-resistant pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA; n = 7); carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) plus MRSA (n = 2); and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) plus MRSA (n = 1), who underwent surgery. Environmental sampling was performed at the following time points: (1) immediately before the surgical patient’s arrival in the OR, (2) after surgery but before the OR cleaning and disinfection, and (3) after the OR cleaning and disinfection. In total, 1,520 environmental samples collected from 15 OR sites for 10 surgical patients at 3 time points were analyzed. Relatedness among environmental MRSA isolates was determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Results: Overall, the mean CFUs of aerobes per Rodac plate (CFU/25 cm2) were 10.1 before patient arrival, 14.7 before cleaning and disinfection, and 6.3 after cleaning and disinfection (P < .0001, after cleaning and disinfection vs before cleaning and disinfection). Moreover, 7 environmental sites (46.7%) after cleaning and disinfection, including bed, arm rest, pyxis counter, floor (near, door side), floor (far, by door), steel counter (small, near bed), and small computer desk, had significantly lower mean counts of aerobes than before patient arrival or before cleaning and disinfection (Fig. 1). The mean CFUs of MRSA per Rodac plate (CFU/25 cm2) were 0.04 before patient arrival, 0.66 before cleaning and disinfection, and 0.08 after cleaning and disinfection (P = .0006, after cleaning and disinfection vs before cleaning and disinfection). Of environmental sites where MRSA was identified, 87.2% were on floors (41 of 47) and 19.1% were after cleaning and disinfection (9 of 47, 8 from floors and 1 from pyxis touchscreen). The A2/B2 MRSA strain was identified on different environmental sites (eg, floor, computer desk, counter) in various rooms (eg, OR2, OR10, and OR16), even after cleaning and disinfection (Fig. 2). Conclusions: Our study has demonstrated that the OR environment was contaminated with aerobic bacteria and MRSA after surgery and that MRSA persisted in the environment even after cleaning and disinfection. Enhanced environmental cleaning in the perioperative environment used for patients on isolation is necessary to prevent transmission of healthcare-associated pathogens in ORs.Funding: NoneDisclosures: Drs. Rutala and Weber are consultants to PDI (Professional Disposable International)

857. Contact Precautions as a Barrier to Hand Hygiene: PDSA to Improve Compliance with Gloved Hand Hygiene

Background Full compliance with personal protective equipment (PPE) is challenging, with multiple barriers noted: adherence to appropriate PPE, lack of knowledge of appropriate PPE, added time to workflow, and appropriate donning/doffing techniques of PPE to avoid self-contamination. Recent studies note that nurses tend to batch care to achieve more while in the room. A hand hygiene technology system alerted MRICU nurses to difficulties performing WHO’s Five Moments of hand hygiene (HH) when in contact precaution PPE. Methods We implemented the ‘Plan-Do-Study-Act’ (PDSA) framework to address the MRICU team concerns. Six nurses were directly observed while providing bedside care to understand nursing workflow and barriers to HH while in contact precautions. Results All 6 nurses performed hand hygiene prior to entering the room and at the time of exiting the room. Once donning contact precautions, they had variable but low compliance with any additional HH opportunities. The average missed opportunities per encounter was 5.2 (range: 2-11). Moments that would require hand washing or sanitizer if nurse were not gloved were not met with changing gloves. An average of 9.8 tasks were achieved in each room (range: 3-18). On average, each visit was 16 (range: 4-30 minutes) minutes long. Conclusion There is significant opportunity for improved HH while in PPE. Nurses may be more aware of the “Five moments” when not wearing gloves in contact precaution rooms, but lose the trigger once the gloves are on in the contact precaution rooms. An education campaign to improve hand sanitizer usage with gloves is the next step in this PDSA. More prominent placement of glove boxes in the rooms will also serve as a trigger to remind nurses to change gloves after certain tasks. Limitations of this PDSA cycle include Hawthorne effect of the nurses knowing they were observed and potentially changing their workflow. We also only observed morning workflow; nurses on different shifts may have different workflow. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Healthcare Worker Experiences Implementing CRE Infection Control Measures at a vSNF—A Qualitative Analysis

Background: During 2017–2019 in the Chicago region, several ventilator-capable skilled nursing facilities (vSNFs) participated in a quality improvement project to control the spread of highly prevalent carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). With guidance from regional project coordinators and public health departments that involved education, assistance with implementation, and adherence monitoring, the facilities implemented a CRE prevention bundle that included a hand hygiene campaign that promoted alcohol-based hand rub, contact precautions (personal protective equipment with glove/gown) for care of CRE-colonized residents, and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) wipes for routine resident bathing. We conducted a qualitative study to better understand the ways that vSNF employees engage with the implementation of such infection control measures. Methods: A PhD-candidate medical anthropologist conducted semistructured interviews with management (N = 5), nursing staff (N = 6), and certified nursing assistants (N = 6) at a vSNF in the Chicago region (Illinois) between September 2018 and November 2018. More than 11 hours of semistructured interviews were collected and transcribed. Data collection and analysis focused on identifying healthcare worker experiences during an infection control intervention. Transcriptions of the data were analyzed using thematic coding aided by MAXQDA qualitative analysis software. Results: Healthcare workers described the facility using language associated with a family environment (Table 1). Furthermore, healthcare workers demonstrated motivation to implement infection control policies (Table 2). However, healthcare workers expressed cultural and structural challenges encountered during implementation, such as their belief that some infection control measures discouraged maintenance of a home-like environment, lack of time, and understaffing. Some healthcare workers perceived that alcohol-based hand rub was ineffective over time and left unpleasant textures on the skin. Additionally, some workers did not trust the available gown and gloves used to prevent transmission. Lastly, healthcare workers typically did not prefer 2% CHG wipes over soap and water, citing residual resident postbathing smell as one indicator of CHG ineffectiveness. Conclusions: In a vSNF we found both considerable support and challenges implementing a CRE prevention bundle from the healthcare worker perspective. Healthcare workers were dedicated to recreating a home-like environment for their residents, which sometimes felt at odds with infection control interventions. Residual misconceptions (eg, alcohol-based hand rub is not effective) and negative worker perceptions (eg, permeability of contact precaution gowns and/or residue from alcohol-based hand rub) suggest that ongoing education and participation by healthcare workers in evaluating infection control products for interventions is critical.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

Clostridium difficile Infection Prevention Bundle Implementation

Background: The optimal prevention of healthcare onset Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has been a challenging one in an acute tertiary-care hospital with limited number of single rooms. Asymptomatic patients with CDI are nursed in open wards but tagged with a green sticker to alert staff of their status. This signal prompts cleaning staff to use 5,000 ppm sodium hypochlorite to clean environmental surfaces in the multibed room and to continue with modified contact precautions. Methods: We conducted a survey on infection prevention measures used in the management of CDI patients over 2 weeks among senior nurse managers, clinicians, and registered nurses in 38 inpatient wards. We categorized the survey results into 4 types of practices: established practices, nonestablished practices (easy implementation), nonestablished practices (lack of resources), and nonestablished practices (staff resistance). We then identified barriers to determine reasons for resistance to nonestablished practices before the implementation of the CDI bundle in May 2019. The bundle comprised the following components: contact precautions, antimicrobial stewardship, isolation of CDI patient with diarrhea in single room, environment, and equipment hygiene. Following the survey, we enhanced the signage for CDI patients to be more obvious. Monthly, we monitored the incidence of HO-Clostridium difficile to assess effectiveness of implementation measures. Results: Nonestablished practices (easy implementation) included uncertainty of diarrhea definition and the recommended environmental hygiene disinfectant, lack of understanding of the importance of complying to personal protective equipment (PPE), and inconsistency in conveying CDI status. Among nonestablished practices (lack of resources), shortage of isolation beds for CDI patients with diarrhea and unavailability of electronic alert system for CDI patients within the institution are the major issues faced by clinical staff. Unavailability of CDI indicator stickers, contact precaution posters, and sporicidal wipes were noted in 6 medical and surgical wards. Nonestablished practices (staff resistance) were related to the time taken to don full PPE and reluctance to arrange for an isolation bed due to increased workload and unavailability of isolation beds. A shift was noted in the control chart for HO-Clostridium difficile after the implementation of the CDI bundle in May 2019. Conclusions: The categorization of practices into established and nonestablished practices can help to identify barriers that may interfere with successful implementation of an infection prevention bundle.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

Effects of Discontinuing Contact Precaution on Control of Extended-Spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae Nosocomial Acquisition: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis

Background: Interest of contact precautions (CP) to prevent cross-transmission in addition to standard precautions (SP) is actually debated in the literature for some microorganisms, like extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBLE). We took advantage of the decision to stop CP for ESBLE in our hospital to study in real life if this discontinuing has an impact on the ESBLE acquisition rate. Methods: An interrupted time series (ITS) was performed in 3 wards and the week was used as the temporal unit. The ESBLE acquisition and importation incidence density (ID) and potential risks factors (colonization and selective pressure, Alcohol-Based hand rub solution consumption rates, demographic patients data) were collected between two periods: the pre-intervention (July 2018 to June 2019) when patients infected or colonized by ESBLE were cared with PC and SP and the post-intervention (September 2019 to March 2020) when patients were cared with SP only. Results: ESBLE acquisition ID were of 1.32 ± 1.36 and 1.17 ± 1.25 cases per 1000 patient-days for the pre- and post-intervention period respectively with no significant change in slope (p = 0.15). The only confounding variable significant (p = 0.04) in ITS was the antibiotics consumption, with a positive increasing trend. Conclusion: This study showed that the SP alone in order to control the ESBLE nosocomial did not lead to increasing the ESBLE nosocomial cross-transmission.

The Effect of Infection Precautions on Colonization of Nursing Staff with Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase Producing Enterobacteriaceae in Three Beirut Hospitals

Background: ESBL-PE are emerging worldwide. This study assesses the effect of contact precaution (CP) on ESBL-PE-colonization rates among nurses in 3 hospitals in Beirut, where ESBL is endemic, to define risk factors for colonization, and evaluate the ongoing use of CP to prevent ESBL-PE transmission to healthy nurses. Methods: Cross-sectional, non-randomized study completed in three hospitals. Hospital 1 required CP, Hospital 2 recently stopped CP, and Hospital 3 had stopped it 3 years previously. Questionnaires and stool-collection containers were distributed to all patient care nurses in those 3 hospitals. Returned samples were tested using agar dilution technique. Results: 269 of 733 nurses volunteered; 140 met inclusion criteria (no recent hospitalization, antibiotic use, known ESBL-PE colonization). 15% were ESBL-positive. Compared to nurses from Hospital 3, nurses from Hospital 1 were 59% less likely to be colonized, while nurses from Hospital 2 were 62% more likely to be colonized. Discussion: In hospitals where CP is ongoing for ESBL-positive patients, transmission to nursing staff was reduced. Additionally, a work experience of 2-4 years increased the odds of ESBL-PE colonization in comparison with longer nursing experience. HIGHLIGHTS : • We examined the impact of contact precautions (CP) for Extended spectrum beta-lactamase- producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE) colonized patients on rates of ESBL-PE colonization in nursing staff. • We found significantly decreased rates of colonization in nurses from a hospital utilizing CP, and significantly increased rates of colonization among nurses from a hospital that recently • discontinued CP, compared with nurses from a hospital that had discontinued CP 3 years previously. • Findings suggest that contact precaution may be required to prevent ESBL-PE transmission from patients to nursing staff.