scholarly journals Evaluation and Acceptance of an Electric Toothbrush Designed for Dependent Patients

Cureus ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Virginia Prendergast ◽  
Kristina M Chapple
Keyword(s):  
Electric Toothbrush

scholarly journals Plaque removal by manual and electric toothbrushing among children

2001 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 296-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolina Covolo da COSTA ◽  
Luiz Cesar da COSTA FILHO ◽  
Marina Lara SÓRIA ◽  
Ana Paula Rorato MAINARDI
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Analysis ◽  
Primary Dentition ◽  
The Other ◽  
Mixed Dentition ◽  
Plaque Removal ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Electric Toothbrush ◽  
Plaque Control ◽  
First Session

The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of plaque control performed with electric and manual toothbrushes. Fifteen children with primary dentition and 14 children with mixed dentition were divided in two groups and randomly assigned to utilize a manual or an electric toothbrush. In the first session, professional plaque removal was performed, and the children spent 24 hours without brushing their teeth. In the second session, plaque was disclosed and assessed on all facial and lingual surfaces. After that, all children brushed their teeth with the predetermined toothbrush. The next procedure was the disclosure and measurement of residual plaque. After a period of 7 days, the children switched the kind of toothbrush, and the same procedures were repeated. According to the statistical analysis of the results, there were no significant differences concerning plaque removal when the toothbrushes were utilized by children with mixed dentition. On the other hand, the electric toothbrush promoted significantly greater plaque removal on the lingual surfaces of teeth from children with primary dentition.

scholarly journals A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the plaque removal efficacy of an oscillating-rotating toothbrush versus a sonic toothbrush in orthodontic patients using digital imaging analysis of the anterior dentition

2018 ◽  
Vol 89 (3) ◽  
pp. 385-390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Erbe ◽  
Collin Jacobs ◽  
Malgorzata Klukowska ◽  
Hans Timm ◽  
Julie Grender ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Orthodontic Appliances ◽  
Imaging Analysis ◽  
Plaque Score ◽  
Plaque Removal ◽  
Fixed Orthodontic Appliances ◽  
Adolescent Patients ◽  
Orthodontic Patients ◽  
Single Use ◽  
Electric Toothbrush

ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the plaque removal efficacy of an oscillating-rotating electric toothbrush with an orthodontic brush head versus a sonic toothbrush in adolescent patients with fixed orthodontic appliances. Materials and Methods: This was a randomized, examiner-blind, replicate single-use, two-treatment, four-period, crossover study with a washout period between visits of approximately 24 hours. Forty-four adolescent patients with fixed orthodontic appliances in both arches were randomized based on a computer-generated randomization schedule to one of four toothbrush treatment sequences. The primary outcome was plaque score change from baseline, measured using digital plaque imaging analysis. Results: Baseline plaque levels for both brush treatments were high, covering more than 50% of the tooth area. Effective plaque removal was observed with both brush treatments (P < .001); however, the reduction in plaque with the oscillating-rotating toothbrush was statistically significantly greater (P = .017) compared with the sonic toothbrush. Conclusions: The study provides evidence for more effective plaque-removing efficacy of the oscillating-rotating toothbrush versus the sonic toothbrush among orthodontic patients.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of the Use of Manual and Electric Toothbrushes and the Effect of Educational Brushing Teeth with Video Animation on OHI-S Children with Down syndrome

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 6
Author(s):  
Alivy Aulia Az Zahra ◽  
Natasha Winona Audrey ◽  
Devalna Siwi Ichyana ◽  
Tania Saskianti ◽  
Seno Pradopo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Tooth Brushing ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Manual Toothbrush ◽  
Electric Toothbrush ◽  
And Control ◽  
Control Purpose

Background: Down Syndrome children have better ability in capturing instructions visually. The audio-visual learning method can be applied to Down Syndrome children. Electric toothbrushes were made to make it easier for them to brush their teeth, besides those electric toothbrushes have a handle that is comfortable to hold and control. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of electric and manual toothbrushes on Down Syndrome children OHI-S scores and determine the effect of education on tooth brushing with animated videos on Down Syndrome children OHI-S scores. Methods: Subjects of the study were 34 Down Syndrome children aged 6-19 years in Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia. OHI-S scores were recorded before and after the subjects were educated to brush their teeth with animated videos or dental phantoms. OHI-S scores were also recorded before and after the subjects brushed their teeth using manual toothbrushes or electric toothbrushes. Results: The test results Independent T-test (p> 0.05) showed there was no significant difference between tooth brushing using a manual toothbrush and an electric toothbrush to the decline of OHI-S score of Down Syndrome children. The results of the Mann-Whitney statistical test were p> 0.05, that there was no significant difference in the reduction in OHI-S scores between Down Syndrome children who were educated with animated videos and dental phantoms. Conclusion: There was no significant difference between manual toothbrushes and electric toothbrushes and there was no significant influence of Down Syndrome OHI-S children who were educated with animated videos or dental phantoms.

scholarly journals Treatment Success and User-Friendliness of An Electric Toothbrush App: A Pilot Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 97
Author(s):  
Viviane Humm ◽  
Daniel Wiedemeier ◽  
Thomas Attin ◽  
Patrick Schmidlin ◽  
Stefanie Gartenmann
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Treatment Success ◽  
Test Group ◽  
Plaque Index ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
User Friendliness ◽  
Short Period ◽  
Electric Toothbrush ◽  
And Control

Electronic and mobile health (eHealth/mHealth) are rapidly growing areas in medicine and digital technologies are gaining importance. In dentistry, digitalization is also an emerging topic, whereby more and more applications are being offered. As an example, using real-time feedback, digital application software (an app) was designed to help users brush their teeth more accurately. However, there is no data on the effectiveness and haptic of such apps. Therefore, a single-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial was designed: twenty volunteers received an electric toothbrush with an associated app to assess whether the app-assisted toothbrushing is better than without. After a short period of familiarization with the electric toothbrush, plaque index (O‘Leary et al. 1972) was recorded and subjects were assigned to the test (with app; n = 10) or the control group (no app; n = 10). At the end of the 2-week pilot study period, plaque was again assessed and participants in the test group completed a questionnaire about the app’s user-friendliness. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences between the test and control groups. The plaque index improved on average by 8.5% points in the test and 4.7% points in the control group. Fifty percent of the test group participants were of the opinion that they had achieved better cleaning results and would recommend the app to others, although the app contributed only marginally to increased plaque removal. However, such apps may nevertheless be helpful as motivational tools, especially when tracking and monitoring cleaning data. Therefore, more development and research on this topic is indicated.

scholarly journals Effect of instruction and motivation in the use of electric and manual toothbrushes in periodontal patients: a comparative study

2004 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 296-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tove Roscher ◽  
Cassiano Kuchenbecker Rösing ◽  
Per Gjermo ◽  
Anne Merete Aass
Keyword(s):  
T Test ◽  
Professional Advice ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Alpha Level ◽  
Manual Toothbrush ◽  
Electric Toothbrush ◽  
Plaque Control ◽  
Second Period ◽  
Paired T Test ◽  
Group Comparisons

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of manual and electric toothbrushes in plaque control in periodontal patients after proper instructions. Thirty six periodontal patients (mean age of 49 years, 21 females and 15 males) were included and completed the study (100% compliance). A single-blinded, randomized, controlled, cross-over clinical design was adopted, with the patients using during 2 periods of 14 days each the manual and/or electric toothbrush. Four subgroups of 9 individuals were studied: A1 - used manual toothbrush in both experimental periods; A2 - used the manual toothbrush during the first period and the electrical toothbrush during the second period; B1 - used electrical toothbrush during both periods; B2 - used the electrical toothbrush in the first period and the manual one in the second period. Brushing was performed during 14 days and at day 14 and 28 it was performed in the clinic, and timing of brushing was recorded without patients being aware. The Plaque Index (Silness, Löe, 1964) was used. Intra-group comparisons were performed by paired t-test and inter-group comparisons by independent sample t-test, with an alpha level of 0.05. The results showed no difference between the tested brushes neither for plaque nor for timing. However, re-instruction was detected as an important factor, since for all groups the second period, after reinstruction, showed lower plaque scores. It is concluded that professional advice and instruction and re-instruction seem more important in order to obtain good plaque control than the choice of toothbrush in subjects with periodontal disease.

scholarly journals Efficacy of a U-Shaped Automatic Electric Toothbrush in Dental Plaque Removal: A Cross-Over Randomized Controlled Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (13) ◽  
pp. 4649
Author(s):  
Michele Nieri ◽  
Veronica Giuntini ◽  
Umberto Pagliaro ◽  
Monica Giani ◽  
Lorenzo Franchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Dental Plaque ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Outcome Variable ◽  
Plaque Score ◽  
Plaque Removal ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Electric Toothbrush

Background: The aim of this single-use, four-treatment, four-period (visit), cross-over, mono-centered, examiner-blind, cross-over randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to evaluate the efficacy in dental plaque removal of a U-shaped automatic electric toothbrush (U) compared to a conventional powered toothbrush (P), a habitual toothbrushing procedure (H), and no brushing (N). Methods: Eligible participants were volunteer students. Primary outcome measure was the reduction in full-mouth plaque score (FMPS) after brushing. The secondary outcome variable was a visual analogic scale (VAS) on subjective clean mouth sensation. Mixed models were performed for difference in FMPS and VAS. Results: Twenty-two participants were randomized to the treatments in the four periods of the study. The differences between treatments in FMPS reduction after brushing were statistically significant (p < 0.0001). The differences were statistically significant between the U and P groups (difference −48; 95% CI from −54 to −41) favoring the P group, and between the U and H groups (difference −45; 95% CI from −52 to −39) favoring the H group. On the contrary, the difference between the U and N groups was not significant (difference 5; 95% CI from −2 to 12) favoring the U group. The differences between treatments in clean mouth VAS was statistically significant (p < 0.0001) favoring the P and H groups. Conclusions: The U-shaped automatic electric toothbrush tested in this study proved to be not effective in removing dental plaque.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document