scholarly journals A protocol for a systematic review into consumers’ attitudes, beliefs and perceived ethical obligations towards farm animal welfare

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beth Clark ◽  
Gavin B Stewart ◽  
Luca A Panzone ◽  
Lynn J Frewer
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Animal Welfare ◽  
Animal Species ◽  
Reasoned Action ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Farm Animal ◽  
Farm Animal Welfare ◽  
Data Synthesis ◽  
Ethical Obligations

This article outlines a protocol for a systematic review into consumer attitudes, beliefs and perceived ethical obligations towards farm animal welfare, utilizing both the Theory of Reasoned Action and the Theory of Planned Behavior. A number of secondary objectives will also be explored in relation to the heterogeneity within the data relating to a number of variables known to vary within existing data including; animal species, welfare measures, socio-demographic and socio-economic characteristics. The protocol outlines the rationale, objectives, inclusion criteria, search strategy and screening processes for the meta-analysis, and the plans for data extraction, risk of bias and data synthesis.

scholarly journals A protocol for a systematic review into consumers’ attitudes, beliefs and perceived ethical obligations towards farm animal welfare

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beth Clark ◽  
Gavin B Stewart ◽  
Luca A Panzone ◽  
Lynn J Frewer
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Animal Welfare ◽  
Animal Species ◽  
Reasoned Action ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Farm Animal ◽  
Farm Animal Welfare ◽  
Data Synthesis ◽  
Ethical Obligations

This article outlines a protocol for a systematic review into consumer attitudes, beliefs and perceived ethical obligations towards farm animal welfare, utilizing both the Theory of Reasoned Action and the Theory of Planned Behavior. A number of secondary objectives will also be explored in relation to the heterogeneity within the data relating to a number of variables known to vary within existing data including; animal species, welfare measures, socio-demographic and socio-economic characteristics. The protocol outlines the rationale, objectives, inclusion criteria, search strategy and screening processes for the meta-analysis, and the plans for data extraction, risk of bias and data synthesis.

scholarly journals A protocol for a meta-analysis of consumers’ and citizens willingness-to-pay for farm animal welfare and disease prevention

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beth Clark ◽  
Gavin B Stewart ◽  
Luca A Panzone ◽  
Lynn J Frewer
Keyword(s):  
Willingness To Pay ◽  
Animal Welfare ◽  
Animal Species ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Farm Animal ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Farm Animal Welfare ◽  
Niche Markets ◽  
Data Synthesis

This article outlines a protocol for a meta-analysis into willingness-to-pay (WTP) for farm animal welfare. The analysis seeks to establish the public's WTP for farm animal welfare and whether there is evidence to support niche markets for products produced to designated and usually higher welfare standards. A number of secondary objectives will also be explored in relation to the heterogeneity within the data relating to a number of variables known to vary within existing data including; animal species, welfare measures, socio-demographic and socio-economic characteristics. The protocol outlines the rationale, objectives, inclusion criteria, search strategy and screening processes for the meta-analysis, and the plans for data extraction, risk of bias and data synthesis.

scholarly journals A protocol for a meta-analysis of consumers’ and citizens willingness-to-pay for farm animal welfare and disease prevention

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beth Clark ◽  
Gavin B Stewart ◽  
Luca A Panzone ◽  
Lynn J Frewer
Keyword(s):  
Willingness To Pay ◽  
Animal Welfare ◽  
Animal Species ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Farm Animal ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Farm Animal Welfare ◽  
Niche Markets ◽  
Data Synthesis

This article outlines a protocol for a meta-analysis into willingness-to-pay (WTP) for farm animal welfare. The analysis seeks to establish the public's WTP for farm animal welfare and whether there is evidence to support niche markets for products produced to designated and usually higher welfare standards. A number of secondary objectives will also be explored in relation to the heterogeneity within the data relating to a number of variables known to vary within existing data including; animal species, welfare measures, socio-demographic and socio-economic characteristics. The protocol outlines the rationale, objectives, inclusion criteria, search strategy and screening processes for the meta-analysis, and the plans for data extraction, risk of bias and data synthesis.

scholarly journals Factors that Influence Farmers’ Views on Farm Animal Welfare: A Semi-Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis

Animals ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 1524
Author(s):  
Agnese Balzani ◽  
Alison Hanlon
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Animal Welfare ◽  
Thematic Analysis ◽  
Stakeholder Participation ◽  
Good Practice ◽  
Farm Animal ◽  
General View ◽  
Farm Animal Welfare ◽  
Farmer Knowledge ◽  
Communication Time

Farm animal welfare (FAW) is a growing societal concern, reflected by over 30 years of research to inform policy and practice. Despite the wealth of evidence to improve FAW, implementation of good practice continues to be an issue. The role of the stakeholder, particularly farmers, is pivotal to FAW improvement. This semi-systematic review synthesizes the evidence published in the last 30 years, worldwide, to address two main questions “what do farmers think (farmer’s general view) about farm animal welfare?” and “what are the factors that influence their thinking?”. A thematic analysis was conducted to identify factors that influenced the implementation of FAW innovation. The main outcomes extracted from 96 peer-reviewed publications on a range of livestock species identified 11 internal factors including farmer knowledge, empathy, personality, values, and human-animal bond; 15 external factors including economic advantages, communication, time and labor influenced the perception of FAW. Farmers’ knowledge and cost implications of FAW were the most frequently reported factors. The review further highlights the need for promoting interdisciplinary collaboration and stakeholder participation. This study suggests strategies to improve FAW, including tools to support behavioral changes amongst farmers.

scholarly journals Clinician Barriers and Facilitators to Routine HIV Testing: A Systematic Review of the Literature

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 232595822093601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann Dalton Bagchi ◽  
Tracy Davis
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Hiv Testing ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Data Synthesis ◽  
Routine Hiv Screening ◽  
Routine Hiv Testing ◽  
The Cochrane Library

Background: Routine HIV screening rates are suboptimal. Objectives: This systematic review identified barriers to/facilitators of routine HIV testing, categorized them using the socioecological model (SEM), and provided recommendations for interventions to increase screening. Data Sources: Included articles were indexed in PubMed, EBSCO CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library between 2006 and October 2018. Eligibility Criteria: Included studies were published in English or Spanish and directly assessed providers’ barriers/facilitators to routine screening. Data Extraction: We used a standardized Excel template to extract barriers/facilitators and identify levels in the SEM. Data Synthesis: Intrapersonal factors predominated as barriers, while facilitators were directed at the institutional level. Limitations: Policy barriers are not universal across countries. Meta-analysis was not possible. We could not quantify frequency of any given barrier/facilitator. Conclusions: Increasing reimbursement and adding screening as a quality measure may incentivize HIV testing; however, many interventions would require little resource investment.

scholarly journals Citizens, consumers and farm animal welfare: A meta-analysis of willingness-to-pay studies

Food Policy ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 68 ◽  
pp. 112-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beth Clark ◽  
Gavin B. Stewart ◽  
Luca A. Panzone ◽  
Ilias Kyriazakis ◽  
Lynn J. Frewer
Keyword(s):  
Willingness To Pay ◽  
Animal Welfare ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Farm Animal ◽  
Farm Animal Welfare

Edinburgh Farm Animal Welfare Scale

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth J. Austin ◽  
Ian J. Deary ◽  
Gareth Edwards-Jones ◽  
Dale Arey
Keyword(s):  
Animal Welfare ◽  
Farm Animal ◽  
Farm Animal Welfare
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document