A Need for Speed? Identifying the Effects of Space Acquisition Timelines on Space Deterrence and Conflict Outcomes

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Goirigolzarri
Keyword(s):  
Conflict Outcomes ◽  
Space Acquisition

Using Earned Value Data to Forecast the Duration of Department of Defense Space Acquisition Programs

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 92-107
Author(s):  
Shedrick Bridgeforth ◽  
Jonathan Ritschel ◽  
Edward D. White ◽  
Grant Keaton
Keyword(s):  
Department Of Defense ◽  
Earned Value ◽  
Space Acquisition

Power, Capabilities, and Paradoxical Conflict Outcomes

1989 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 239-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeev Maoz
Keyword(s):  
Social Choice ◽  
International Politics ◽  
Choice Theory ◽  
Social Choice Theory ◽  
Balkan Wars ◽  
And Control ◽  
Conflict Outcomes ◽  
Paradox Of Power

It has been persistently demonstrated that militarily superior states that are engaged in wars with militarily inferior ones may end up on the losing side. Unlike the processes by which military capabilities are converted into control over resources, the so-called “paradoxical conflict outcomes” phenomenon is more severe than a lack of correspondence between control over resources and control over outcomes. The paradox of power involves cases in which increased control over resources actually causes reduced control over outcomes. Several of the theoretical examples of this paradox are taken from social choice theory. These examples are applied to the analysis of the outcome of the Balkan Wars of 1912–1913 and of the Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 1982. The implications of the power paradox for theories of international politics are briefly discussed.

Between a Rock and a Hard Place

2012 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Staniland
Keyword(s):  
Sri Lanka ◽  
Civil Wars ◽  
Government Policy ◽  
The State ◽  
Careful Attention ◽  
Internal Politics ◽  
Conflict Outcomes ◽  
Over Time ◽  
Empirical Record ◽  
Hard Place

Ethnic insurgents sometimes defect to join forces with the state during civil wars. Ethnic defection can have important effects on conflict outcomes, but its causes have been understudied. Using Sunni defection in Iraq as a theory-developing case, this article offers a theory of “fratricidal flipping” that identifies lethal competition between insurgent factions as an important cause of defection. It examines the power of the fratricidal-flipping mechanism against competing theories in the cases of Kashmir and Sri Lanka. These wars involve within-conflict variation in defection across groups and over time. A detailed study of the empirical record, including significant fieldwork, suggests that fratricide was the dominant trigger for defection, while government policy played a secondary role in facilitating pro-state paramilitarism. Deep ideological disagreements were surprisingly unimportant in driving defection. The argument is probed in other wars in Asia. The complex internal politics of insurgent movements deserve careful attention.

Religion, Insurgency, and Counterinsurgency

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Klocek
Keyword(s):  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Irregular Warfare ◽  
Religious Wars ◽  
Causal Processes ◽  
Information Operations ◽  
Research Designs ◽  
Religious Dimensions ◽  
Conflict Outcomes ◽  
Radical Ideas

The academic study of religion and irregular warfare has expanded considerably since the turn of the 21st century—driven by both global events such as 9/11 and empirical studies that find armed rebellions with religious dimensions to be longer, bloodier, and more difficult to resolve than nonreligious conflicts. Most of this research focuses on the religious, usually radical, ideas and practices of insurgent groups. Of particular interest has been the way religion shapes the motivations and means of guerrilla fighters. Less attention has been paid to the role of counterinsurgent armies in irregular, religious wars. Following the U.S.-led invasions in Iraq and Afghanistan, a few initial studies explored how state forces misunderstand or ignore the religious dynamics of armed conflict. A growing body of research since the mid-2010s has pushed further, cataloguing a more varied set of ways counterinsurgent forces account for religion in combat and information operations. Moving forward, studies that look at both sides of the battlefield need to expand their empirical emphases, as well as more directly address a common set of challenges to the broader study of religious violence—how best to conceptualize, measure, and analyze the religious dynamics of war. Future scholarship should also consider research designs that test the causal processes purported to link religion with conflict outcomes and pay increased attention to the interaction between insurgent and counterinsurgent forces.

Three‐dimensional Yarnball k‐space acquisition for accelerated MRI

2020 ◽  
Vol 85 (4) ◽  
pp. 1840-1854
Author(s):  
Robert W. Stobbe ◽  
Christian Beaulieu
Keyword(s):  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Accelerated Mri ◽  
Space Acquisition

Please Help Us (or Don’t): External Interventions and Negotiated Settlements in Civil Conflicts

2020 ◽  
pp. 002200272095041
Author(s):  
Heather Elko McKibben ◽  
Amy Skoll
Keyword(s):  
Civil Conflict ◽  
Bargaining Process ◽  
Civil Conflicts ◽  
Negotiated Settlement ◽  
Rebel Groups ◽  
Negotiated Settlements ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Conflict Outcomes ◽  
External Interventions ◽  
External Intervention

How do different types of external intervention affect the likelihood of a negotiated settlement in civil conflicts? Drawing on the negotiation literature, which shows that the nature of the parties’ “best alternative to a negotiated agreement (BATNA)” influences the bargaining process between them, we argue different types of intervention affect governments’ and rebel groups’ BATNAs in different ways. This, in turn, affects the likelihood of a negotiated settlement. To test this argument, we address the fact that interventions are nonrandom, and that characteristics of civil conflicts that lead to different types of intervention also influence the likelihood of a negotiated settlement. We therefore use a two-stage statistical model. The first stage predicts the likelihood of different types of intervention, and drawing on those results, the second stage analyzes the likelihood of a negotiated settlement. The results provide insights into how different types of intervention affect civil conflict outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document