scholarly journals The characterization of a piston displacement-type flowmeter calibration facility and the calibration and use of pulsed output type flowmeters

Author(s):  
G.E. Mattingly
1962 ◽  
pp. 189-197
Author(s):  
H. L. Minkin ◽  
H. F. Hobart ◽  
I. Warshawsky

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
John W. Cooper ◽  
Steven W. Brown ◽  
Peter Abel ◽  
John E. Marketon ◽  
James J. Butler

2020 ◽  
Vol 118 (4) ◽  
pp. 462-469
Author(s):  
Roger J. Champion ◽  
Robert M. Golduber ◽  
Kimberlee J. Kearfott

Micromachines ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liang Zhou ◽  
Xiaoyang Zhang ◽  
Huikai Xie

This paper presents the design, fabrication, and characterization of an electrothermal MEMS mirror with large tip, tilt and piston scan. This MEMS mirror is based on electrothermal bimorph actuation with Cu and W thin-film layers forming the bimorphs. The MEMS mirror is fabricated via a combination of surface and bulk micromachining. The piston displacement and tip-tilt optical angle of the mirror plate of the fabricated MEMS mirror are around 114 μm and ±8°, respectively at only 2.35 V. The measured response time is 7.3 ms. The piston and tip-tilt resonant frequencies are measured to be 1.5 kHz and 2.7 kHz, respectively. The MEMS mirror survived 220 billion scanning cycles with little change of its scanning characteristics, indicating that the MEMS mirror is stable and reliable.


Volume 1 ◽  
2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. T. Yeh ◽  
P. I. Espina ◽  
G. E. Mattingly ◽  
N. R. Briggs ◽  
Jesu´s Aguilera

This paper presents the uncertainty characterization of NIST’s new hydrocarbon liquid flow calibrator (HLFC). This facility uses a passive piston prover technique where fluid is driven by pumps while the measuring piston is passively stroked through the calibration interval. This facility is typically operated using MIL-C-7024C fluid (also known as Stoddard solvent – a surrogate liquid for JP-4 and JP-5 jet fuels), but using a variety of other fluids offers a wider range of measurements. The range of flows for this facility is 0.19 to 5.7 liters per minute – lpm (0.05 to 1.5 gallons per minute – gpm). Over this range, the expanded uncertainty claim for this facility is ±0.01%, at 95% confidence level. The uncertainty of a dual-turbine meter tested in the system is also reported. In addition, NIST is working to incorporate additional piston provers so that the flow for hydrocarbon liquids calibration service will reach 760 lpm (200 gpm).


2013 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 9-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger C. Baker ◽  
Dave P. Gautrey ◽  
Dharshanie V. Mahadeva ◽  
Simon D. Sennitt ◽  
Alan J. Thorne

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document