scholarly journals NCCN NewsTreatment Disparities, Significance of the Doctor-Patient Relationship, Supportive Care Issues, and the Latest Guidelines UpdatesPatient, Provider, Caregiver: Physicians Share Lessons Learned When the Tables Are TurnedNCCN Imaging Appropriate Use Criteria Published for 13 Additional GuidelinesNew Supportive Care Resources From NCCN Help Patients With Cancer Confront Distress

2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. xxix-lxii
Keyword(s):  
Supportive Care ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Patient Relationship ◽  
Appropriate Use Criteria ◽  
Appropriate Use ◽  
Doctor Patient Relationship ◽  
Patients With Cancer

scholarly journals Relationship between doctors and patients in the end of life process in palliative care and dysthanasia

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 193-205
Author(s):  
Cynthia De Freitas Melo ◽  
Maria Rannielly de Araujo Lima Magalhães ◽  
Liza Maria Studart de Meneses ◽  
Railda Sabino Fernandes Alves ◽  
Ana Cristina Eberhardt Lins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Patient Relationship ◽  
Doctor Patient Relationship ◽  
Life Process ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Therapeutic Choice ◽  
Probabilistic Sample ◽  
Descriptive Survey

Introduction: In the course of an illness, when the patient receives a poor prognosis, he can be assisted with dysthanasia or palliative care. The therapeutic choice and the adherence to it are related, among other factors, to the quality of the doctor-patient relationship. The objective of this study was to evaluate the patients’ point of view of the doctor-patient relationship in the end of life process, and compare scores between patients in palliative care and those experiencing dysthanasia. Method: The design was a descriptive survey with a non-probabilistic sample composed of 234 patients with cancer in the end of life process: 117 in palliative care and 117 expriencing dysthanasia. Two instruments were used: a biodemographic questionnaire and the Questionnaire for Assessing the Doctor-Patient Relationship in the End of Life Process, and data were analyzed using descriptive and bivariate statistics in the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software. Results: The results showed good evaluations of the doctor-patient relationship. Palliative care patients attributed better scores in terms of time dedicated, attention, confidence, understanding and communication; and patients experiencing dysthanasia made better assessments in terms of frequency of visits and continuity of care. Conclusion: It is concluded that this study represents an advance in studies on the subject and indicates that patients in palliative care perceive the doctor-patient relationship more positively than patients undergoing dysthanasia. It stressed that it is necessary to invest in training medical students and professionals to carry out interventions that prioritize the use of their oldest, simplest and most powerful technology: the relationship between professionals and patients.

Beliefs about medicines, doctor-patient relationship, and coping among European patients with cancer

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 282-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luigi Grassi ◽  
Elena Meggiolaro ◽  
Maria Alejandra Berardi ◽  
Agustina Sirgo ◽  
Maria Cristina Colistro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Relationship ◽  
Doctor Patient Relationship ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Beliefs About Medicines ◽  
And Coping

The internet—A useful communication tool but no replacement for the doctor-patient relationship

2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A735-A735
Author(s):  
C STREETS ◽  
J PETERS ◽  
D BRUCE ◽  
P TSAI ◽  
N BALAJI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
The Internet ◽  
Patient Relationship ◽  
Communication Tool ◽  
Doctor Patient Relationship

Doctor-Patient Relationship: The Difficult Balance between Patient Psychology and Community Sociology

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-50
Author(s):  
Jose Luis Turabian
Keyword(s):  
Social Context ◽  
Interpersonal Relationship ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Community Relations ◽  
Patient Relationship ◽  
Doctor Patient Relationship ◽  
Important Place ◽  
Usual Model ◽  
Individual Personality ◽  
Object Of Study

Psychology and sociology share a common object of study, human behaviour, but from different perspectives. Sociologists have focused on macro variables, such as social structure, education, gender, age, race, etc., while psychology has focused on micro variables such as individual personality and behaviours, beliefs, empathy, listening, etc. Despite the importance of interpersonal relationship skills, they depend on the community or social context in which communication takes place, and by themselves may have little relevance in the consultation. The purely psychological analysis of the doctor-patient relationship often leads to an idyllic vision, with the patient-centred consultation as the greatest exponent, which rarely occurs in real life. The purely sociological or community / social analysis of the doctor-patient relationship leads to a negative view of the consultation, which is always shown as problematic. But, the psychological system in the doctor-patient relationship cannot be neglected, and its study is of importance, at least as an intermediate mechanism that is created through socio-community relations. Although the same social causes are behind the doctor-patient relationship, when acting on psychological factors in the consultation, they act as an optical prism scattering socio-community relations that affect the doctor and the patient, giving rise to a beam of different colors of doctor-patient relationship. In doctor-patient relationship there is a modality of psychotherapy, where attitudes, thoughts and behaviour of the patient, can be change, as well as it can be extended on the way of understanding and therefore changing, his social context. Because of the distance between socio-community relations and the form of doctor-patient relations is growing in complex societies, under these conditions, the sociological factor gives the important place to the psychological factor. Given these difficulties of the doctor-patient relationship one may ask how general medical practice can persist with the usual model of doctor-patient relationship. Pain and the desire to relieve them are the basic reasons for the patient and the doctor, and they do not disappear due to the contradictions of the doctor-patient relationship. In this way, the confrontation between sociological and psychological vision is replaced by an alliance of both currents, and each of them takes on meaning only in the general vision.

PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF GPS' KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDE ABOUT PERSON CENTRED CARE

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 567-570
Author(s):  
Radost Assenova ◽  
Levena Kireva ◽  
Gergana Foreva
Keyword(s):  
General Practice ◽  
Patient Empowerment ◽  
Patient Relationship ◽  
Preliminary Assessment ◽  
Doctor Patient Relationship ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Family Doctors ◽  
Person Centered Care ◽  
Centered Care

Introduction: The European definition of WONCA of general practice introduces the determinant elements of person-centered care regarding four important, interrelated characteristics: continuity of care, patient "empowerment", patient-centred approach, and doctor-patient relationship. The application of person-centred care in general practice refers to the GP's ability to master the patient-centered approach when working with patients and their problems in the respective context; use the general practice consultation to develop an effective doctor–patient relationship, with respect to patient’s autonomy; communicate, set priorities and establish a partnership when solving health problems; provide long-lasting care tailored to the needs of the patient and coordinate overall patient care. This means that GPs are expected to develop their knowledge and skills to use this key competence. Aim: The aim of this study is to make a preliminary assessment of the knowledge and attitudes of general practitioners regarding person-centered care. Material and methods: The opinion of 54 GPs was investigated through an original questionnaire, including closed questions, with more than one answer. The study involved each GP who has agreed to take part in organised training in person-centered care. The results were processed through the SPSS 17.0 version using descriptive statistics. Results: The distribution of respondents according to their sex is predominantly female - 34 (62.9%). It was found that GPs investigated by us highly appreciate the patient's ability to take responsibility, noting that it is important for them to communicate and establish a partnership with the patient - 37 (68.5%). One third of the respondents 34 (62.9%) stated the need to use the GP consultation to establish an effective doctor-patient relationship. The adoption of the patient-centered approach at work is important to 24 (44.4%) GPs. Provision of long-term care has been considered by 19 (35,2%). From the possible benefits of implementing person-centered care, GPs have indicated achieving more effective health outcomes in the first place - 46 (85.2%). Conclusion: Family doctors are aware of the elements of person-centered care, but in order to validate and fully implement this competence model, targeted GP training is required.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document