Build Your Own Fraction Computer!

2002 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 204-208
Author(s):  
Peter L. Glidden
Keyword(s):  
Conceptual Understanding ◽  
School Mathematics ◽  
Evaluation Standards ◽  
Addition And Subtraction ◽  
Principles And Standards ◽  
Fraction Addition

The NCTM's Curriculum and Evaluation Standards (1989) called for increased emphasis on promoting students' conceptual understanding of fractions and fraction operations; this call was reaffirmed in Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (NCTM 2000). Currently, many manipulatives, including pattern blocks, fraction circles, fraction squares, geodot paper, and fraction strips, are available to help teachers promote this understanding. This article describes another manipulative, the fraction computer, that I have found helpful for teaching fraction addition and subtraction.

Transition Boards: A Good Idea Made Better

1991 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 4-8
Author(s):  
John T. Sutton ◽  
Tonya D. Urbatsch
Keyword(s):  
Conceptual Understanding ◽  
Mathematics Curriculum ◽  
School Mathematics ◽  
Evaluation Standards ◽  
Addition And Subtraction ◽  
School Mathematics Curriculum

The Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (NCTM 1989) recognizes that addition and subtraction computations remain an important part of the school mathematics curriculum and recommends that the emphasis be shifted to the understanding of concepts. Transition boards are simple devices to aid students' conceptual understanding.

Implementing the Standards: Building key Concepts for Calculus in Grades 7–12

1990 ◽  
Vol 83 (7) ◽  
pp. 532-540
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Jockusch ◽  
Patrick J. Mcloughlin
Keyword(s):  
Conceptual Understanding ◽  
Mathematics Curriculum ◽  
School Mathematics ◽  
Evaluation Standards ◽  
Mathematics Standards ◽  
Key Concepts ◽  
Natural Extensions

The NCTM'S Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (Standards) (1989) recommends that the mathematics curriculum should include informal explorations of calculus concepts. These concepts can be developed as natural extensions of topics that students have already encountered. The approach should focus on exploring concrete problems in a way designed to build conceptual understanding of key ideas and to offer an introduction to some interesting applications.

Spotlight on the Principles: Creating an Environment for Learning with Understanding: The Learning Principle

2005 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-39
Author(s):  
Emily Fagan
Keyword(s):  
Prior Knowledge ◽  
Conceptual Understanding ◽  
School Mathematics ◽  
Factual Knowledge ◽  
Procedural Fluency ◽  
New Knowledge ◽  
Principles And Standards ◽  
Knowledge Learning

The learning principle in NCTM'S Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (2000) states: “Students must learn mathematics with understanding, actively building new knowledge from experience and prior knowledge.” Learning with understanding is defined as “being able to apply procedures, concepts, and processes” (NCTM 2000, p. 20). This view of learning represents a departure from a view that emphasizes a student's factual knowledge and ability to apply procedures. Although facts and procedures are important, they will not, in and of themselves, result in learning with understanding. Instead, factual understanding, procedural fluency, and conceptual understanding must coexist so that students reach learning with understanding. The extent to which a student can apply his or her learning to a new problem or situation is often an indicator of this understanding.

Felix Klein and the NCTM's Standards: A Mathematician Considers Mathematics Education

2000 ◽  
Vol 93 (8) ◽  
pp. 714-717
Author(s):  
Kim Krusen McComas
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Education ◽  
School Mathematics ◽  
Rote Learning ◽  
German Mathematician ◽  
Evaluation Standards ◽  
10Th Anniversary ◽  
Felix Klein ◽  
Look Back ◽  
Principles And Standards ◽  
Year 2000

The year 1999 marked the 10th anniversary of the NCTM's Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. It also marked the 150th anniversary of the birth of German mathematician Felix Klein, who lived from 1849 to 1925. Although the relation between these two anniversaries may not be obvious, the connection is that Klein, were he still alive today, would probably support the NCTM's Standards. As the year 2000 brings us NCTM's Principles and Standards for School Mathematics, let us look back to the year 1900 and find Felix Klein at the forefront of a movement to reform mathematics education from rote learning to more meaningful mathematical learning.

Learning Geometry and a New Language

2000 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 246-250
Author(s):  
Donna Norton Swindal
Keyword(s):  
Conceptual Understanding ◽  
School Mathematics ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Evaluation Standards ◽  
Spatial Sense ◽  
Television Shows ◽  
Geometric Concepts ◽  
The World

The world of geometry has a language of its own. Although most of our students learn the label names for several two-dimensional shapes from childrens' television shows, they still need to understand geometric concepts, recognize opportunities for applying these concepts, and be able to communicate using the concepts in authentic situations. NCTM's Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (1989) jolted many teachers into realizing the need for deeper exploration of geometry. Students need the time and opportunity to develop spatial sense and investigate two- and threedimensional figures in a setting that encourages inquiry and immerses students in the experience, language, and conceptual understanding of geometry.

Spotlight on the Principles/Standards: Building Mathematically Powerful Students through Connections

2002 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 484-488
Author(s):  
Christine Thomas ◽  
Carmelita Santiago
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Curriculum ◽  
School Mathematics ◽  
Mathematical Tasks ◽  
Evaluation Standards ◽  
Mathematical Ideas ◽  
Natural Inclination ◽  
Points Of View ◽  
Principles And Standards

Connections in mathematics can be implemented in ways that create excitement in the classroom, develop in students a love for doing mathematics, and foster students' natural inclination for pursuing mathematical tasks. According to the Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics, “If students are to become mathematically powerful, they must be flexible enough to approach situations in a variety of ways and recognize the relationships among different points of view” (NCTM 1989, p. 84). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (NCTM 2000) further asserts that students develop a deeper and more lasting understanding of mathematics when they are able to connect mathematical ideas. The 1989 and 2000 Standards clearly delineate the power and importance of connections in the mathematics curriculum. This article examines and compares curricular recommendations for connections in the two documents.

Abi, A. M. (2016). Integrasi Etnomatematika Dalam Kurikulum Matematika Sekolah. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Indonesia, 1-6. François, K. (2009). The Role of Ethnomathematics within Mathematics Education. Proceedings of CERME 6 (pp. 1517-1526). Lyon France: INRP 2010. Mansur HR. (2015, February). Menciptakan Pembelajaran Efektif melalui Apersepsi. Retrieved from LPMP Sulsel: http://www.lpmpsulsel.net/v2/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=327:pembelajaran‐efektif‐ M.Balamurugan. (2015). ETHNOMATHEMATICS; AN APPROACH FOR LEARNING MATHEMATICS FROM MULTICULTURAL PERSPECTIVES. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 716-720. NCTM. (1989). Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. Snipes, V., & Moses, P. (2001). Linking Mathematics and Culture to Teach Geometry Concepts. Retrieved from Semantic Scholar: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Linking-Mathematics-and-Culture-to-Teach-Geometry-Snipes/de16ae98aa72c9eef916e40f2e91dd17deb5a179 Stylianides, A. J., & Stylianides, G. J. (2007). Learning Mathematics with Understanding: A Critical Consideration of the Learning Principle in the Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 103-114. Sukayati, & Suharjana, A. (2009). PEMANFAATAN ALAT PERAGA MATEMATIKA DALAM PEMBELAJARAN DI SD. Yogyakarta: PPPPTK Matematika Yogyakarta. Wijaya, A., Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., Doorman, M., & Robitzsch, A. (2014). Difficulties in solving context-based PISA mathematics tasks: An analysis of students’ errors. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 555-584. Yusuf, M. W., Ibrahim Saidu, I., & Halliru, A. (2010). ETHNOMATHEMATICS (A Mathematical Game in Hausa Culture). International Journal of Mathematical Science Education, 36-42. Yvette d’Entremont, Y. (2015). Linking mathematics, culture and community. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2818 – 2824.

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 1928-1941
Author(s):  
Ernawati . ◽  
◽  
Kurniawati . ◽  
Keyword(s):  
School Mathematics ◽  
Mathematical Science ◽  
Evaluation Standards ◽  
Mathematics Tasks ◽  
Learning Mathematics ◽  
Mathematical Game ◽  
Principles And Standards ◽  
Multicultural Perspectives ◽  
Critical Consideration

Principles and Standards: What is Algebra in Elementary School

2001 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 196-200
Author(s):  
Jennifer M. Bay-Williams
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Elementary School ◽  
School Children ◽  
Elementary School Children ◽  
School Mathematics ◽  
Evaluation Standards ◽  
Early Mathematics ◽  
Principles And Standards ◽  
Abstract Content ◽  
K 12

Patterns have long been part of early mathematics experiences. The K–4 Patterns and Relationships Standard in Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (NCTM 1989) was replaced in Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (NCTM 2000) with a K–12 Algebra Standard. This Standard encompasses patterns, functions, and some topics that are beyond what traditionally was considered to be algebra. However, the word algebra, often associated with content covered in a traditional middle school or high school course, can evoke feelings of anxiety and raise questions of appropriateness when discussed in relation to elementary school children. What is algebra in elementary school if it is more than identifying and extending patterns in the early grades yet is not the abstract content of an algebra course?

Understanding Students' Problem-Solving Knowledge through Their Writing

2007 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 102-109
Author(s):  
Diana F. Steele
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
School Mathematics ◽  
Evaluation Standards ◽  
Writing In Mathematics ◽  
Principles And Standards

The Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics, published in 1989 by NCTM, placed an emphasis on the importance of communication for learning and doing mathematics. Writing is one way to achieve this valuable communication in the classroom. In 2000, Principles and Standards for School Mathematics emphasized writing as being an important aspect of communication: “Writing in mathematics can also help students consolidate their thinking because it requires them to reflect on their work and clarify their thoughts about the ideas developed in the lesson' (NCTM 2000, p. 61). Several studies have also shown ways that writing can be an effective tool for improving students' learning of mathematics (Bell and Bell 1985; Pugalee 2001; Steele 2005). Pugalee (2001) found in his work with students that writing could potentially help students increase their problemsolving ability in mathematics.

Families Ask: Understanding Mathematics and Basic Skills

2001 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-9
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Brahier
Keyword(s):  
School Districts ◽  
Teaching Practices ◽  
Real Life ◽  
School Mathematics ◽  
Curriculum Materials ◽  
Community Members ◽  
Evaluation Standards ◽  
Life Problems ◽  
Hands On ◽  
Principles And Standards

Since the publication of Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (NCTM 1989) and Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (NCTM 2000), many school districts and teachers have implemented new curriculum materials to achieve the vision of the Standards. In addition, many educators have adopted a constructivist viewpoint in their teaching practices, resulting in hands-on lessons for children and the use of real-life problems, visual and hands-on approaches, and invented strategies for solving problems. In the context of reform, however, parents and community members are prone to question whether their children will actually “learn the basics” when engaged in hands-on, real-life investigations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document