Implementing the Standards: Building key Concepts for Calculus in Grades 7–12

1990 ◽  
Vol 83 (7) ◽  
pp. 532-540
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Jockusch ◽  
Patrick J. Mcloughlin
Keyword(s):  
Conceptual Understanding ◽  
Mathematics Curriculum ◽  
School Mathematics ◽  
Evaluation Standards ◽  
Mathematics Standards ◽  
Key Concepts ◽  
Natural Extensions

The NCTM'S Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (Standards) (1989) recommends that the mathematics curriculum should include informal explorations of calculus concepts. These concepts can be developed as natural extensions of topics that students have already encountered. The approach should focus on exploring concrete problems in a way designed to build conceptual understanding of key ideas and to offer an introduction to some interesting applications.

Transition Boards: A Good Idea Made Better

1991 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 4-8
Author(s):  
John T. Sutton ◽  
Tonya D. Urbatsch
Keyword(s):  
Conceptual Understanding ◽  
Mathematics Curriculum ◽  
School Mathematics ◽  
Evaluation Standards ◽  
Addition And Subtraction ◽  
School Mathematics Curriculum

The Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (NCTM 1989) recognizes that addition and subtraction computations remain an important part of the school mathematics curriculum and recommends that the emphasis be shifted to the understanding of concepts. Transition boards are simple devices to aid students' conceptual understanding.

One Point of View: Reclaiming School Mathematics

1990 ◽  
Vol 37 (8) ◽  
pp. 4-5
Author(s):  
Portia Elliott
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Education ◽  
Mathematics Curriculum ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
School Mathematics ◽  
Evaluation Standards ◽  
Design Change

The framers of the Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (NCTM 1989) call for a radical “design change” in all aspects of mathematics education. They believe that “evaluation is a tool for implementing the Standards and effecting change systematically” (p. 189). They warn, however, that “without changes in how mathematics is assessed, the vision of the mathematics curriculum described in the standards will not be implemented in classrooms, regardless of how texts or local curricula change” (p. 252).

Coordinate Geometry: A Powerful Tool for Solving Problems

1990 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. 264-268
Author(s):  
Stanley F. Taback
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Mathematical Problem ◽  
School Mathematics ◽  
Mathematical Problem Solving ◽  
Evaluation Standards ◽  
Mathematical Ideas ◽  
Mathematics Standards ◽  
Problem Situations ◽  
Coordinate Geometry

In calling for reform in the teaching and learning of mathematics, the Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (Standards) developed by NCTM (1989) envisions mathematics study in which students reason and communicate about mathematical ideas that emerge from problem situations. A fundamental premise of the Standards, in fact, is the belief that “mathematical problem solving … is nearly synonymous with doing mathematics” (p. 137). And the ability to solve problems, we are told, is facilitated when students have opportunities to explore “connections” among different branches of mathematics.

Technology Tips: Using a Graphing Utility as a Catalyst for Connections

1997 ◽  
Vol 90 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-56
Author(s):  
Charles Vonder Embse ◽  
Arne Engebretsen
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Curriculum ◽  
School Mathematics ◽  
Evaluation Standards

One of the most important ideas expressed in the Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (NCTM 1989) is that of connections. The Standards document recommends that “the mathematics curriculum should include investigation of the connections and interplay among various mathematical topics and their applications … ”

Learning Geometry and a New Language

2000 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 246-250
Author(s):  
Donna Norton Swindal
Keyword(s):  
Conceptual Understanding ◽  
School Mathematics ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Evaluation Standards ◽  
Spatial Sense ◽  
Television Shows ◽  
Geometric Concepts ◽  
The World

The world of geometry has a language of its own. Although most of our students learn the label names for several two-dimensional shapes from childrens' television shows, they still need to understand geometric concepts, recognize opportunities for applying these concepts, and be able to communicate using the concepts in authentic situations. NCTM's Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (1989) jolted many teachers into realizing the need for deeper exploration of geometry. Students need the time and opportunity to develop spatial sense and investigate two- and threedimensional figures in a setting that encourages inquiry and immerses students in the experience, language, and conceptual understanding of geometry.

Geometry and Language—A Natural Connection

1997 ◽  
Vol 3 (8) ◽  
pp. 454-457
Author(s):  
Lionel Pereira-Mendoza
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Curriculum ◽  
Written Language ◽  
School Mathematics ◽  
Evaluation Standards ◽  
Natural Connection

A quick reading of the literature indicates that the use of language, both written and oral, in mathematics has received a great deal of attention. The importance of language, and of writing in particular, is reflected in such documents as the Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (NCTM 1989). The question facing teachers is not whether oral and written language should be part of the mathematics curriculum but how language can be used effectively.

What Is in the Daily News? Problem-Solving Opportunities!

1999 ◽  
Vol 5 (7) ◽  
pp. 390-394
Author(s):  
Robyn Silbey
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Real World ◽  
Mathematics Curriculum ◽  
School Mathematics ◽  
Daily News ◽  
Evaluation Standards ◽  
Mathematical Ideas ◽  
The Everyday ◽  
Everyday World ◽  
Real World Problems

In An Agenda for Action, the NCTM asserted that problem solving must be at the heart of school mathematics (1980). Almost ten years later, the NCTM's Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (1989) stated that the development of each student's ability to solve problems is essential if he or she is to be a productive citizen. The Standards assumed that the mathematics curriculum would emphasize applications of mathematics. If mathematics is to be viewed as a practical, useful subject, students must understand that it can be applied to various real-world problems, since most mathematical ideas arise from the everyday world. Furthermore, the mathematics curriculum should include a broad range of content and an interrelation of that content.

Communicating in the Languge of Mathematics

1995 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 324-329
Author(s):  
Larry Buschmon
Keyword(s):  
Entire Range ◽  
Mathematics Curriculum ◽  
School Mathematics ◽  
Evaluation Standards

As the classroom mathematics curriculum expands to encompass the entire range of skills included in the NCTM's Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (1989), the process by which a student arrives at the answer to a problem becomes as important as the answer itself.

Spotlight on the Principles/Standards: Building Mathematically Powerful Students through Connections

2002 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 484-488
Author(s):  
Christine Thomas ◽  
Carmelita Santiago
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Curriculum ◽  
School Mathematics ◽  
Mathematical Tasks ◽  
Evaluation Standards ◽  
Mathematical Ideas ◽  
Natural Inclination ◽  
Points Of View ◽  
Principles And Standards

Connections in mathematics can be implemented in ways that create excitement in the classroom, develop in students a love for doing mathematics, and foster students' natural inclination for pursuing mathematical tasks. According to the Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics, “If students are to become mathematically powerful, they must be flexible enough to approach situations in a variety of ways and recognize the relationships among different points of view” (NCTM 1989, p. 84). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (NCTM 2000) further asserts that students develop a deeper and more lasting understanding of mathematics when they are able to connect mathematical ideas. The 1989 and 2000 Standards clearly delineate the power and importance of connections in the mathematics curriculum. This article examines and compares curricular recommendations for connections in the two documents.

Integrating Manipulatives and Computers in Problem-Solving Experiences

1990 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 8-10
Author(s):  
Sue Brown
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Group Work ◽  
Mathematics Instruction ◽  
School Mathematics ◽  
National Council ◽  
Evaluation Standards ◽  
Mathematics Standards ◽  
Good Mathematics Instruction ◽  
K 12

In 1980, the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics stated that “problem solving must be the focus of school mathematics.” In 1989 the Council reaffirmed that belief with the Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (Standards). Standard 1 for grades K–12 is “Mathematics as Problem Solving.” The Standards also asserts that “a computer should be available in every classroom for demonstration purposes, and every student should have access to a computer for individual and group work.” Also according to the Standards, “manipulative materials are necessary for good mathematics instruction.” In a typical classroom, problem solving may be taught, manipulative materials may be used, or students may be working at a computer. These functions, however, are usually completed as disjoint activities. Integrating these activities is possible, and this article illustrates how it can be done.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document