What Results are We Getting from Graphic Algebra?

1911 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-20
Author(s):  
Arthur Whipple Smith

I feel that I should explain to you that my acquaintance with the work of the secondary schools is entirely second hand and it may be that my ideas on the subject of graphics in secondary work are colored by what I may wish were possible instead of being entirely true to the facts. In my own experience as an instructor of freshmen I have found but little evidence indicating previous instruction in graphics and frequently the subject is thrust suddenly upon a freshman by the immediate needs of his college work. In many cases it is looked upon as only another novelty introduced to make college mathematics a thing to be dreaded and avoided if possible. I assume that it is proper for an instructor in first-year college work to expect a greater or less degree of familiarity with graphics on the part of incoming students and from this standpoint consider the question as to what may be gained by the study of graphics in connection with all branches of elementary mathematics. The subject should appeal to teachers of mathematics for at least three reasons, first, it is the simplest of our many symbolisms for magnitudes and in the order of nature precedes all the others: second, it often appeals to certain pupils who would otherwise be uninterested: third it affords connecting links among all branches of mathematics.

1910 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-36
Author(s):  
M. J. Babb

It has generally happened in the past that teachers of elementary mathematics have had little or no acquaintance with what is generally called the higher mathematics. Even when a boy went to college he promptly forgot his elementary mathematics, and if by chance he became a teacher in the secondary schools there was no one to advise with him on means of applying what he had learned to the work in hand. Necessarily he drifted into the stereotyped manner of teaching the subject and his college work was only a pleasant memory. The college teachers were often recruited from men who naturally had very little knowledge of the problems of elementary education. Very few would have been able to grasp the point of view of the youthful mind: many were thoroughly ingrossed in their subject and had found ideals of rigidity of statement and proof as far beyond the ken of the elementary schools as they were in advance of the notions of those who intuitively founded the subject wiser than they knew.


1950 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 124
Author(s):  
E. M. Beesley ◽  
P. H. Daus ◽  
W. M. Whyburn

1937 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 201
Author(s):  
L. J. Adams ◽  
M. A. Hill ◽  
J. Burton Linker

1942 ◽  
Vol 49 (10) ◽  
pp. 675
Author(s):  
L. L. Lowenstein ◽  
C. C. Richtmeyer ◽  
J. W. Foust

1909 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 94-104
Author(s):  
N. J. Lennes

One of the most obvious facts about mathematics in our secondary schools is a very general dissatisfaction which is expressed on all sides. There is an alarming number of failures, especially in the first year of the high school, which argues that the pupils do not find the subject suited to their tastes and capacities. Instructors in the colleges and universities rarely miss an opportunity for declaring that their students came poorly prepared. The programs of teachers' meetings and the tables of contents of pedagogical journals are teeming with titles which assume that something is wrong.


The study focused on the development and validation of modules in Basic Mathematics. This was initiated as a response to the need to improve students’ performance which would help develop students’ mathematical ability in comprehending the subject. The study determined the difference between the pre-achievement and post-achievement tests of the students holding constant their attitude towards Mathematics and English 11 grade and how some experts evaluated the module according to its qualitative features. Structured in a quasi-experimental design, the study involved 18 first year college students who got a failing mark in Basic Mathematics. Five Mathematics professors validated the modules. The instruments developed in the study were the achievement test, the 20-item questionnaire for the experts and the 20-item attitudinal test. The statistical tools used were the analysis of covariance, t-test for correlated scores, and the KR20. The pre-test mean score of the students was much lower than the posttest mean score. The students manifested favorable attitude towards Mathematics. Correlation analysis showed that English is not related to posttest achievement of students and the posttest achievement score was significantly influenced by their attitude. On the qualitative features of the prepared modules, they were evaluated to be good and acceptable to the Mathematics teachers. The modules are valid and reliable and could supplement on the learning of concepts. The teaching of Basic Mathematics using the modular approach is an effective approach in enhancing the learning of Mathematics.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document