A Fallacy in Geometry Reasoning
In the mathematics teacher for December, 1928, I attempted to expose a weakness in the usual proofs of beginning geometry and advocated a new and slightly different beginning which at the same time bas the virtue of being more simple. The usual order of proofs is (1) congruence by side-angle-side; (2) congruence by angle-sideangle; (3) the theorem that the angles opposite the equal sides of an isosceles triangle are equal; (4) congruence by three sides; and (5) sometime later, the construction of an angle bisector and of an angle equal to a given angle. We are concerned here with only (3), (4), and (5).
Keyword(s):
2020 ◽
Vol 22
(1)
◽
pp. 63-80
2020 ◽
Vol VIII(228)
(92)
◽
pp. 7-10
2020 ◽
Vol 3
(2)
◽
pp. 222-233