Algebraic Magic Squares

1921 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-77

There comes a time in the school year, usually during the spring term, when the mathematics teacher becomes convinced that as far as algebra is concerned, he might just as well be teaching so many “wooden Indians.” Those pupils, who are not wholly in a trance, are surreptitiously fondling a baseball glove, while x’s and y’s pass by unheeded. The teacher’s first impulse is to give every one a good shaking in a frantic attempt to close the ever-widening gap between the intellectual capacity of his pupils and the intelligibility of his subject. He realizes something must be done at once, if his class is to learn any more algebra that year.

2006 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  
pp. 84
Author(s):  
Steve Willoughby

The annual publication of the Association of Teachers of Mathematics in the Middle States and Maryland became a quarterly journal called the Mathematics Teacher in 1908. W. H. Metzler, a professor at Syracuse University, served as its editor from its inception until it became the official journal of the newly formed National Council of Teachers of Mathematics in January 1921, with J. R. Clark as the new editor. In 1921, the present monthly schedule of publication for the school year was adopted.


2006 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 3
Author(s):  
Ann Lawrence

We are excited to introduce volume 12 of our journal in this, the 100th anniversary of NCTM's first journal, the Mathematics Teacher. As we celebrate, our goal, as always, is to enhance the dialogue among the community of mathematics educators interested in the middle grades. We would like to challenge our readers to support your journal this school year through the following opportunities.


1974 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 396-400
Author(s):  
David F. Robitaille

There are a number of mathematical problems associated with the game of chess and with chessboards. The first of three such problems discussed in this article involves magic squares. It is not my purpose to describe methods of generating magic squares here, so only a brief discussion is included. (There are many references available on the subject of constructing magic squares, including an article by Ralph Munger in the February 1973 issue of the MATHEMATICS TEACHER.)


2007 ◽  
Vol 101 (1) ◽  
pp. 5

Welcome to a new century of Mathematics Teacher. As we begin volume 101, we celebrate our past accomplishments and look forward to our futures?both in terms of the successes we anticipate and the challenges we shall face. As you take your first steps forward in a new school year, we invite you to embark on a journey with us toward more engaging instruction; a more coherent articulation of curriculum; a more effective use of technology; and, most important, a deeper understanding and appreciation of mathematics on the part of our students.


1952 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 385-390
Author(s):  
John R. Mayor ◽  
John A. Brown

In the November, February and April numbers of The Mathematics Teacher for the 1950-51 school year three sets of questions on Mathematics Enrollments, General Mathematics, and Third Year Mathematics, respectively, were published in this Department of The Mathematics Teacher. All three sets of questions were given again in the November, 1951 number. Preliminary reports on answers received have been published in the April, 1951 and the November, 1951 numbers.


1942 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 179-181
Author(s):  
Norman N. Royall

I have read, with ever increasing incredulity, an article in the October (1941) issue of The Mathematics Teacher entitled “A Functional Revision of Plane Geometry” by P. H. Nygaard. Mr. Nygaard's article is such a glaring example of the type of discussion which finds its way into print today to the mortal harm of sound instruction in mathematics that I can not let it pass unchallenged. We have here at Winthrop a student chapter of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics into the hands of whose members there comes each month during the school year a copy of The Mathematics Teacher. Since I am the faculty sponsor of this group I can for them correct the enors in Mr. Nygaard's essay. The effect of this correction is, however, limited by the range of my voice; therefore, I hope that my reply may have full publicity in The Mathematics Teacher to the end that I may reach the audience afforded to Mr. Nygaard.


1995 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 440

We are pleased to report to readers that the extremely positive response to Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School (MTMS) and the growing backlog of accepted manuscripts have allowed us to boost our frequency of publications from four to five issues per year, beginning with this school year. The next five issues will complete the first volume and will appear as the following: September-October, November-December, january-February, March-April, and May. As of 1 May 1995. our records show that just over 30 000 members are currently receiving MTMS. These numbers tell us That this burgeoning group of professionals involved in middle-grades mathematics needs such a journal. We on the Editorial Panel will continue working to offer the quality product that readers have come to expect and will continue to seek out your feedback and suggestions for improvement, not to mention your manuscripts and ideas. As our manuscript backlog grows, we will consider increasing our publishing frequency again, working our way up to the nine issues per year that matches the output of NTCM's other fine journals, Teaching Children Mathematics and the Mathematics Teacher.


1956 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 305-306

During most of its existence the Council has depended upon a group of state representatives. These persons are something like dollar-a-year people, except that they do not even get the dollar. About all the recognition they get is to have their names printed once each year in The Mathematics Teacher. The list of representatives and their addresses for the present school year is given below and on the following page.


1988 ◽  
Vol 81 (8) ◽  
pp. 674-678
Author(s):  
Judson McCranie

In an article in the Mathematics Teacher, Pizarro (1986) makes the statement that no general procedures seem to be available for generating magic squares of even orders. His mysterious statement is definitely false. Methods of construction for all orders have been known for decades.


Author(s):  
Rayssa Melo de Oliveira ◽  
Marcilia Chagas Barreto ◽  
Gleiciane Ferreira Farias

ResumoEste artigo buscou responder ao seguinte questionamento: que elementos da Teoria dos Campos Conceituais (TCC) foram incorporados à prática docente por uma professora que ensina matemática, após a vivência de processo formativo que tomou por base a referida teoria. Desta forma, o objetivo da pesquisa consistiu em analisar elementos do processo de formação continuada presentes na prática educativa de uma professora, no que tange ao trabalho com estruturas multiplicativas, em sua sala de aula do 4º ano. O estudo baseou-se na abordagem qualitativa; os instrumentos de coleta de dados foram análise documental e observação participante. Foram analisados os planejamentos realizados pela professora, durante um ano letivo, dentre os quais foram localizadas 14 aulas destinadas às estruturas multiplicativas. Observaram-se 4 aulas da professora, no período em que ela trabalhava em sala de aula o referido campo. Evidenciou-se que a professora propôs diversidade de situações em suas aulas, bem como propiciou o desenvolvimento de diferentes estratégias pelos alunos. Em contrapartida, a educadora não proporcionou troca de experiências entre os estudantes, tornando a aprendizagem um trabalho individual. No processo de aprendizagem, o protagonismo permanece com a professora que orienta o modo de resolução das situações. O erro foi frequentemente deixado de lado, desconsideradas suas contribuições para a aprendizagem. Concluiu-se que o processo formativo culminou em avanços práticos e teóricos, porém com permanência de lacunas didáticas para o ensino de Matemática.Palavras-chave: Formação de professores, Ensino de Matemática, Estruturas Multiplicativas.AbstractThis paper attempted to answer the following question: what elements of Conceptual Field Theory were incorporated into the classroom practice of a mathematics teacher, after she experienced a formative process based on this theory. The aim of the research was thus to analyze elements of the continued education process present in the classroom practice of a 4th grade teacher in respect to her work with multiplying structures. The study adopted a qualitative approach, and the data were collected through documental analysis and participant observation. Class plans produced by the teacher over a period of one school year were analyzed, among which 14 were dedicated to the teaching of multiplying structures. Four actual classes in which the teacher addressed multiplying structures were also observed and analyzed. It was found that, in her classes, the teacher was able to propose a diversity of situations and encouraged the development of different strategies by the students. She failed, however, to stimulate the exchange of experiences among students, thus making learning an individual experience. In the learning process, the teacher remained the protagonist, indicating how situations should be handled. Mistakes were frequently overlooked, as if they had no importance in the learning process. The conclusion was that the continued education process contributed practical and theoretical advances. However, didactic gaps for the teaching of mathematics persist.Keywords: Teacher training, Mathematics teaching, Multiplying Structures.ResumenEste artículo buscó responder la siguiente pregunta: qué elementos de la Teoría de Campos conceptuales fueron incorporados a la práctica docente de una profesora que enseña matemáticas, después de experimentar un proceso formativo que se basó en esa teoría. Por lo tanto, el objetivo de la investigación consistió en analizar elementos del proceso de formación continua presente en la práctica educativa de una profesora, con relación al trabajo con estructuras multiplicativas, en su clase del 4º de la primaria.  El estudio se basó en el enfoque cualitativo y los instrumentos de recolección de datos fueron análisis documentales y observación participante. Se analizaron los planes de clase realizados por la profesora, durante un año escolar, entre los cuales se ubicaron 14 clases dirigidas a estructuras multiplicativas. También fueron observadas 4 clases de la profesora, en el período que ella trabajó en el aula en ese campo. Se hizo evidente que la docente propuso una diversidad de situaciones en sus clases, además de permitir el desarrollo de diferentes estrategias por parte de los alumnos. Por otro lado, ella no intercambió experiencias entre los estudiantes, lo que convirtió el aprendizaje en un trabajo individual. En el proceso de aprendizaje, el protagonismo permanece con la profesora que guía la forma de resolver situaciones. El error fue a menudo dejado de lado, visto como algo que no contribuye al aprendizaje. Se concluye que el proceso formativo culminó en avances prácticos y teóricos, sin embargo, se evidenció la permanencia de brechas didácticas para la enseñanza de las matemáticas.Palabras clave: Formación de profesores. Enseñanza de matemáticas. Estructuras multiplicativas.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document