For Your Information: May 2008

2008 ◽  
Vol 101 (9) ◽  
pp. 695-697
Keyword(s):  
Student Learning ◽  
Mathematics Teaching ◽  
Mathematics Curriculum ◽  
Professional Standards ◽  
Success For All ◽  
Teaching Mathematics ◽  
National Council ◽  
Standards Documents ◽  
Improve Student Learning ◽  
Learning And Achievement

In its 1989 and 2000 standards documents, the national council of teachers of mathematics (nctm) describes a vision of mathematics curriculum to ensure success for all students. However, “more than curriculum standards documents are needed to improve student learning and achievement. Teaching matters” (p. 3). In that spirit, nctm delivers the rest of the picture—mathematics teaching today, a revision of the 1991 professional standards for teaching mathematics.

Mathematics Teaching Today

2009 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 400-403
Author(s):  
Tami S. Martin ◽  
William R. Speer
Keyword(s):  
Student Learning ◽  
Mathematics Teaching ◽  
Professional Growth ◽  
Professional Standards ◽  
Teaching Mathematics ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Improving Student Learning

Features, consistent messages, and new components of Mathematics Teaching Today: Improving Practice, Improving Student Learning (NCTM 2007), an updated edition of Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics (NCTM 1991). The new book describes aspects of high-quality mathematics teaching; offers a model for observing, supervising, and improving mathematics teaching; and outlines guidelines for the education and continued professional growth of teachers.

Principles to Actions: Moving to a framework for teaching mathematics

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 133-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
DeAnn Huinker
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Education ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Success For All ◽  
Content Standards ◽  
Teaching Mathematics ◽  
National Council ◽  
Professional Work ◽  
Evaluation Standards ◽  
Teaching Of Mathematics ◽  
Mathematical Success

In 1989 the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) launched the standards-based education movement with the release of Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (NCTM 1989). Subsequent publications built on this foundation by further detailing the mathematics content of student learning (NCTM 2000, 2006; CCSSI 2010). We have learned, however, that more is needed than content standards if we are to realize the goal of high levels of mathematical understanding by each and every student. For that reason, NCTM formed a writing team in 2012 to envision and develop a document that could guide mathematics education into the future. I served as one of three lead writers on this team. After several revisions, including feedback on a public review draft, our work resulted in the publication of Principles to Actions: Ensuring Mathematical Success for All (NCTM 2014). In this article, I provide some background on Principles to Actions, reflect on its initial impact, and suggest next steps for our professional work toward ambitious teaching of mathematics.

Using Games to Meet the Standards for Middle School Students

1993 ◽  
Vol 40 (9) ◽  
pp. 499-503
Author(s):  
Lisa M. Leonard ◽  
Dyanne M. Tracy
Keyword(s):  
Middle School Students ◽  
Mathematics Teaching ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Professional Standards ◽  
Teaching Mathematics ◽  
National Council ◽  
Teaching Behaviors ◽  
School Students ◽  
Evaluation Standards ◽  
Broad Framework

It is evident that our society as a whole needs to take a new look at the way mathematics is taught. The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) has publ ished documents to establish a broad framework that will lead to the transformation of the teaching and learning of mathematics. The Curriculum and Evaluation Standards (1989) calls for a reform in school mathematics based on societal and economic needs. The Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics (1991) makes suggestions for teachers about ways to change their mathematics teaching behaviors on the basis of the curriculum standards. It will take time to educate teachers and administrators about both documents.

Do the Standards Go Far Enough? Power, Policy, and Practice in Mathematics Education

1992 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 412-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael W. Apple
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Education ◽  
Educational Reform ◽  
Mathematical Knowledge ◽  
Mathematics Curriculum ◽  
Professional Standards ◽  
Teaching Mathematics ◽  
Policy And Practice ◽  
Conservative Movement ◽  
Evaluation Standards

Although NCTM's Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (1989) and Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics (1991) are generating considerable interest, there has been little discussion of their ideological and social grounding and effects. By placing the Standards within the growing conservative movement in education, this paper raises a number of crucial issues about the documents, including the depth of the financial crisis in education and its economic and ideological genesis and results; the nature of inequality in schools; the role of mathematical knowledge in our economy in maintaining these inequalities; the possibilities and limitations of a mathematics curriculum that is more grounded in students' experiences; and the complicated realities of teachers' lives. Without a deeper understanding of these issues, the Standards will be used in ways that largely lend support only to the conservative agenda for educational reform.

Professional Development: Teachers' Communication and Collaboration Keys to Student Achievement

1995 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 454-458
Author(s):  
Helene J. Sherman ◽  
Thomas Jaeger
Keyword(s):  
Professional Development ◽  
Student Achievement ◽  
Educational Reform ◽  
Mathematics Teaching ◽  
School Mathematics ◽  
Professional Standards ◽  
Teaching Mathematics ◽  
Professional Satisfaction ◽  
Evaluation Standards ◽  
Instructional Changes

The curriculum and evaluation standards for School Mathematics (NCTM 1989) and the Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics (NCTM 1991) have served as both stimuli for, and responses to, numerous formal and informal programs, conferences, and conversations calling for educational reform and improvement in mathematics teaching. After all the plans are drawn and all the objectives are written, however, reform is most likely to occur and make a lasting difference when teachers are aware of the need for improvement, have a voice in planning it, and derive a real sense of professional satisfaction from implementing the instructional changes.

Standards-Based Teaching: Alive and Well in Portugal

2001 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
pp. 538-542
Author(s):  
Iris DeLoach Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Teaching ◽  
Teaching Practices ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Professional Standards ◽  
Teaching Mathematics ◽  
Mathematics Reform ◽  
Reform Movements ◽  
Mathematics Teaching And Learning ◽  
Principles And Standards

NCTM'S Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics (1991) emphasizes that teachers are “the key” to changing mathematics teaching and learning. Given that mathematics reform movements have never brought about “large-scale changes in teachers' behavior and teaching practices” (Hitch 1990, p. 2), Willis (1992) lamented that “whether the standards will actually produce sweeping changes in the way mathematics is taught and learned in U.S. classrooms remains to be seen” (p. 1). With Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (NCTM 2000), we continue to ask the vital question, How can we induce teachers to implement the Standards?

Reporting Research for Practitioners: Proposed Guidelines

2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 126-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Heck ◽  
James E. Tarr ◽  
Karen F. Hollebrands ◽  
Erica N. Walker ◽  
Robert Q. Berry III ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Education Research ◽  
Mathematics Teaching ◽  
Teaching Practice ◽  
Mathematics Curriculum ◽  
National Council ◽  
Research And Teaching ◽  
Curriculum Instruction ◽  
And Mathematics ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Increasing Student Learning

The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) espouses priorities to foster stronger linkages between mathematics education research and teaching practice. Of the five foundational priorities, one is directly focused on research, indicating NCTM's commitment to “ensure that sound research is integrated into all activities of the Council” (NCTM, n.d.). Another priority specifically references the relationship between research and mathematics teaching; the priority on curriculum, instruction, and assessment states that NCTM pledges to “Provide guidance and resources for developing and implementing mathematics curriculum, instruction, and assessment that are coherent, focused, well-articulated, and consistent with research in the field [emphasis added], and focused on increasing student learning” (NCTM, n.d.).

Implementing the “Curriculum and Evaluation Standards”: Recognizing and Recording Reform in Mathematics: New Questions, Many Answers

1994 ◽  
Vol 87 (3) ◽  
pp. 190-193
Author(s):  
Joan Ferrini-Mundy ◽  
Loren Johnson ◽  
James R. Smart
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Education ◽  
School Mathematics ◽  
Professional Standards ◽  
Teaching Mathematics ◽  
Anecdotal Evidence ◽  
Reform Effort ◽  
Evaluation Standards ◽  
Curriculum And Pedagogy ◽  
Standards Documents

NCTM's Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (1989) and its Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics (1991) lend possible direction and meaning to the reform effort in mathematics education that is sweeping the country. The documents have been widely disseminated and discussed, and anecdotal evidence indicates that teachers of mathematics are seeking ways to enact the ideas contained in the standards documents. These documents are also inspiring the development of standards in other disciplines. But a number of questions are being raised as schools, districts, states, and provinces attempt to incorporate these Standards in changing their curriculum and pedagogy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document