scholarly journals Challenges in bioethanol production from intermediate and by-products of the sugar beet processing in the Republic of Serbia

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 34-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jelena Dodić ◽  
Jovana Grahovac ◽  
Zorana Rončević ◽  
Radmila Pajović-Šćepanović ◽  
Siniša Dodić ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Bioethanol Production ◽  
The Republic ◽  
By Products

scholarly journals Integrated Processing of Secondary Raw Materials as the Main Direction of Ecologization of Beet Sugar Production In The Republic of Kazakhstan

2020 ◽  
Vol 159 ◽  
pp. 03002
Author(s):  
Gulzira Zhaxygulova ◽  
Maiya Myrzabekova ◽  
Guzel Sadykova
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
Raw Materials ◽  
Production Costs ◽  
Sugar Production ◽  
Processing Technologies ◽  
Secondary Resources ◽  
Beet Sugar ◽  
The Republic ◽  
By Products

Beet sugar production is one of the material-intensive industries, where the volume of raw and auxiliary materials used in production is several times higher than the output of finished products. It is also a source of multi-tonnage secondary resources, i.e. by-products and production waste, the main ones beingAbeet pulp, molasses and filtration sludge. Against the background of the implementation of the Sectoral Program of Beet Sugar Production Development in the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2018-2027, there is a need to create a concept of ecologization of production, which will provide for the development of fundamentally new technologies to ensure minimum waste, combining environmentally friendly methods with cost-effective production of sugar beet and by-products. The bet should be made on low-cost technologies that will minimize production costs and environmental impact. In this article possible variants of sugar beet processing technologies with complex deep processing of waste are offered. The comparison of traditional technology and various variants of progressive technologies of sugar beet processing and production of new products from secondary resources was carried out, which allowed to determine revenue from complex processing of 1 ton of sugar beet.

The determination of betaine in sugar beet by-products

The Analyst ◽  
1936 ◽  
Vol 61 (729) ◽  
pp. 829 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. W. Blood ◽  
H. T. Cranfield
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
By Products

Bioethanol production from sugar beet molasses and thick juice by free and immobilisedSaccharomyces cerevisiae

2018 ◽  
Vol 125 (1) ◽  
pp. 134-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vesna M. Vučurović ◽  
Vladimir S. Puškaš ◽  
Uroš D. Miljić
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Bioethanol Production ◽  
Beet Molasses ◽  
Sugar Beet Molasses ◽  
Thick Juice

An Improved CARV Process for Bioethanol Production from a Mixture of Sugar Beet Mash and Potato Mash

2011 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 602-604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min-Soo YUN ◽  
Jeung-yil PARK ◽  
Mitsuhiro ARAKANE ◽  
Riki SHIROMA ◽  
Masakazu IKE ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Bioethanol Production

scholarly journals Acid and Enzymatic Hydrolyses of Rice Bran for Bioethanol Production

ALCHEMY ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 24
Author(s):  
Dewi Yuliani ◽  
Khoirul Achmad Julianto ◽  
Akyunul Jannah
Keyword(s):  
Enzymatic Hydrolysis ◽  
Hydrochloric Acid ◽  
Acid Hydrolysis ◽  
Sulphuric Acid ◽  
Rice Bran ◽  
Dilute Hydrochloric Acid ◽  
Cellulolytic Enzyme ◽  
Bioethanol Production ◽  
By Products ◽  
Sugar Source

<p class="BodyAbstract">Rice bran is one among many agricultural by-products containing ~50-60 wt.% of carbohydrate. The carbohydrate is a prominent sugar source for bioethanol production. The objective of this research was to study bioethanol production from rice bran by acid and enzymatic treatment. The variations of acid used were dilute hydrochloric acid and sulphuric acid, while variations of enzyme used were amylolytic and cellulolytic enzyme. Ethanol production of acid-hydrolyzed rice bran was 24.95±1.61% (v/v) by hydrochloric acid and 29.57±2.04% (v/v) by sulphuric acid. Ethanol produced by enzymatic hydrolysis was quite low i.e. 6.7±0.04%, and 8.86±0.29% (v/v) for amylolytic and cellulolytic hydrolysate, respectively.</p><p class="BodyAbstract"> </p><p>Keywords: Bioethanol, rice bran, acid hydrolysis, enzymatic hydrolysis</p>

scholarly journals Биологизированная технология возделывания сахарной свеклы

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
V.S. Sergeev ◽  
◽  
D.R. Mukminov ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Plant Protection ◽  
Sugar Content ◽  
Crop Productivity ◽  
Production Costs ◽  
Stress Factors ◽  
Mineral Fertilizers ◽  
Biological Products ◽  
Traditional Technology ◽  
The Republic

Sugar beet is the main technical crop in the Republic of Bashkortostan. Beet growing in the region is carried out in the zone of risky agriculture. Based on the bioproducts produced for Beta vulgaris growing, the team of the BashInkom Scientific & Innovation Enterprise together with scientists from the Research Institute of Sugar Beet and Sugar and leading Russian beet growers improved and optimized the traditional technology, which, even under stressful conditions (drought, temperature decrease, waterlogging, freezing, toxic chemical oppression, lack of readily soluble nutrients) and a significant reduction in production costs, increases crop productivity by 20% and sugar content by 0.1-0.3%. Production experiments were carried out in beet-growing farms of the republic: farming company “Mukminov”, LLC “Voskhod” (Gafuri region), LLC farming company “Salavat”, LLC “Michurina” (Aurgazinsky district), LLC “Region-Agro” (Davlekanovsky district), etc. Research results confirm the effectiveness of the use of biological products and biofertilizers in sugar beet cultivation technology. The increase in the yield amounted to 2-10 t/ha compared to traditional technology; sugar content increased to 0.3%; finance costs that are attributable to the acquisition and use of biological products and bioactivated fertilizers have paid off, and high profitability is guaranteed. Conclusions: 1. Biological products and bioactivated fertilizers are an integral and mandatory element in the technology of sugar beet cultivation, as well as an innovative solution in protecting plants from environmental stress factors and in balancing plant nutrition by carrying out leaf feeding in key phases of growth and development. 2. Biologized technology allows increasing the yield of sugar beet by 20% and reducing the cost of chemical plant protection products and mineral fertilizers by 1.2-1.3 times. 3. Economic efficiency in the cultivation of sugar beet from the use of biological products and bioactivated fertilizers is up to 8 net profit per 1 RUB production costs.

scholarly journals The effect of changes in opportunity costs and prices of some agricultural products such as sugar beet, corn,wheat etc. used for bioethanol production on the cost of bioethanol production is not adequately known in Turkey.. Therefore, it was aimed to determine the bioethanol production cost items and unit production costs and also to put forth the effects of variations in raw material prices on cost of bioethanol.. The research data were collected via personal interviews from active bioethanol plants in Turkey. The results of previous studies and documents of related institutions and organizations were also used. The study followed classical cost analysis approach to calculate production cost. Scenario analysis was performed when exploring the effect of raw material prices on bioethanol production cost. Research findings showed that production cost per litre bioethanol produced from sugar beet molasses, corn, wheat and corn-wheat mixture were 2.50 TL, 2.84 TL, 2.95 and 2.84 TL, respectively. The share of raw material expenses in bioethanol cost per liter varied associated with the crops used in the process, it was 28.55% for bioethanol produced from sugar beet molasses, 44.81% for bioethanol produced from corn-wheat mixture and 44.87% bioethanol produced from corn. The research results also showed that the changes that occur in raw material prices significantly affected the bioethanol production cost and opportunity cost of crops created difficulties in biomass supply. Implementing the suitable policies and strategies and making the necessary arrangements in legislation would enhance the economic sustainability of bioethanol production in Turkey.

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-16
Author(s):  
Selime Canan ◽  
Vedat Ceyhan
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Production Cost ◽  
Agricultural Products ◽  
Production Costs ◽  
Raw Material ◽  
Bioethanol Production ◽  
Beet Molasses ◽  
Sugar Beet Molasses ◽  
Research Findings ◽  
The Cost

The Relationship between the Yield of Sugar and the Composition of Nonsugars of Sugar Beet in the Conditions of the Republic of Tatarstan

2021 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. 643-648
Author(s):  
M. I. Egorova ◽  
L. N. Puzanova ◽  
L. Yu. Smirnova ◽  
E. V. Leonteva
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Relationship

The Role of Irrigation in the Development of Agriculture

2016 ◽  
pp. 102-124
Author(s):  
Vesna Ž. Popović ◽  
Jonel V. Subić ◽  
Nataša Ž. Kljajić
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Agricultural Production ◽  
Irrigation System ◽  
Economic Benefits ◽  
Economic Effects ◽  
System Construction ◽  
Irrigation Policy ◽  
Pome Fruits ◽  
The Republic

The Srem district is home to producers of corn, oilseeds, sugar beet and tobacco, a leading region in the production of pome fruits (apples, pears) and drupes (plums, peaches, cherries) in the country and a perspective area for the development of organic plant and livestock production in protected areas. The current irrigation policy in the Republic of Serbia was not directed at systematic water use with the goal of forming an optimal structure of a market propulsive and a highly profitable agricultural production. The authors in the paper analyse the structure of agricultural production in the Srem district in Serbia and its market potentials as well as the economic effects of irrigation in light of the planned integral irrigation system construction in the Srem district in order to reflect economic benefits of irrigation and its role in the development of agriculture.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document