An Improved CARV Process for Bioethanol Production from a Mixture of Sugar Beet Mash and Potato Mash

2011 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 602-604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min-Soo YUN ◽  
Jeung-yil PARK ◽  
Mitsuhiro ARAKANE ◽  
Riki SHIROMA ◽  
Masakazu IKE ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Bioethanol Production

Bioethanol production from sugar beet molasses and thick juice by free and immobilisedSaccharomyces cerevisiae

2018 ◽  
Vol 125 (1) ◽  
pp. 134-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vesna M. Vučurović ◽  
Vladimir S. Puškaš ◽  
Uroš D. Miljić
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Bioethanol Production ◽  
Beet Molasses ◽  
Sugar Beet Molasses ◽  
Thick Juice

scholarly journals The effect of changes in opportunity costs and prices of some agricultural products such as sugar beet, corn,wheat etc. used for bioethanol production on the cost of bioethanol production is not adequately known in Turkey.. Therefore, it was aimed to determine the bioethanol production cost items and unit production costs and also to put forth the effects of variations in raw material prices on cost of bioethanol.. The research data were collected via personal interviews from active bioethanol plants in Turkey. The results of previous studies and documents of related institutions and organizations were also used. The study followed classical cost analysis approach to calculate production cost. Scenario analysis was performed when exploring the effect of raw material prices on bioethanol production cost. Research findings showed that production cost per litre bioethanol produced from sugar beet molasses, corn, wheat and corn-wheat mixture were 2.50 TL, 2.84 TL, 2.95 and 2.84 TL, respectively. The share of raw material expenses in bioethanol cost per liter varied associated with the crops used in the process, it was 28.55% for bioethanol produced from sugar beet molasses, 44.81% for bioethanol produced from corn-wheat mixture and 44.87% bioethanol produced from corn. The research results also showed that the changes that occur in raw material prices significantly affected the bioethanol production cost and opportunity cost of crops created difficulties in biomass supply. Implementing the suitable policies and strategies and making the necessary arrangements in legislation would enhance the economic sustainability of bioethanol production in Turkey.

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-16
Author(s):  
Selime Canan ◽  
Vedat Ceyhan
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Production Cost ◽  
Agricultural Products ◽  
Production Costs ◽  
Raw Material ◽  
Bioethanol Production ◽  
Beet Molasses ◽  
Sugar Beet Molasses ◽  
Research Findings ◽  
The Cost

Life cycle analysis for bioethanol production from sugar beet crops in Greece

Energy Policy ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 39 (9) ◽  
pp. 4834-4841 ◽  
Author(s):  
Spyros Foteinis ◽  
Victor Kouloumpis ◽  
Theocharis Tsoutsos
Keyword(s):  
Life Cycle ◽  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Life Cycle Analysis ◽  
Bioethanol Production

scholarly journals Potential agronomic options for energy-efficient sugar beet-based bioethanol production in northern Japan

GCB Bioenergy ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 220-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
NOBUHISA KOGA ◽  
HIROYUKI TAKAHASHI ◽  
KAZUYUKI OKAZAKI ◽  
TSUTOMU KAJIYAMA ◽  
SOHEI KOBAYASHI
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Energy Efficient ◽  
Bioethanol Production ◽  
Northern Japan

scholarly journals Challenges in bioethanol production from intermediate and by-products of the sugar beet processing in the Republic of Serbia

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 34-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jelena Dodić ◽  
Jovana Grahovac ◽  
Zorana Rončević ◽  
Radmila Pajović-Šćepanović ◽  
Siniša Dodić ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Bioethanol Production ◽  
The Republic ◽  
By Products

scholarly journals Secondary pollution of water during the biosorption of heavy metal ions by pristine and sugar beet shreds from bioethanol production

2018 ◽  
pp. 81-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dragana Kukic ◽  
Marina Sciban ◽  
Vesna Vasic ◽  
Jelena Prodanovic
Keyword(s):  
Heavy Metal ◽  
Sugar Beet ◽  
Metal Ions ◽  
Adsorption Capacity ◽  
Heavy Metal Ions ◽  
Bioethanol Production ◽  
Limit Values ◽  
Secondary Pollution ◽  
Emission Limit ◽  
High Concentrations

When biomaterials are used as adsorbents, some compounds present in their structure can be extracted and cause secondary pollution of the treated water. Depending on the type and amount of the secondary pollution, some materials can be unacceptable as adsorbents despite of their good adsorption capacity. Although, it is not a newly discovered phenomenon and it is recognized as a problem, leaching from adsorbents is neglected. The aim of our study is to investigate the secondary pollution of the water during the biosorption of heavy metal ions by pristine and modified sugar beet shreds from bioethanol production. The presence of different elements in the mentioned adsorbents, secondary pollution of the water during the adsorption of heavy metal ions and amount of reducing sugars in the water treated by pristine sugar beet shreds were characterized by the SEM-EDS method, the amount of the leached inorganic and organic matter from the adsorbents (atomic absorption spectroscopy and permanganate index) and Bertrand's method, respectively. Furthermore, the obtained results were compared to the available literature data. Our results showed that according to the valid regulations of emission limit values of the polluting substances in the water and adsorption capacity, the investigated adsorbents have a great potential as biosorbents for practical treatment of wastewaters which contain high concentrations of heavy metal ions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document