scholarly journals Brushing Cytology with Fibergastroscope under direct Vision

1973 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-30
Author(s):  
Shoichi IKEGUCHI ◽  
Kunihiko MUTO ◽  
Katsumasa YOKOTA ◽  
Yoshikazu MATSUZAWA ◽  
Masayuki ARAKAWA ◽  
...  
1955 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 649-657
Author(s):  
Herbert E. Warden ◽  
Raymond C. Read ◽  
Richard A. DeWall ◽  
Joseph B. Aust ◽  
Morley Cohen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. e36-e37
Author(s):  
Manas Dube ◽  
Jeffrey Wu ◽  
Rishabha Sharma ◽  
Yvonne Chang ◽  
Kishore Makam

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 030006052098777
Author(s):  
Song-Ming Ding ◽  
Ai-Li Lu ◽  
Bing-Qian Xu ◽  
Shao-Hua Shi ◽  
Muhammad Ibrahim Alhadi Edoo ◽  
...  

Objective False positive and negative results are associated with biliary tract cell brushing cytology during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The causes are uncertain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of diagnoses made via cell brushing in our center, and to explore the factors influencing diagnosis. Methods The clinical data of patients who underwent cell brushing at our center from January 2016 to August 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. These included age, gender, stricture location, thickness of the bile duct wall in the narrow segment, maximum diameter of the biliary duct above the stricture, number of cell brush smears, carbohydrate antigen 19-9, and carcinoembryonic antigen. Positive brush cytology results were compared with results of surgical histology or tumor biopsy as well as with the patient’s clinical course. Results Of the 48 patients who underwent cell brushing cytology, 27 (56.3%) had positive results. The sensitivity and specificity of biliary duct cell brushing was 79.4%, and 85.7%, respectively. None of the above-mentioned factors were associated with positive cytology brushing results. Conclusions Cell brushing cytology remains a reliable method for diagnosis of pancreaticobiliary malignancies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document